Electroencephalographic Neonatal Seizures, Epilepsy
Conditions
Keywords
electroencephalographic neonatal seizures, epilepsy, neonatal study participants, Vimpat, lacosamide, LCM, pediatric, video-EEG
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) versus an Active Comparator chosen based on standard of care (StOC) in severe and nonsevere seizure burden (defined as total minutes of electroencephalographic neonatal seizures (ENS) per hour) in neonates with seizures that are not adequately controlled with previous anti-epileptic drug (AED) treatment.
Interventions
Study participants will receive lacosamide (LCM) as an intravenous (iv) infusion during the Treatment Period.
Study participants may receive lacosamide (LCM) as an oral solution during the Extension Period.
Active Comparator treatment will be chosen and dosed based on StOC (per local practice and treatment guidelines).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participant must be ≥34 weeks of corrected gestational age (CGA), \<46 weeks of CGA, and \<28 days of postnatal age (PNA) * Participants who have confirmation on video-electroencephalogram (EEG) of ≥2 minutes of cumulative electroencephalographic neonatal seizures (ENS) or ≥3 identifiable ENS prior to entering the Treatment Period * Participants must have received either phenobarbital (PB), levetiracetam (LEV), or midazolam (MDZ) (in any combination) before entering the study * Participant weighs at least 2.3 kg at the time of enrollment Informed consent * An Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved written informed consent form (ICF) is signed and dated by the participant's parent(s) or legal representative(s)
Exclusion criteria
* Participant with seizures responding to correction of metabolic disturbances (hypoglycemia, hypomagnesemia, or hypocalcemia) or with seizures for which a targeted, known treatment is available * Participant has seizures related to prenatal maternal drug use or drug withdrawal * Participant has a clinically relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, in the opinion of the investigator * Participant receiving treatment with phenytoin (PHT), lidocaine (LDC), or other sodium channel blockers at any time
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Seizure Burden Measured in the Evaluation Video-electroencephalogram (Video-EEG) Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline | Baseline seizure burden was defined as seizure burden measured on the continuous video-EEG (total electroencephalographic neonatal seizures (ENS) in minutes per hour) during a period of up to 2 hours immediately prior to the first administration of study drug. An ENS was defined as an EEG seizure lasting for at least 10 seconds on video-EEG. The seizure burden in the Evaluation Period was calculated as the total duration of seizures between 1 and 3 hours after the first dose of study medication divided by the duration of interpretable video-EEG available in the same period. Change in seizure burden measured in the Evaluation video-EEG compared with the Baseline video-EEG was analyzed such that a positive value indicates a reduction in seizure burden from baseline. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With at Least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation a Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline | A responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: A reduction in seizure burden from Baseline of \>=80% regardless of baseline seizure severity. Percentage of Participants With at least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation (starting 1 hour after treatment) of a Video-EEG Compared with the Baseline Video-EEG were reported. |
| Time to Response Across the 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Across the first 48 hours of Treatment Period, compared to Baseline | Time to response where response was defined as a reduction in seizure burden from Baseline of at least 80% in participants with non-severe seizure burden, and of at least 50% for participants with severe seizure burden. Time to response was censored at the date/time the participant received rescue medication or stopped video-EEG monitoring, or otherwise at the end of the 48-hour period. |
| Time to Seizure Freedom Across the First 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Across the first 48 hours of Treatment Period, compared to Baseline | Seizure freedom was defined as 0 minutes of seizures in a 1-hour period (or 2-hour period for the 3-hour time point) and was analyzed across the 48 hours. The time to seizure freedom was measured in hours, defined as the first time point when the response criterion was met minus the date and time of the first dose of randomized study medication administration. Time to seizure freedom was censored at the time of receiving rescue medication, stopping video-EEG monitoring or otherwise at 48 hours after first dose. |
| Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment Period: 7-8 hours, 15-16 hours, 23-24 hours, 31-32 hours, 39-40 hours, 47-48 hours, compared to Baseline | Baseline seizure burden was calculated as total duration of seizures (in minutes) between -2 hour and 0 hours before first dose of study medication divided by total duration of interpretable video-EEG (in hours) in the same period. Seizure burden for 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour time points was calculated as total duration of seizures in the hour prior to time point divided by duration of interpretable video-EEG available in same period. If \<30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG were available in the 1 hour prior to the time point, response was calculated based on seizure burden for most recent 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG in the 2 hours (for 8 and 16 hour points) or 4 hours (for 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour points) prior to time point. The 30 minutes of video-EEG did not need to be continuous. Absolute reduction in seizure burden for these time points was calculated as seizure burden in Baseline Period minus seizure burden at that time point. |
| Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment Period: 7-8 hours, 15-16 hours, 23-24 hours, 31-32 hours, 39-40 hours, 47-48 hours, compared to Baseline | The percent change in seizure burden for the 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour time points was calculated as the seizure burden at Baseline minus the seizure burden at the respective time point, divided by the seizure burden in the Baseline Period, multiplied by 100. Percent change in seizure burden was analyzed such that a positive value indicates a reduction in seizure burden from baseline. |
| Percentage of Responders in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline | A responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to the study medication administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: - At least 80% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized by the Investigator as having non-severe seizure burden during Baseline OR - At least 50% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized by the Investigator as having severe seizure burden during Baseline. |
| Percentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at Baseline | 24 hours after the start of Treatment Period, compared to Baseline | Seizure free was defined as 100% reduction in seizure burden or having no seizures in the assessment period (23 to 24 hours after first dose) from Baseline. For the study participants with severe seizure burden at Baseline (as determined by the Investigator), the numerator was defined as the number of participants with severe seizure burden at Baseline who had no seizures between 23 and 24 hours after the start of the Treatment Period. The denominator for the percentages was based on the number of participants with video-EEG data available at the 24 hour time point. Here, N='overall number of participants analyzed' and n='number analyzed' in categories. |
| Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline | Baseline seizure burden was calculated as total duration of seizures (in minutes) between -2 and 0 hours before the first dose of study medication divided by total duration of interpretable video-EEG (in hours) in same period. Seizure burden in Evaluation Period was calculated as total duration of seizures between 1 and 3 hours after first dose of study medication divided by duration of interpretable video-EEG available in same period. Percent change in seizure burden for Evaluation period was calculated as seizure burden at Baseline minus seizure burden at respective time point, divided by seizure burden in Baseline Period, multiplied by 100. Participants classified in one of following categories based on their percent reduction from Baseline to Evaluation Period: \< -25% (worsening), -25% to \<25% (no change), 25% to \<50%, 50% to \<80%, and \>=80%. Percent change in seizure burden was analyzed and categorized such that positive value indicates reduction in seizure burden from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Reported by the Investigator | From first administration of study treatment to the End of Safety Follow-up Period (up to Day 42) | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. TEAEs are defined as AEs which have onset on or after the start date and time of initial study medication administration. |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | Active Comparator: Screening; Lacosamide: Screening, 1-6 hours, 48 and 96 hours | The ECG treatment-emergent marked abnormalities values are based on grade 2 toxicity based on abnormal values or clinical experience based on investigator's discretion. Participants randomized to Lacosamide and enrolled under this version of the protocol have planned assessments at Screening, 1-6 hours, 48, and 96 hours only. For participants randomized to Active Comparator treatment, only the Screening assessment was applicable. |
| Serum Concentration of Lacosamide | Day 1: 30-90 minutes and 6 - 8 hours after start of first infusion, 30 - 90 minutes and 6 - 8 hours after start of second or third infusion, Days 2, 3 and 4 | Serum concentrations of lacosamide were measured and concentration data were summarized. PK sparse sampling was performed. |
| Percentage of Responders at the End of the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period | Across the first 48 hours of Treatment Period | A responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: At least 80% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized as having nonsevere seizure burden during Baseline OR At least 50% reduction of seizure burden in participants who had at least one 30-minute period of severe seizure burden during Baseline. The denominator for the percentages was based on the number of participants with video- EEG data available at the 48 hour time point. |
Countries
Australia, Canada, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study started to enrol participants in March 2021 and concluded in October 2024.
