Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Lacosamide in Neonates With Repeated Electroencephalographic Neonatal Seizures

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Active Comparator Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Lacosamide in Neonates With Repeated Electroencephalographic Neonatal Seizures

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04519645
Acronym
LENS
Enrollment
29
Registered
2020-08-20
Start date
2021-03-31
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2025-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Electroencephalographic Neonatal Seizures, Epilepsy

Keywords

electroencephalographic neonatal seizures, epilepsy, neonatal study participants, Vimpat, lacosamide, LCM, pediatric, video-EEG

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) versus an Active Comparator chosen based on standard of care (StOC) in severe and nonsevere seizure burden (defined as total minutes of electroencephalographic neonatal seizures (ENS) per hour) in neonates with seizures that are not adequately controlled with previous anti-epileptic drug (AED) treatment.

Interventions

DRUGLacosamide intravenous

Study participants will receive lacosamide (LCM) as an intravenous (iv) infusion during the Treatment Period.

Study participants may receive lacosamide (LCM) as an oral solution during the Extension Period.

OTHERActive Comparator

Active Comparator treatment will be chosen and dosed based on StOC (per local practice and treatment guidelines).

Sponsors

UCB Biopharma SRL
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 28 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant must be ≥34 weeks of corrected gestational age (CGA), \<46 weeks of CGA, and \<28 days of postnatal age (PNA) * Participants who have confirmation on video-electroencephalogram (EEG) of ≥2 minutes of cumulative electroencephalographic neonatal seizures (ENS) or ≥3 identifiable ENS prior to entering the Treatment Period * Participants must have received either phenobarbital (PB), levetiracetam (LEV), or midazolam (MDZ) (in any combination) before entering the study * Participant weighs at least 2.3 kg at the time of enrollment Informed consent * An Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved written informed consent form (ICF) is signed and dated by the participant's parent(s) or legal representative(s)

Exclusion criteria

* Participant with seizures responding to correction of metabolic disturbances (hypoglycemia, hypomagnesemia, or hypocalcemia) or with seizures for which a targeted, known treatment is available * Participant has seizures related to prenatal maternal drug use or drug withdrawal * Participant has a clinically relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, in the opinion of the investigator * Participant receiving treatment with phenytoin (PHT), lidocaine (LDC), or other sodium channel blockers at any time

