Skip to content

Model-based Defining of Subtypes of Depression and Optimal Treatment: an Integrated Techniques Module.

Model-based Defining of Subtypes of Depression and Optimal Treatment: an Integrated Techniques Module in Multidimensional Omics for Peripheral Biomarkers.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04518592
Enrollment
300
Registered
2020-08-19
Start date
2020-12-22
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

In this proposal, the investigators aim to explore the clinical subtypes and biological markers to personalize the use of antidepressants in MDD. By stratifying the subjects with (versus without) remission and treatment response, the biological markers are expected to have important prediction effects in future clinical practice.

Detailed description

In this proposal, through the integration of genome, transcriptome, protein, metabolic group, microbial group and immune cell subtype of multidimensional omics data to construct the curative effect of forecast model.The investigators aim to explore the clinical subtypes and biological markers to personalize the use of antidepressants in MDD. By stratifying the subjects with (versus without) remission and treatment response, the biological markers are expected to have important prediction effects in future clinical practice.Ultimate aim is to solve the depression medication selection dilemma of trial and error, reduce medical costs, improving depression treatment experience.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Shanghai Mental Health Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female subjects aged 18-65 years, outpatients or inpatients. 2. Meets the DSM-V criteria for Severe Major Depressive Disorder ; a single episode(296.21、296.22、296.23)or recurrent episode (296.31、296.32、296.33); 3. MADRS score greater than or equal to 24 in baseline; 4. HAMD-17 score greater than or equal to 20 in baseline. 5. Patients have learned and voluntarily participated in the study, and have to sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Meets the DSM-V criteria for other mental disorder(schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, bipolar and related disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, somatic symptom and related disorders, etc ). 2. Patient has survived suicide attempt , or may have a significant risk for suicidal behavior ,or with a score of \>3 on suicidal thoughts item 10 on the MADRS. 3. Depressive episode of an organic mental disorder secondary to a systemic disease or a central nervous system disease, such as depressive episode secondary to hypothyroidism. 4. Serious and instable body disease such as cerebrovascular disease, respiratory disease, blood disease, liver and kidney disease, disease of internal secretion, nervous system and other systemic disease. 5. any history of seizures or other organic brain diseases. 6. History of alcohol or drug abuse (besides nicotine) over the last 6 months 7. Serious and instable body disease such as cerebrovascular disease, liver and kidney disease, disease of internal secretion (abnormal thyroid function), blood disease; any history of seizures or other organic brain diseases. 8. Subjects who can't take drug or have an operation history which affect drug metabolism. 9. Clinically significant changes in ECG or laboratory tests, including \>1.5X upper limit of normal liver function、over the limit of normal renal function and blood sugar、abnormal cardiac troponins、obvious abnormity in the thyroid function 10. Pregnant or lactating women and women of childbearing potential throughout the study period; men who have the desire of fertility within three months; 11. Participation in other clinical studies in the nearly 1 month before screen. 12. Other conditions which, in the investigator's judgment, render patients unsuitable for the clinical study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
reductive scores of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS)assess the scale at baseline and week 8.change in MADRS scores from baseline and week 8

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rateassess the scale at baseline and week 8.Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS) ≤ 10 and/or Hamilton Depression Scale-17(HAMD-17) ≤7
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS) scoresassess the scale at baseline and week 4, 8.Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS) scores at baseline and week 4, 8
Subtraction scoreassess the scale at baseline and week 4, 8.Hamilton Depression Scale-17(HAMD17) total score after 8 weeks treatment compared with the baseline subtraction score.
The overall evaluation of illnessassess the scale at baseline and week 4, 8.the CGI-s (Clinical Global Impression scale - Severity of Illness)rating changes compared to the baseline and CGI - I score.
effective rateassess the scale at baseline and week 8.ratio of points of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS) and/or Hamilton Depression Scale-17(HAMD-17)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Indexassess the scale at baseline and week 4, 8.the scores changes compared to the baseline
The Montreal Cognitive Assessmentassess the scale at baseline and week 4, 8.the scores changes compared to the baseline
The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (16-Item) (Self-Report)assess the scale at baseline and week 4, 8.the scores changes compared to the baseline
Hamilton Anxiety Scaleassess the scale at baseline and week 4, 8.the scores changes compared to the baseline

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contacthuafang Li, Phd
lhlh_5@163.com86-21-64387250

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026