Pre-assignment details
The Participant Flow refers to the Safety set. This study was ended after agreed Pediatric investigation plan (PIP) modification, not linked to safety reasons.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator Study participants randomized to receive Active Comparator (chosen and dosed based on standard of care (StOC) per local practice and treatment guidelines) in the Treatment Period. After the Treatment Period, study participants had the option to continue to receive randomized Active Comparator in the Extension Period (up to 28 days of postnatal age). Study participants (whether they discontinued randomized treatment during the Treatment Period, completed the Extension Period, were discharged from the hospital, or reached 28 days of postnatal age) then entered the 14-day Safety Follow-up (SFU) Period with optional down titration. | 12 |
| Lacosamide Study participants randomized to receive lacosamide 10 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL) 3 times a day as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes for up to 96 hours in the Treatment Period. After the Treatment Period, study participants had the option to continue to receive randomized lacosamide in the Extension Period (up to 28 days of postnatal age), being switched to oral dosing of lacosamide as soon as medically possible. Study participants (whether they discontinued randomized treatment during the Treatment Period, completed the Extension Period, were discharged from the hospital, or reached 28 days of postnatal age) then entered the 14-day SFU Period with optional down titration. | 14 |
| Total | 26 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrollment Period (Up to 36 Hours) | Adverse Event | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Enrollment Period (Up to 36 Hours) | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Enrollment Period (Up to 36 Hours) | Withdrawal by Parent/Guardian | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 96 Hours) | Consent withdrawn by parent/guardian,not due to AE | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Active Comparator | Lacosamide | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 3.1 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 | 4.1 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 | 3.7 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 |
| Age, Customized 0-<=27 days | 12 Participants | 14 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 7 Participants | 6 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black or African American | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Missing | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Other or Mixed | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 8 Participants | 11 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 12 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 3 | 0 / 12 | 1 / 14 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 3 | 5 / 12 | 8 / 14 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 3 | 0 / 12 | 2 / 14 |
Outcome results
Change in Seizure Burden Measured in the Evaluation Video-electroencephalogram (Video-EEG) Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG
Baseline seizure burden was defined as seizure burden measured on the continuous video-EEG (total electroencephalographic neonatal seizures (ENS) in minutes per hour) during a period of up to 2 hours immediately prior to the first administration of study drug. An ENS was defined as an EEG seizure lasting for at least 10 seconds on video-EEG. The seizure burden in the Evaluation Period was calculated as the total duration of seizures between 1 and 3 hours after the first dose of study medication divided by the duration of interpretable video-EEG available in the same period. Change in seizure burden measured in the Evaluation video-EEG compared with the Baseline video-EEG was analyzed such that a positive value indicates a reduction in seizure burden from baseline.
Time frame: During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Change in Seizure Burden Measured in the Evaluation Video-electroencephalogram (Video-EEG) Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 2.45 minute per hour (min/hour) | Standard Deviation 14.83 |
| Lacosamide | Change in Seizure Burden Measured in the Evaluation Video-electroencephalogram (Video-EEG) Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 6.64 minute per hour (min/hour) | Standard Deviation 6.55 |
Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG
Baseline seizure burden was calculated as total duration of seizures (in minutes) between -2 hour and 0 hours before first dose of study medication divided by total duration of interpretable video-EEG (in hours) in the same period. Seizure burden for 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour time points was calculated as total duration of seizures in the hour prior to time point divided by duration of interpretable video-EEG available in same period. If \<30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG were available in the 1 hour prior to the time point, response was calculated based on seizure burden for most recent 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG in the 2 hours (for 8 and 16 hour points) or 4 hours (for 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour points) prior to time point. The 30 minutes of video-EEG did not need to be continuous. Absolute reduction in seizure burden for these time points was calculated as seizure burden in Baseline Period minus seizure burden at that time point.