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Seizure Burden Measured in the Evaluation Video-electroencephalogram (Video-EEG) Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGDuring 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to BaselineBaseline seizure burden was defined as seizure burden measured on the continuous video-EEG (total electroencephalographic neonatal seizures (ENS) in minutes per hour) during a period of up to 2 hours immediately prior to the first administration of study drug. An ENS was defined as an EEG seizure lasting for at least 10 seconds on video-EEG. The seizure burden in the Evaluation Period was calculated as the total duration of seizures between 1 and 3 hours after the first dose of study medication divided by the duration of interpretable video-EEG available in the same period. Change in seizure burden measured in the Evaluation video-EEG compared with the Baseline video-EEG was analyzed such that a positive value indicates a reduction in seizure burden from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation a Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGDuring 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to BaselineA responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: A reduction in seizure burden from Baseline of \>=80% regardless of baseline seizure severity. Percentage of Participants With at least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation (starting 1 hour after treatment) of a Video-EEG Compared with the Baseline Video-EEG were reported.
Time to Response Across the 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGAcross the first 48 hours of Treatment Period, compared to BaselineTime to response where response was defined as a reduction in seizure burden from Baseline of at least 80% in participants with non-severe seizure burden, and of at least 50% for participants with severe seizure burden. Time to response was censored at the date/time the participant received rescue medication or stopped video-EEG monitoring, or otherwise at the end of the 48-hour period.
Time to Seizure Freedom Across the First 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGAcross the first 48 hours of Treatment Period, compared to BaselineSeizure freedom was defined as 0 minutes of seizures in a 1-hour period (or 2-hour period for the 3-hour time point) and was analyzed across the 48 hours. The time to seizure freedom was measured in hours, defined as the first time point when the response criterion was met minus the date and time of the first dose of randomized study medication administration. Time to seizure freedom was censored at the time of receiving rescue medication, stopping video-EEG monitoring or otherwise at 48 hours after first dose.
Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment Period: 7-8 hours, 15-16 hours, 23-24 hours, 31-32 hours, 39-40 hours, 47-48 hours, compared to BaselineBaseline seizure burden was calculated as total duration of seizures (in minutes) between -2 hour and 0 hours before first dose of study medication divided by total duration of interpretable video-EEG (in hours) in the same period. Seizure burden for 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour time points was calculated as total duration of seizures in the hour prior to time point divided by duration of interpretable video-EEG available in same period. If \<30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG were available in the 1 hour prior to the time point, response was calculated based on seizure burden for most recent 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG in the 2 hours (for 8 and 16 hour points) or 4 hours (for 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour points) prior to time point. The 30 minutes of video-EEG did not need to be continuous. Absolute reduction in seizure burden for these time points was calculated as seizure burden in Baseline Period minus seizure burden at that time point.
Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment Period: 7-8 hours, 15-16 hours, 23-24 hours, 31-32 hours, 39-40 hours, 47-48 hours, compared to BaselineThe percent change in seizure burden for the 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour time points was calculated as the seizure burden at Baseline minus the seizure burden at the respective time point, divided by the seizure burden in the Baseline Period, multiplied by 100. Percent change in seizure burden was analyzed such that a positive value indicates a reduction in seizure burden from baseline.
Percentage of Responders in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGDuring 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to BaselineA responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to the study medication administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: - At least 80% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized by the Investigator as having non-severe seizure burden during Baseline OR - At least 50% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized by the Investigator as having severe seizure burden during Baseline.
Percentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at Baseline24 hours after the start of Treatment Period, compared to BaselineSeizure free was defined as 100% reduction in seizure burden or having no seizures in the assessment period (23 to 24 hours after first dose) from Baseline. For the study participants with severe seizure burden at Baseline (as determined by the Investigator), the numerator was defined as the number of participants with severe seizure burden at Baseline who had no seizures between 23 and 24 hours after the start of the Treatment Period. The denominator for the percentages was based on the number of participants with video-EEG data available at the 24 hour time point. Here, N='overall number of participants analyzed' and n='number analyzed' in categories.
Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGDuring 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to BaselineBaseline seizure burden was calculated as total duration of seizures (in minutes) between -2 and 0 hours before the first dose of study medication divided by total duration of interpretable video-EEG (in hours) in same period. Seizure burden in Evaluation Period was calculated as total duration of seizures between 1 and 3 hours after first dose of study medication divided by duration of interpretable video-EEG available in same period. Percent change in seizure burden for Evaluation period was calculated as seizure burden at Baseline minus seizure burden at respective time point, divided by seizure burden in Baseline Period, multiplied by 100. Participants classified in one of following categories based on their percent reduction from Baseline to Evaluation Period: \< -25% (worsening), -25% to \<25% (no change), 25% to \<50%, 50% to \<80%, and \>=80%. Percent change in seizure burden was analyzed and categorized such that positive value indicates reduction in seizure burden from baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Reported by the InvestigatorFrom first administration of study treatment to the End of Safety Follow-up Period (up to Day 42)An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. TEAEs are defined as AEs which have onset on or after the start date and time of initial study medication administration.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)Active Comparator: Screening; Lacosamide: Screening, 1-6 hours, 48 and 96 hoursThe ECG treatment-emergent marked abnormalities values are based on grade 2 toxicity based on abnormal values or clinical experience based on investigator's discretion. Participants randomized to Lacosamide and enrolled under this version of the protocol have planned assessments at Screening, 1-6 hours, 48, and 96 hours only. For participants randomized to Active Comparator treatment, only the Screening assessment was applicable.
Serum Concentration of LacosamideDay 1: 30-90 minutes and 6 - 8 hours after start of first infusion, 30 - 90 minutes and 6 - 8 hours after start of second or third infusion, Days 2, 3 and 4Serum concentrations of lacosamide were measured and concentration data were summarized. PK sparse sampling was performed.
Percentage of Responders at the End of the First 48-hours of the Treatment PeriodAcross the first 48 hours of Treatment PeriodA responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: At least 80% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized as having nonsevere seizure burden during Baseline OR At least 50% reduction of seizure burden in participants who had at least one 30-minute period of severe seizure burden during Baseline. The denominator for the percentages was based on the number of participants with video- EEG data available at the 48 hour time point.

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study started to enrol participants in March 2021 and concluded in October 2024.

