Skip to content

Kharituwe TB Contact Tracing Study

Innovative Contact Tracing Strategies for Detecting TB in Mobile Rural and Urban South African Populations

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04520113
Enrollment
10579
Registered
2020-08-20
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2025-03-31
Last updated
2025-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hiv, Tuberculosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to characterize the role of human mobility in fueling TB epidemics and estimate the potential impact of innovative case finding interventions tailored to mobile populations

Detailed description

The investigators propose a randomized trial of two novel TB case-finding interventions among household members of patients diagnosed with active TB: holiday-based screening in a rural South African province (Limpopo) and off-peak (weekend/evening) screening in an urban settlement into which many residents of Limpopo migrate for work. The investigators will enroll index cases of TB plus their household contacts in each setting and randomize them to novel versus standard contact investigation. In Specific Aim 1, investigators will use whole genome sequencing of all cases, overlaying transmission trees with data on human movement, to evaluate associations between mobility and TB transmission in this population. In Specific Aim 2, investigators will employ a multidisciplinary approach to compare novel versus standard contact investigation in each setting along the following dimensions: (a) effectiveness (number of secondary TB cases diagnosed and starting treatment); (b) implementation (reach, fidelity, and maintenance of contact investigation outside of business hours); (c) cost-effectiveness (cost per disability-adjusted life year) and budget impact; and (d) projected population-level impact on TB incidence. Successful completion of these aims will have long-term impact by characterizing the role of mobility in fueling TB epidemics and testing two tailored approaches to improve TB control in highly mobile populations - an underserved group that is increasingly recognized as playing a major role in global TB transmission.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHousehold contact tracing

Household contact tracing to test and diagnose Tuberculosis of household contacts of Tuberculosis patients.

Sponsors

Perinatal HIV Research Unit of the University of the Witswatersrand
CollaboratorOTHER
Setshaba Research Centre
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The National Institute for Communicable Diseases
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

The principal investigators are blinded as to the assignment of treatment to participants

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

TB index cases: Inclusion criteria: * Age 0-99 years (Including those recently deceased) * Diagnosed with pulmonary TB at a study hospital or clinic (microbiological and/or chest x-ray diagnosis)

Exclusion criteria

* Unwilling/unable to provide informed consent (including next of kin, for those recently deceased) * Plan not to pursue TB treatment within the study district * Unwilling/unable to comply with study procedures Contacts: Inclusion criteria: * Age 0-99 years * Currently resides with or visiting eligible TB index case

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness: Mean Number of Secondary TB Cases Identified and Started on Treatment Per Index Case in Each ArmUp to 35 monthsThe mean number of secondary TB cases identified and started on treatment per index case for each arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TB Strain Relatedness Using Maximum Likelihood Transmission Trees.Duration of study (30 months)TB natural history, epidemiological, and whole genome sequencing (WGS)-derived phylogenetic data will be integrated into a statistical modeling framework to draw probabilistic conclusions about the likelihood of transmission between persons. Transmitters will be defined as individuals from whom at least one secondary case most likely originated.
Relative Acceptability of Each Novel Strategy Compared to Standard Contact InvestigationDuration of study (30 months)Relative acceptability of each novel strategy, compared against routine contact investigation. Acceptability of the intervention will be measured among index cases and contacts using a short questionnaire given to a randomly selected participant at a randomly selected 15% of the households visited. The interview will cover acceptability of the visit timing, notification, visit activities (TB screening, HIV testing) and study team interaction among others.
Feasibility of Each Strategy: Proportion of Potentially Eligible Index Cases for Whom a Household Visit Was ConductedDuration of study (30 months(Feasibility of each strategy as the proportion of potentially eligible index cases for whom a household visit was conducted. All reasons why visits were unable to be conducted will be recorded (e.g. could not find household, no one ever home, visit not conducted during expected off-peak period).
The TB Prevalence Ratio, Comparing Highly Mobile to Less Mobile Index PatientsDuration of study (30 months)The TB prevalence ratio, comparing highly mobile to less mobile individuals, measuring mobility on two scales (neighborhood/intra-urban and regional/intra-national). For the analysis: amount of time spent in transit, truncating long excursions at 50km (one hour).
Sustainability of Each Novel Strategy Relative to Standard Contact TracingDuration of study (30 months)Sustainability of each novel strategy by reporting the primary outcome and fidelity measures according to six-month time period over the course of the study.
Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio for Each Novel Strategy Relative to Standard Contact TracingDuration of study (30 months)Defined as (cost of contact tracing strategy 2 - cost of strategy 1)/(effectiveness of strategy 2 - effectiveness of strategy 1), where effectiveness is modeled as the number of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted by the intervention. The primary cost-effectiveness measures will be the incremental cost per DALY averted using novel strategies (holiday and off-hours contact tracing) compared to routine contact tracing in each setting separately.
Relative Fidelity of Each Novel Strategy Compared to Standard Contact InvestigationDuration of study (30 months)Relative fidelity of each novel strategy using a process checklist for each index case and household, including whether the household visit was offered and accepted, whether the visit was attempted, whether the visit was successful (i.e., enrolled at least one contact), whether symptom screening and sputum collection were completed and whether newly identified TB cases were notified and referred for treatment.