Time frame: Treatment Period: 7-8 hours, 15-16 hours, 23-24 hours, 31-32 hours, 39-40 hours, 47-48 hours, compared to Baseline
Population: FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 7 hour - 8 hour | -2.74 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 15.53 |
| Active Comparator | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 15 hour - 16 hour | 3.63 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 5.28 |
| Active Comparator | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 23 hour - 24 hour | 5.08 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 4.81 |
| Active Comparator | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 31 hour - 32 hour | 5.71 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 5.09 |
| Active Comparator | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 39 hour - 40 hour | 4.43 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| Active Comparator | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 47 hour - 48 hour | 4.84 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 5.44 |
| Lacosamide | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 39 hour - 40 hour | 8.93 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 8.56 |
| Lacosamide | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 7 hour - 8 hour | 6.30 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 6.74 |
| Lacosamide | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 31 hour - 32 hour | 8.93 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 8.56 |
| Lacosamide | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 15 hour - 16 hour | 7.21 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 6.33 |
| Lacosamide | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 47 hour - 48 hour | 8.93 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 8.56 |
| Lacosamide | Absolute Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 23 hour - 24 hour | 8.69 mins/hour | Standard Deviation 8.06 |
Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG
Baseline seizure burden was calculated as total duration of seizures (in minutes) between -2 and 0 hours before the first dose of study medication divided by total duration of interpretable video-EEG (in hours) in same period. Seizure burden in Evaluation Period was calculated as total duration of seizures between 1 and 3 hours after first dose of study medication divided by duration of interpretable video-EEG available in same period. Percent change in seizure burden for Evaluation period was calculated as seizure burden at Baseline minus seizure burden at respective time point, divided by seizure burden in Baseline Period, multiplied by 100. Participants classified in one of following categories based on their percent reduction from Baseline to Evaluation Period: \< -25% (worsening), -25% to \<25% (no change), 25% to \<50%, 50% to \<80%, and \>=80%. Percent change in seizure burden was analyzed and categorized such that positive value indicates reduction in seizure burden from baseline.
Time frame: During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline
Population: FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: -25% to <25% | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Active Comparator | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: 50% to <80% | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| Active Comparator | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: 25% to <50% | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Active Comparator | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: >=80% | 44.4 Percentage of participants |
| Active Comparator | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: <-25% | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: >=80% | 81.8 Percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: <-25% | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: -25% to <25% | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: 25% to <50% | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Categorized Percentage of Participants With Change in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Evaluation, 1 hour - 3 hour: 50% to <80% | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation a Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG
A responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: A reduction in seizure burden from Baseline of \>=80% regardless of baseline seizure severity. Percentage of Participants With at least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation (starting 1 hour after treatment) of a Video-EEG Compared with the Baseline Video-EEG were reported.
Time frame: During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline
Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Percentage of Participants With at Least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation a Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 44.4 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Participants With at Least 80% Reduction in Seizure Burden in the Evaluation a Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 60.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Reported by the Investigator
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. TEAEs are defined as AEs which have onset on or after the start date and time of initial study medication administration.
Time frame: From first administration of study treatment to the End of Safety Follow-up Period (up to Day 42)
Population: The SS consisted of all enrolled study participants who took at least 1 dose of the randomized treatment. The safety population was based on actual treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Reported by the Investigator | 41.7 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Reported by the Investigator | 64.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
The ECG treatment-emergent marked abnormalities values are based on grade 2 toxicity based on abnormal values or clinical experience based on investigator's discretion. Participants randomized to Lacosamide and enrolled under this version of the protocol have planned assessments at Screening, 1-6 hours, 48, and 96 hours only. For participants randomized to Active Comparator treatment, only the Screening assessment was applicable.