Pre-assignment details

The Participant Flow refers to the Safety set. This study was ended after agreed Pediatric investigation plan (PIP) modification, not linked to safety reasons.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Comparator
Study participants randomized to receive Active Comparator (chosen and dosed based on standard of care (StOC) per local practice and treatment guidelines) in the Treatment Period. After the Treatment Period, study participants had the option to continue to receive randomized Active Comparator in the Extension Period (up to 28 days of postnatal age). Study participants (whether they discontinued randomized treatment during the Treatment Period, completed the Extension Period, were discharged from the hospital, or reached 28 days of postnatal age) then entered the 14-day Safety Follow-up (SFU) Period with optional down titration.
12
Lacosamide
Study participants randomized to receive lacosamide 10 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL) 3 times a day as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes for up to 96 hours in the Treatment Period. After the Treatment Period, study participants had the option to continue to receive randomized lacosamide in the Extension Period (up to 28 days of postnatal age), being switched to oral dosing of lacosamide as soon as medically possible. Study participants (whether they discontinued randomized treatment during the Treatment Period, completed the Extension Period, were discharged from the hospital, or reached 28 days of postnatal age) then entered the 14-day SFU Period with optional down titration.
14
Total26

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Enrollment Period (Up to 36 Hours)Adverse Event100
Enrollment Period (Up to 36 Hours)Protocol Violation100
Enrollment Period (Up to 36 Hours)Withdrawal by Parent/Guardian100
Treatment Period (Up to 96 Hours)Consent withdrawn by parent/guardian,not due to AE010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive ComparatorLacosamideTotal
Age, Continuous3.1 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
4.1 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
3.7 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Age, Customized
0-<=27 days
12 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other or Mixed
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
8 Participants11 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 121 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 35 / 128 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 122 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Seizure Burden Measured in the Evaluation Video-electroencephalogram (Video-EEG) Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG

Baseline seizure burden was defined as seizure burden measured on the continuous video-EEG (total electroencephalographic neonatal seizures (ENS) in minutes per hour) during a period of up to 2 hours immediately prior to the first administration of study drug. An ENS was defined as an EEG seizure lasting for at least 10 seconds on video-EEG. The seizure burden in the Evaluation Period was calculated as the total duration of seizures between 1 and 3 hours after the first dose of study medication divided by the duration of interpretable video-EEG available in the same period. Change in seizure burden measured in the Evaluation video-EEG compared with the Baseline video-EEG was analyzed such that a positive value indicates a reduction in seizure burden from baseline.

Time frame: During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active ComparatorChange in Seizure Burden Measured in the Evaluation Video-electroencephalogram (Video-EEG) Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG2.45 minute per hour (min/hour)Standard Deviation 14.83
LacosamideChange in Seizure Burden Measured in the Evaluation Video-electroencephalogram (Video-EEG) Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG6.64 minute per hour (min/hour)Standard Deviation 6.55
Secondary

Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG

Baseline seizure burden was calculated as total duration of seizures (in minutes) between -2 hour and 0 hours before first dose of study medication divided by total duration of interpretable video-EEG (in hours) in the same period. Seizure burden for 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour time points was calculated as total duration of seizures in the hour prior to time point divided by duration of interpretable video-EEG available in same period. If \<30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG were available in the 1 hour prior to the time point, response was calculated based on seizure burden for most recent 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG in the 2 hours (for 8 and 16 hour points) or 4 hours (for 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour points) prior to time point. The 30 minutes of video-EEG did not need to be continuous. Absolute reduction in seizure burden for these time points was calculated as seizure burden in Baseline Period minus seizure burden at that time point.

Time frame: Treatment Period: 7-8 hours, 15-16 hours, 23-24 hours, 31-32 hours, 39-40 hours, 47-48 hours, compared to Baseline

Population: FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active ComparatorAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 7 hour - 8 hour-2.74 mins/hourStandard Deviation 15.53
Active ComparatorAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 15 hour - 16 hour3.63 mins/hourStandard Deviation 5.28
Active ComparatorAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 23 hour - 24 hour5.08 mins/hourStandard Deviation 4.81
Active ComparatorAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 31 hour - 32 hour5.71 mins/hourStandard Deviation 5.09
Active ComparatorAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 39 hour - 40 hour4.43 mins/hourStandard Deviation 5.8
Active ComparatorAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 47 hour - 48 hour4.84 mins/hourStandard Deviation 5.44
LacosamideAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 39 hour - 40 hour8.93 mins/hourStandard Deviation 8.56
LacosamideAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 7 hour - 8 hour6.30 mins/hourStandard Deviation 6.74
LacosamideAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 31 hour - 32 hour8.93 mins/hourStandard Deviation 8.56
LacosamideAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 15 hour - 16 hour7.21 mins/hourStandard Deviation 6.33
LacosamideAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 47 hour - 48 hour8.93 mins/hourStandard Deviation 8.56
LacosamideAbsolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 23 hour - 24 hour8.69 mins/hourStandard Deviation 8.06
Secondary

Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG

Baseline seizure burden was calculated as total duration of seizures (in minutes) between -2 and 0 hours before the first dose of study medication divided by total duration of interpretable video-EEG (in hours) in same period. Seizure burden in Evaluation Period was calculated as total duration of seizures between 1 and 3 hours after first dose of study medication divided by duration of interpretable video-EEG available in same period. Percent change in seizure burden for Evaluation period was calculated as seizure burden at Baseline minus seizure burden at respective time point, divided by seizure burden in Baseline Period, multiplied by 100. Participants classified in one of following categories based on their percent reduction from Baseline to Evaluation Period: \< -25% (worsening), -25% to \<25% (no change), 25% to \<50%, 50% to \<80%, and \>=80%. Percent change in seizure burden was analyzed and categorized such that positive value indicates reduction in seizure burden from baseline.

Time frame: During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline

Population: FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active ComparatorCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: -25% to <25%0.0 Percentage of participants
Active ComparatorCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: 50% to <80%22.2 Percentage of participants
Active ComparatorCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: 25% to <50%11.1 Percentage of participants
Active ComparatorCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: >=80%44.4 Percentage of participants
Active ComparatorCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: <-25%22.2 Percentage of participants
LacosamideCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: >=80%81.8 Percentage of participants
LacosamideCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: <-25%0.0 Percentage of participants
LacosamideCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: -25% to <25%9.1 Percentage of participants
LacosamideCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: 25% to <50%9.1 Percentage of participants
LacosamideCategorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGEvaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: 50% to <80%0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation a Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG

A responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: A reduction in seizure burden from Baseline of \>=80% regardless of baseline seizure severity. Percentage of Participants With at least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation (starting 1 hour after treatment) of a Video-EEG Compared with the Baseline Video-EEG were reported.

Time frame: During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline

Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active ComparatorPercentage of Participants With at Least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation a Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG44.4 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Participants With at Least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation a Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG60.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Reported by the Investigator

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. TEAEs are defined as AEs which have onset on or after the start date and time of initial study medication administration.

Time frame: From first administration of study treatment to the End of Safety Follow-up Period (up to Day 42)

Population: The SS consisted of all enrolled study participants who took at least 1 dose of the randomized treatment. The safety population was based on actual treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active ComparatorPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Reported by the Investigator41.7 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Reported by the Investigator64.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

The ECG treatment-emergent marked abnormalities values are based on grade 2 toxicity based on abnormal values or clinical experience based on investigator's discretion. Participants randomized to Lacosamide and enrolled under this version of the protocol have planned assessments at Screening, 1-6 hours, 48, and 96 hours only. For participants randomized to Active Comparator treatment, only the Screening assessment was applicable.

Time frame: Active Comparator: Screening; Lacosamide: Screening, 1-6 hours, 48 and 96 hours

Population: The SS consisted of all enrolled study participants who took at least 1 dose of the randomized treatment. The safety population was based on actual treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants with a non-missing interpretation for this assessment and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active ComparatorPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)Screening: Abnormal Clinically significant0.0 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)Screening: Abnormal Clinically significant0.0 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)1-6 hours: Abnormal Clinically significant0.0 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)48 hours: Abnormal Clinically significant0.0 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)96 hours: Abnormal Clinically significant0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Responders at the End of the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period

A responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: At least 80% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized as having nonsevere seizure burden during Baseline OR At least 50% reduction of seizure burden in participants who had at least one 30-minute period of severe seizure burden during Baseline. The denominator for the percentages was based on the number of participants with video- EEG data available at the 48 hour time point.

Time frame: Across the first 48 hours of Treatment Period

Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active ComparatorPercentage of Responders at the End of the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period66.7 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Responders at the End of the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period76.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Responders in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG

A responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to the study medication administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: - At least 80% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized by the Investigator as having non-severe seizure burden during Baseline OR - At least 50% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized by the Investigator as having severe seizure burden during Baseline.

Time frame: During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline

Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active ComparatorPercentage of Responders in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG66.7 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Responders in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG60.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at Baseline

Seizure free was defined as 100% reduction in seizure burden or having no seizures in the assessment period (23 to 24 hours after first dose) from Baseline. For the study participants with severe seizure burden at Baseline (as determined by the Investigator), the numerator was defined as the number of participants with severe seizure burden at Baseline who had no seizures between 23 and 24 hours after the start of the Treatment Period. The denominator for the percentages was based on the number of participants with video-EEG data available at the 24 hour time point. Here, N='overall number of participants analyzed' and n='number analyzed' in categories.

