Skip to content

Comparison of Laser Lithotripsy With and Without Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation (SURE)

A Prospective, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation(SURE)Using the CVAC™ Aspiration System Compared to Basketing for the Removal of Renal Calculi Following Laser Lithotripsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04519294
Enrollment
132
Registered
2020-08-19
Start date
2021-06-16
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2026-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Stone, Renal Stone, Urolithiasis

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of a treatment for removing kidney stones called the SURE procedure for stone evacuation to the standard treatment using a basket for stone removal.

Interventions

DEVICESURE

The SURE stone evacuation procedure is a technique intended to more easily and completely remove a kidney stone during a kidney stone treatment. The urologist first uses a laser to break the kidney stone into small pieces. Then with the SURE procedure, the pieces are gently vacuumed out of the kidney instead of retrieving the pieces one-by-one with a basket or leaving them to pass naturally in the urine. Basketing is allowed and might be used with the SURE procedure, if needed to remove some small stones.

DEVICEStandard Ureteroscopy (Basketing)

This is a treatment in which the urologist uses a laser to break a kidney stone into small pieces and then uses a tool called a basket to retrieve the pieces one at a time.

Sponsors

Calyxo, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Candidate for ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy; * Presence of renal stone(s); * Be willing and able to return for all study-related follow up procedures; and, * Have been informed of the nature of the study, agreeing to its requirements, and have signed the IRB approved informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* BMI \> 45; * Significant comorbidities; * Bladder, ureteral or kidney abnormalities; * Pregnant individuals; or * Unable to meet the treatment and follow up protocol requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone Free Rate (SFR) - Zero Fragments30 DaysThe primary efficacy endpoint is the SFR, where stone free status is defined as zero residual fragments at 30 days observed on non-contrast CT (NCCT) (1.25mm slice thickness) by blinded central reviewer(s). The SFR is calculated by determining the number of subjects in each treatment arm with a stone free status of zero fragments and dividing that by the total number of subjects treated in the respective treatment arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual Stone Volume (RSV)30 DaysA continuous quantitative measure of remaining stone volume following intervention, assessed via post-procedural imaging on NCCT (1.25mm slice thickness) by blinded central reviewer(s).
Stone Clearance (% Reduction in Stone Volume)30 DaysPercent reduction (\[Baseline stone volume- 30-Day stone volume\] / Baseline stone volume) in stone volume following intervention, assessed via post-procedural imaging on NCCT (1.25mm slice thickness) by blinded central reviewer(s). A positive result indicates a decrease in stone volume removed during the procedure; a negative value indicates an increase in stone volume following the procedure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

In total, 132 subject were enrolled and treated. Of the subjects, 123 were randomized. Of these subjects, subjects whose study participation was discontinued prior to the 30-Day CT, who had poor CT quality, major protocol deviations, or who had their procedures aborted were not included in the efficacy analysis. A total of 101 subjects qualified for the efficacy analysis.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Customized
Age
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White (Not Hispanic)
80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants
Total stone burden17 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Total stone volume610 mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 510

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 670 / 65
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 675 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 672 / 65

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026