Time frame: Active Comparator: Screening; Lacosamide: Screening, 1-6 hours, 48 and 96 hours
Population: The SS consisted of all enrolled study participants who took at least 1 dose of the randomized treatment. The safety population was based on actual treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants with a non-missing interpretation for this assessment and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | Screening: Abnormal Clinically significant | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | Screening: Abnormal Clinically significant | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 1-6 hours: Abnormal Clinically significant | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 48 hours: Abnormal Clinically significant | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Marked Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 96 hours: Abnormal Clinically significant | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Responders at the End of the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period
A responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: At least 80% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized as having nonsevere seizure burden during Baseline OR At least 50% reduction of seizure burden in participants who had at least one 30-minute period of severe seizure burden during Baseline. The denominator for the percentages was based on the number of participants with video- EEG data available at the 48 hour time point.
Time frame: Across the first 48 hours of Treatment Period
Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Percentage of Responders at the End of the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Responders at the End of the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period | 76.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Responders in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG
A responder is defined as a study participant who achieved the following reduction in seizure burden without need for rescue medication, compared with the seizure burden measured during the Baseline Period immediately prior to the study medication administration, evaluated for a 2-hour period starting 1 hour after the start of initial treatment: - At least 80% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized by the Investigator as having non-severe seizure burden during Baseline OR - At least 50% reduction of seizure burden in participants who were categorized by the Investigator as having severe seizure burden during Baseline.
Time frame: During 2-hour Evaluation starting 1 hour after initial treatment (up to 2 hours), compared to Baseline
Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Percentage of Responders in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Responders in the Evaluation Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 60.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at Baseline
Seizure free was defined as 100% reduction in seizure burden or having no seizures in the assessment period (23 to 24 hours after first dose) from Baseline. For the study participants with severe seizure burden at Baseline (as determined by the Investigator), the numerator was defined as the number of participants with severe seizure burden at Baseline who had no seizures between 23 and 24 hours after the start of the Treatment Period. The denominator for the percentages was based on the number of participants with video-EEG data available at the 24 hour time point. Here, N='overall number of participants analyzed' and n='number analyzed' in categories.
Time frame: 24 hours after the start of Treatment Period, compared to Baseline
Population: FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, N=participants who were evaluable for this assessment and n= participants who were evaluable for specified seizure burden categories.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Percentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at Baseline | Severe Seizure Burden | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Active Comparator | Percentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at Baseline | Non-severe Seizure Burden | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at Baseline | Severe Seizure Burden | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Lacosamide | Percentage of Study Participants Who Are Seizure-free (100% Reduction in Seizure Burden From Baseline) at 24 Hours After Start of the Treatment Period, Categorized by Study Participants With Non Severe or Severe Seizure Burden at Baseline | Non-severe Seizure Burden | 62.5 percentage of participants |
Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG
The percent change in seizure burden for the 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 hour time points was calculated as the seizure burden at Baseline minus the seizure burden at the respective time point, divided by the seizure burden in the Baseline Period, multiplied by 100. Percent change in seizure burden was analyzed such that a positive value indicates a reduction in seizure burden from baseline.