Countries

South Africa

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Consecutive eligible index participants with TB were recruited from among 12 public hospitals in Limpopo and 33 primary health care clinics and 2 public hospitals in Soshanguve.

Pre-assignment details

The actual enrollment in the study contains the 4417 index TB cases, and within the index participants' households, 6162 contact persons, for a total of 10579 enrolled individuals. Only the 4417 index TB cases were randomized to arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Tracing- Limpopo
This arm was located in the Limpopo site. Households of tuberculosis index patients receive standard household contact tracing during regular weekday business hours. Household contact tracing: Household contact tracing to test and diagnose Tuberculosis of household contacts of Tuberculosis patients.
4,368
Holiday Tracing
Households of tuberculosis index patients in rural South Africa receive household contact tracing during holidays (Christmas and Easter). Household contact tracing: Household contact tracing to test and diagnose Tuberculosis of household contacts of Tuberculosis patients.
1,952
Evening / Weekend Tracing
Households of tuberculosis index patients in urban South Africa receive household contact tracing during evenings and weekends. Household contact tracing: Household contact tracing to test and diagnose Tuberculosis of household contacts of Tuberculosis patients.
1,320
Standard Tracing- Soshanguve
This arm was located in the Soshanguve site. Households of tuberculosis index patients receive standard household contact tracing during regular weekday business hours. Household contact tracing: Household contact tracing to test and diagnose Tuberculosis of household contacts of Tuberculosis patients.
2,939
Total10,579

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard Tracing- LimpopoTotalStandard Tracing- SoshanguveEvening / Weekend TracingHoliday Tracing
Age, Continuous
Contact person participants
18 years27 years34 years33 years18 years
Age, Continuous
Index TB participants
41 years41 years41 years42 years42 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
Contact person participants
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Contact person participants
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Contact person participants
Black or African American
3020 Participants6144 Participants1325 Participants514 Participants1285 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Contact person participants
More than one race
13 Participants18 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Contact person participants
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Contact person participants
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Contact person participants
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Index TB Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Index TB Participants
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Index TB Participants
Black or African American
1325 Participants4393 Participants1601 Participants801 Participants666 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Index TB Participants
More than one race
10 Participants24 Participants11 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Index TB Participants
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Index TB Participants
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Index TB Participants
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
Contact person participants
3033 Participants6162 Participants1327 Participants516 Participants1286 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
Index TB Participants
1335 Participants4417 Participants1612 Participants804 Participants666 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Contact person participants
Female
1884 Participants3864 Participants849 Participants346 Participants785 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Contact person participants
Male
1149 Participants2298 Participants478 Participants170 Participants501 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Index TB participants
Female
584 Participants1766 Participants566 Participants330 Participants286 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Index TB participants
Male
751 Participants2651 Participants1046 Participants474 Participants380 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Effectiveness: Mean Number of Secondary TB Cases Identified and Started on Treatment Per Index Case in Each Arm

The mean number of secondary TB cases identified and started on treatment per index case for each arm.

