Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of GMRx2 Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Hypertension

Efficacy and Safety of GMRx2 (a Single Pill Combination Containing Telmisartan/Amlodipine/Indapamide) Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04518306
Acronym
GMRx2_PCT
Enrollment
755
Registered
2020-08-19
Start date
2021-06-14
Completion date
2023-10-18
Last updated
2025-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Brief summary

Recent hypertension guidelines recommend combination therapy as initial treatment for many or most patients. Several trials suggest triple low-dose combination therapy may be highly effective in terms of achieving blood pressure control without increasing adverse effects. This trial is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of GMRx2 in participants with high blood pressure compared to placebo.

Detailed description

TRIAL DRUG: GMRx2: single pill combination of telmisartan/amlodipine/indapamide Dose version 1: telmisartan 10 mg/amlodipine 1.25 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg Dose version 2: telmisartan 20 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg INDICATION: Hypertension TRIAL TITLE: Efficacy and safety of GMRx2 compared to placebo for the treatment of hypertension. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of GMRx2 compared to placebo for the treatment of hypertension. INTERVENTION: A 2-week single-blind placebo run-in will be followed by a 4-week double-blind period with randomization to GMRx2 dose version 1, GMRx2 dose version 2 or placebo.

Interventions

DRUGTelmisartan 10 mg/amlodipine 1.25 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg

Oral tablets

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

George Medicines PTY Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

International, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

At screening visit: 1. Provided signed consent to participate in the trial. 2. Adult aged ≥18 years. 3. Low calculated CV risk according to local guidelines such that pharmacological BP-lowering treatment is not mandatory: e.g. Pooled Cohorts Equation 10-years ASCVD risk \<10% in the USA. 4. Likely diagnosis of hypertension, defined as one or more of: * automated SBP at this clinic visit according to trial methods (see Appendix 2) of ≥130mmHg on no BP lowering medicines or ≥120mmHg on 1 BP lowering medicine that will be stopped at this visit, OR * documentation in last 6 months of office SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 90mmHg on no BP lowering medicines or SBP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 85mmHg on 1 BP lowering medicine that will be stopped at this visit, OR * documentation in last 6 months of home SBP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 80mmHg on no BP lowering medicines or SBP ≥ 120 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 75mmHg on 1 BP lowering medicine that will be stopped at this visit, OR * documentation in last 6 months of ambulatory daytime SBP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 80mmHg on no BP lowering medicines or SBP ≥ 120 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 75mmHg on 1 BP lowering medicine that will be stopped at this visit 5. No contraindication to trial medications, including 2-weeks placebo run-in and 4-weeks randomized treatment period with GMRx2 (dose version 1 or 2) or placebo. At randomization visit: 1. Home seated mean SBP 130-154 mmHg in the week before the randomization visit. 2. Adherence of 80-120% to placebo run-in. 3. Tolerated placebo run-in. 4. Adherence to home BP monitoring schedule: in the week before randomization, at least 6 measures (e.g. ≥2 sets of triplicate measures) including at least 1 morning and 1 evening each with ≥2 measures. Morning is defined as any measure in the am and evening as any measure in the pm. Morning and evening do not have to be same day.