Time frame: Treatment Period: 7-8 hours, 15-16 hours, 23-24 hours, 31-32 hours, 39-40 hours, 47-48 hours, compared to Baseline
Population: FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. FAS population was based on randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 7 hour - 8 hour | 39.85 percent change | Standard Deviation 147.33 |
| Active Comparator | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 15 hour - 16 hour | 48.22 percent change | Standard Deviation 116.94 |
| Active Comparator | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 23 hour - 24 hour | 100.00 percent change | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Active Comparator | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 31 hour - 32 hour | 100.00 percent change | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Active Comparator | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 39 hour - 40 hour | 77.13 percent change | Standard Deviation 45.73 |
| Active Comparator | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 47 hour - 48 hour | 100.00 percent change | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Lacosamide | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 39 hour - 40 hour | 100.00 percent change | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Lacosamide | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 7 hour - 8 hour | 80.92 percent change | Standard Deviation 45.56 |
| Lacosamide | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 31 hour - 32 hour | 100.00 percent change | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Lacosamide | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 15 hour - 16 hour | 93.19 percent change | Standard Deviation 21.53 |
| Lacosamide | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 47 hour - 48 hour | 100.00 percent change | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Lacosamide | Percent Change in Seizure Burden Across the First 48-hours of the Treatment Period Measured by Continuous Video-EEG Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | Treatment, 23 hour - 24 hour | 99.03 percent change | Standard Deviation 3.05 |
Serum Concentration of Lacosamide
Serum concentrations of lacosamide were measured and concentration data were summarized. PK sparse sampling was performed.
Time frame: Day 1: 30-90 minutes and 6 - 8 hours after start of first infusion, 30 - 90 minutes and 6 - 8 hours after start of second or third infusion, Days 2, 3 and 4
Population: The Pharmacokinetic Per-Protocol Set (PK-PPS) consisted of all study participants who provide at least 1 measurable serum sample (with recorded sampling time) on at least 1 post-Baseline visit with documented study drug intake times. Here, overall number of participants analyzed included all participants who were evaluable for this assessment and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Serum Concentration of Lacosamide | Day 1: 30 - 90 minutes after start of first infusion | 7.003 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.6 |
| Active Comparator | Serum Concentration of Lacosamide | Day 1: 6 - 8 hours after start of first infusion | 5.949 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.6 |
| Active Comparator | Serum Concentration of Lacosamide | Day 1: 30 - 90 minutes after start of second or third infusion | 13.27 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.4 |
| Active Comparator | Serum Concentration of Lacosamide | Day 1: 6 - 8 hours after start of second or third infusion | 9.607 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.8 |
| Active Comparator | Serum Concentration of Lacosamide | Day 2 | NA microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | — |
| Active Comparator | Serum Concentration of Lacosamide | Day 3 | NA microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | — |
| Active Comparator | Serum Concentration of Lacosamide | Day 4 | NA microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | — |
Time to Response Across the 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG
Time to response where response was defined as a reduction in seizure burden from Baseline of at least 80% in participants with non-severe seizure burden, and of at least 50% for participants with severe seizure burden. Time to response was censored at the date/time the participant received rescue medication or stopped video-EEG monitoring, or otherwise at the end of the 48-hour period.
Time frame: Across the first 48 hours of Treatment Period, compared to Baseline
Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Time to Response Across the 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 3.0 hours |
| Lacosamide | Time to Response Across the 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 3.0 hours |
Time to Seizure Freedom Across the First 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG
Seizure freedom was defined as 0 minutes of seizures in a 1-hour period (or 2-hour period for the 3-hour time point) and was analyzed across the 48 hours. The time to seizure freedom was measured in hours, defined as the first time point when the response criterion was met minus the date and time of the first dose of randomized study medication administration. Time to seizure freedom was censored at the time of receiving rescue medication, stopping video-EEG monitoring or otherwise at 48 hours after first dose.
Time frame: Across the first 48 hours of Treatment Period, compared to Baseline
Population: The FAS consisted of all study participants in the SS who had a minimum of 30 minutes of interpretable video-EEG data from both Baseline and the period between 1 and 3 hours (Evaluation Period) after randomization to the initial study medication treatment. The FAS population was based on randomized treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator | Time to Seizure Freedom Across the First 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 8.0 hours |
| Lacosamide | Time to Seizure Freedom Across the First 48-hour Treatment Period Compared With the Baseline Video-EEG | 3.0 hours |