Time frame: Up to 35 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Standard Tracing- LimpopoEffectiveness: Mean Number of Secondary TB Cases Identified and Started on Treatment Per Index Case in Each Arm1.7 mean secondary TB cases
Holiday TracingEffectiveness: Mean Number of Secondary TB Cases Identified and Started on Treatment Per Index Case in Each Arm1.2 mean secondary TB cases
Evening / Weekend TracingEffectiveness: Mean Number of Secondary TB Cases Identified and Started on Treatment Per Index Case in Each Arm2.3 mean secondary TB cases
Standard Tracing- SoshanguveEffectiveness: Mean Number of Secondary TB Cases Identified and Started on Treatment Per Index Case in Each Arm2.4 mean secondary TB cases
Secondary

Feasibility of Each Strategy: Proportion of Potentially Eligible Index Cases for Whom a Household Visit Was Conducted

Feasibility of each strategy as the proportion of potentially eligible index cases for whom a household visit was conducted. All reasons why visits were unable to be conducted will be recorded (e.g. could not find household, no one ever home, visit not conducted during expected off-peak period).

Time frame: Duration of study (30 months(

Secondary

Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio for Each Novel Strategy Relative to Standard Contact Tracing

Defined as (cost of contact tracing strategy 2 - cost of strategy 1)/(effectiveness of strategy 2 - effectiveness of strategy 1), where effectiveness is modeled as the number of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted by the intervention. The primary cost-effectiveness measures will be the incremental cost per DALY averted using novel strategies (holiday and off-hours contact tracing) compared to routine contact tracing in each setting separately.

Time frame: Duration of study (30 months)

Secondary

Relative Acceptability of Each Novel Strategy Compared to Standard Contact Investigation

Relative acceptability of each novel strategy, compared against routine contact investigation. Acceptability of the intervention will be measured among index cases and contacts using a short questionnaire given to a randomly selected participant at a randomly selected 15% of the households visited. The interview will cover acceptability of the visit timing, notification, visit activities (TB screening, HIV testing) and study team interaction among others.

Time frame: Duration of study (30 months)

Secondary

Relative Fidelity of Each Novel Strategy Compared to Standard Contact Investigation

Relative fidelity of each novel strategy using a process checklist for each index case and household, including whether the household visit was offered and accepted, whether the visit was attempted, whether the visit was successful (i.e., enrolled at least one contact), whether symptom screening and sputum collection were completed and whether newly identified TB cases were notified and referred for treatment.

Time frame: Duration of study (30 months)

Secondary

Sustainability of Each Novel Strategy Relative to Standard Contact Tracing

Sustainability of each novel strategy by reporting the primary outcome and fidelity measures according to six-month time period over the course of the study.

Time frame: Duration of study (30 months)

Secondary

TB Strain Relatedness Using Maximum Likelihood Transmission Trees.

TB natural history, epidemiological, and whole genome sequencing (WGS)-derived phylogenetic data will be integrated into a statistical modeling framework to draw probabilistic conclusions about the likelihood of transmission between persons. Transmitters will be defined as individuals from whom at least one secondary case most likely originated.

Time frame: Duration of study (30 months)

Secondary

The TB Prevalence Ratio, Comparing Highly Mobile to Less Mobile Index Patients

The TB prevalence ratio, comparing highly mobile to less mobile individuals, measuring mobility on two scales (neighborhood/intra-urban and regional/intra-national). For the analysis: amount of time spent in transit, truncating long excursions at 50km (one hour).

Time frame: Duration of study (30 months)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 12, 2026