Time frame: 24 hours after the start of Treatment Period, compared to Baseline

Population: FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, N=participants who were evaluable for this assessment and n= participants who were evaluable for specified seizure burden categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active ComparatorPercentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at BaselineSevere Seizure Burden33.3 percentage of participants
Active ComparatorPercentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at BaselineNon-severe Seizure Burden100.0 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at BaselineSevere Seizure Burden66.7 percentage of participants
LacosamidePercentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at BaselineNon-severe Seizure Burden62.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG

The percent change in seizure burden for the 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour time points was calculated as the seizure burden at Baseline minus the seizure burden at the respective time point, divided by the seizure burden in the Baseline Period, multiplied by 100. Percent change in seizure burden was analyzed such that a positive value indicates a reduction in seizure burden from baseline.

Time frame: Treatment Period: 7-8 hours, 15-16 hours, 23-24 hours, 31-32 hours, 39-40 hours, 47-48 hours, compared to Baseline

Population: FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active ComparatorPercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 7 hour - 8 hour39.85 percent changeStandard Deviation 147.33
Active ComparatorPercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 15 hour - 16 hour48.22 percent changeStandard Deviation 116.94
Active ComparatorPercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 23 hour - 24 hour100.00 percent changeStandard Deviation 0
Active ComparatorPercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 31 hour - 32 hour100.00 percent changeStandard Deviation 0
Active ComparatorPercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 39 hour - 40 hour77.13 percent changeStandard Deviation 45.73
Active ComparatorPercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 47 hour - 48 hour100.00 percent changeStandard Deviation 0
LacosamidePercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 39 hour - 40 hour100.00 percent changeStandard Deviation 0
LacosamidePercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 7 hour - 8 hour80.92 percent changeStandard Deviation 45.56
LacosamidePercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 31 hour - 32 hour100.00 percent changeStandard Deviation 0
LacosamidePercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 15 hour - 16 hour93.19 percent changeStandard Deviation 21.53
LacosamidePercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 47 hour - 48 hour100.00 percent changeStandard Deviation 0
LacosamidePercent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEGTreatment, 23 hour - 24 hour99.03 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.05
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Lacosamide

Serum concentrations of lacosamide were measured and concentration data were summarized. PK sparse sampling was performed.

Time frame: Day 1: 30-90 minutes and 6 - 8 hours after start of first infusion, 30 - 90 minutes and 6 - 8 hours after start of second or third infusion, Days 2, 3 and 4

Population: The Pharmacokinetic Per-Protocol Set (PK-PPS) consisted of all study participants who provide at least 1 measurable serum sample (with recorded sampling time) on at least 1 post-Baseline visit with documented study drug intake times. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Active ComparatorSerum Concentration of LacosamideDay 1: 30 - 90 minutes after start of first infusion7.003 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.6
Active ComparatorSerum Concentration of LacosamideDay 1: 6 - 8 hours after start of first infusion5.949 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.6
Active ComparatorSerum Concentration of LacosamideDay 1: 30 - 90 minutes after start of second or third infusion13.27 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.4
Active ComparatorSerum Concentration of LacosamideDay 1: 6 - 8 hours after start of second or third infusion9.607 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.8
Active ComparatorSerum Concentration of LacosamideDay 2NA microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Active ComparatorSerum Concentration of LacosamideDay 3NA microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Active ComparatorSerum Concentration of LacosamideDay 4NA microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Secondary

Time to Response Across the 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG

Time to response where response was defined as a reduction in seizure burden from Baseline of at least 80% in participants with non-severe seizure burden, and of at least 50% for participants with severe seizure burden. Time to response was censored at the date/time the participant received rescue medication or stopped video-EEG monitoring, or otherwise at the end of the 48-hour period.

Time frame: Across the first 48 hours of Treatment Period, compared to Baseline

Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active ComparatorTime to Response Across the 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG3.0 hours
LacosamideTime to Response Across the 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG3.0 hours
Secondary

Time to Seizure Freedom Across the First 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG

Seizure freedom was defined as 0 minutes of seizures in a 1-hour period (or 2-hour period for the 3-hour time point) and was analyzed across the 48 hours. The time to seizure freedom was measured in hours, defined as the first time point when the response criterion was met minus the date and time of the first dose of randomized study medication administration. Time to seizure freedom was censored at the time of receiving rescue medication, stopping video-EEG monitoring or otherwise at 48 hours after first dose.

Time frame: Across the first 48 hours of Treatment Period, compared to Baseline

Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active ComparatorTime to Seizure Freedom Across the First 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG8.0 hours
LacosamideTime to Seizure Freedom Across the First 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG3.0 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026