Skip to content

The ISEO Biofeedback Tool During the Rehabilitation of Patients Treated for Rotator Cuff Tear

The Use of the Motion Analysis System ISEO, as a Biofeedback Tool During the Rehabilitation Process of Patients Surgically Treated for Rotator Cuff Tear

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04521504
Acronym
PDT1-1
Enrollment
46
Registered
2020-08-20
Start date
2017-11-21
Completion date
2020-02-27
Last updated
2020-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Tears

Keywords

Shoulder, Biofeedback, Kinematics

Brief summary

The present study addresses the issue about post-surgical recovery process, for patients arthroscopically treated for rotator-cuff tear. The aim of the research is to test the effectiveness of a new rehabilitation protocol that includes kinematic biofeedback with the motion analysis system ISEO.

Detailed description

The research includes at least 62 patients arthroscopically treated for the rotator cuff tear. For this purpose, two groups of patients of equal size are identified. The attribution of each patient to one of the two groups is random. The standard rehabilitation protocol is applied to the Control group (Group A), whereas the standard rehabilitation protocol integrated by proprioception exercises (physical therapist assisted) performed with ISEO is applied to the Experimental group (Group B). The primary objective is to verify if the ISEO system, used as a biofeedback tool, improves shoulder functionality and activity of patients arthroscopically treated for rotator cuff tear, both in the short (90 days from surgery) and in the medium term (6-12 months from surgery). All patients are longitudinally evaluated from the pre-surgery to a 6/12 months follow-up. Each evaluation includes both a clinical and an instrumented assessment of shoulder kinematics. The primary outcome tested is the Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score, which represents a reformulation of the Constant-Murley Score, which is modified based on the quality of the scapular movement measured with ISEO.

Interventions

DEVICEKinematic biofeedback with ISEO motion analysis system

Exercises are performed with the help of the ISEO motion analysis system, that provides a real-time biofeedback of shoulder kinematics. All exercises are administered by the Physical Therapist.

Sponsors

AUSL Romagna Rimini
CollaboratorOTHER
Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study considers participants divided in two groups: the control group and the experimental group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with rotator cuff injuries; * asymptomatic contralateral shoulder, that can be considered as a reference for the differential evaluation; * indication for arthroscopy; * employees; * rehabilitation executed at AUSL-Romagna.

Exclusion criteria

* irreparable injuries of the rotator cuff; * contralateral painful shoulder; * patients being treated for cancer in the last 6 months; * patients with concomitant neurological pathologies; * patients with spinal cord injuries; * patients with cuff lesions with infectious processes; * patients with severe scoliosis; * patients with recurrent lesions of the cuff; * patients with occupational diseases or work-related accidents; * patients for whom the return to work cannot be reliably established.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score (SW-CMS) at T5A6 months after surgeryThe SW-CMS is a modified version of the CMS, based on the quality of the movement of the scapula: the score referred to humerus elevation is weighted based on scapula movement. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.
The Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score (SW-CMS) at T5B12 months after surgeryThe SW-CMS is a modified version of the CMS, based on the quality of the movement of the scapula: the score referred to humerus elevation is weighted based on scapula movement. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.
The Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score (SW-CMS) at T390 days after surgeryThe SW-CMS is a modified version of the CMS, based on the quality of the movement of the scapula: the score referred to humerus elevation is weighted based on scapula movement. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).The DASH is a very popular questionnaire that quantifies the level of disability of a patient with upper limb disease. The questionnaire is a self-administered by the patient. The DASH varies between 0 (best) and 100 (worse) points.
EuroQol five-dimension scale (EQ-5D)T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).The EQ-5D is a standard questionnaire for the measure of health outcome. EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). The EQ-5D varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.
Pectoralis Minor lengthT0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).Pectoralis Minor length in mm
Body Mass Index (BMI)Before surgeryThe BMI is measure in kg/m\^2
Cervical pain: Presence of cervical pain YES or NOT. If YES, whyBefore surgeryIt is measured by the Doctor as follows: Presence of cervical pain YES or NOT. If YES, why.
Superficial Electromyography (sEMG)T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).The sEMG is the electrical activity of shoulder superficial muscles. Muscles acquired are: Deltoid (anterior and posterior), Trapezius (upper, medium and lower), Serratus Anterior, Pectoralis Major and Latissimus Dorsi.
Constant-Murley Score (CMS)T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).The CMS is a standard questionnaire for the evaluation of patients with shoulder diseases, one of the most widespread in Europe. The Score varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.
American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)T0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).The ASES is a very popular questionnaire (in particular in the USA), partly completed from the patient and partly completed from the doctor. The part dedicated to the patient provides for an assessment of pain, instability and daily life activities. The part filled in by the doctor includes 4 items on tenderness. The ASES varies between 0 (worse) and 100 (best) points.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of job-changeT4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).Percentage of patients that had to change their job
Degree of satisfaction of the patient: scoreT0 (before surgery), T1 (45 days after surgery), T3 (90 days after surgery), T4 (return-to-work time, up to 24 weeks), T5A (6 months after surgery) and T5B (12 months after surgery).Evaluation of the satisfaction of the patient during the rehabilitation period. The score varies from 0 (totally unsatisfied) and 10 (totally satisfied).

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026