Exclusion criteria

At screening visit: 1. Receiving 2 or more BP-lowering drugs. 2. Clinic seated mean SBP ≥160 mmHg and/or DBP ≥100 mmHg. 3. Pregnant or had a positive pregnancy test or unwilling to undertake a pregnancy test during the trial and up to 30 days after the discontinuation of the trial medication or breastfeeding or of childbearing age and not using an acceptable method of contraception. Acceptable methods of birth control include hormonal prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, contraceptive patch, intrauterine device, double-barrier method (e.g. condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel), or male partner sterilization. Contraception should be used for at least 1 month before the screening visit and until the end of trial participation. 4. Not suitable for participation in a clinical trial according to local ethical or regulatory requirements related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). 5. Contraindication, including hypersensitivity (e.g. anaphylaxis or angioedema), to any of the 3 trial medications. 6. Current/history of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or hypertensive encephalopathy. 7. Current/history of acute coronary syndrome, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization, or coronary artery bypass graft. 8. Current/history of New York Heart Association class III and IV congestive heart failure. 9. Current/history of a known secondary cause of hypertension, such as primary aldosteronism, renal artery stenosis, pheochromocytoma, or Cushing's syndrome. 10. Current/history of substantially uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c \> 11.0%) within last three months. 11. Current/history of end-stage renal disease or anuria or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 ml/min/1.73m2. 12. Current/history of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>3 times the upper limit of normal range within 6 months. 13. Current concomitant illness or physical impairment or mental condition that in the judgment of the investigator could interfere with the effective conduct of the trial or constitutes a significant risk to the participants' well-being. 14. Arm circumference that is too large (\>55 cm) or too small (\<20 cm) to allow accurate measurement of BP. 15. Currently taking or might need during the trial, a concomitant treatment which is known to interact significantly with the trial medication: digoxin, lithium, diabetics receiving aliskiren, moderate and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors \[e.g. ritonavir, ketoconazole, diltiazem\], simvastatin \>20 mg/day, immunosuppressants. 16. Might need treatment with drugs that are prohibited during the trial: other antihypertensive drugs, endothelin receptor antagonists, neprilysin inhibitors, or other drugs that may affect BP (see Error! Reference source not found.). 17. Current surgical or medical condition that might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of trial drugs such as prior major gastrointestinal tract surgery (e.g. gastrectomy, lap band, or bowel resection) or acute flare of inflammatory bowel disease within one year. 18. Individuals working \>2-night shifts per week. 19. Participated in any investigational drug or device trial within the previous 30 days. 20. History of alcohol or drug abuse within 12 months. At randomization visit: 1. Unable to adhere to the trial procedures during the run-in period. 2. Any of the following which in the investigator's judgment may compromise the safety of the participant if randomized to the trial medications: 1. High or low clinic BP levels even in the light of the values for home BP that are available for that participant. The exact levels of BP are not specified, since there is clinical uncertainty as to the relevance of BP levels which are high/low in clinic only; for example the clinical relevance of 'whitecoat hypertension' is uncertain. 2. High or low home DBP levels. The exact levels of DBP are not specified, reflecting clinical uncertainty of for example isolated diastolic hypertension. However, home DBP values of \>99 mmHg may typically be considered as requiring treatment intensification, and such participants would not be suitable for randomization. 3. Any abnormal laboratory value which in the judgment of the investigator could interfere with the effective conduct of the trial or constitutes a significant risk to the participants' well-being. 4. Fulfilling any of the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4Each blood pressure (BP) measurement consisted of valid SBP values (ie. SBP\>60 mmHg and \<250 mmHg). BP values were summarized using descriptive statistics, including actual values and changes from randomization to Week 4, by timepoint and treatment groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4Each blood pressure (BP) measurement consisted of valid DBP values (ie. DBP\>40mmHg and \<150mmHg). BP values were summarized using descriptive statistics, including actual values and changes from randomization to Week 4, by timepoint and treatment groups.
Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <140 and DBP <90 mmHg at Week 4At Week 4The percentage of participants achieving averaged clinic SBP \<140 and DBP \<90 mmHg at Week 4 was evaluated.
Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 4At Week 4The percentage of participants achieving averaged clinic SBP \<130 and DBP \<80 mmHg at Week 4 was evaluated. Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.
Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4Each blood pressure (BP) measurement consisted of valid DBP values (ie. DBP\>40mmHg and \<150mmHg). BP values were summarized using descriptive statistics, including actual values and changes from randomization to Week 4, by timepoint and treatment groups. To evaluate the difference in change, least squares mean change value is reported.
Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4Each blood pressure (BP) measurement consisted of valid SBP values (ie. SBP\>60 mmHg and \<250 mmHg). BP values were summarized using descriptive statistics, including actual values and changes from randomization to Week 4, by timepoint and treatment groups.
Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4Difference in change in trough home DBP for GMRx2 vs placebo was evaluated at Week 4. Trough values were measured before morning dose of the study medication. To evaluate the difference in change, least squares mean change value is reported.
Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <135 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <85 mmHg at Week 4At Week 4The percentage of participants achieving home seated mean SBP \<135 and DBP \<85 mmHg at Week 4 was evaluated
Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 4Randomization to Week 4The percentage of participants achieving averaged home seated mean SBP \<130 and DBP \<80 mmHg at Week 4 was evaluated
Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4Difference in change in trough home SBP for GMRx2 vs placebo was evaluated at Week 4. Trough values were measured before morning dose of the study medication.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Discontinued Trial Medication Due to Adverse Event (AE) or a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4The primary safety outcome is percentage of participants discontinued trial medication due to an Adverse Event (AE) or a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) from randomization to Week 4.
Percentage of Participants With Postural Hypertension at Week 4At Week 4The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with postural hypertension at Week 4
Percentage of Participants With an Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4The secondary outcome is percentage of participants with an SAE from randomization to Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Hypotension From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4The Secondary Safety Outcome is percentage of participants with symptomatic hypotension from randomization to Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Below 135 mmol/l at Week 4At Week 4The Secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum sodium concentration below 135 mmol/l at Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Above 145 mmol/l at Week 4At Week 4The Secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum sodium concentration above 145 mmol/l at Week 4
The Percentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Below 3.5 mmol/l at Week 4At Week 4The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum potassium concentration below 3.5 mmol/l at Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Above 5.5 mmol/l at Week 4At Week 4The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum potassium concentration above 5.5 mmol/l at Week 4.
Percentage of Participants With eGFR Drop of Over 30% From Randomization to Week 4Randomization to Week 4The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with eGFR drop of over 30% from randomization to Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium <135mmol/l or >145 mmol/l, and/or Serum Potassium <3.5 mmol/l or >5.5mmol/l at Week 4At Week 4The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum sodium \<135mmol/l or \>145 mmol/l, and/or serum potassium \<3.5 mmol/l or \>5.5mmol/l at Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Postural Hypotension at Week 4At Week 4The secondary safety outcome percentage of participants with postural hypotension at Week 4

Countries

Australia, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 47 trial centers spread across 5 countries (United States of America \[USA\] 23, Great Britain 10, Sri Lanka 7, Australia 5, and Nigeria 2).

Pre-assignment details

Out of 1584 participants screened, 755 participants entered the 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period. Overall, 460 of the 755 participants who entered the run-in period were not randomized, the most common reason was failure to meet the criteria of home seated mean SBP of 130-154 mmHg in the week prior to the randomization visit. Total of 295 participants were randomized to the treatment groups at the end of run-in period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)
Telmisartan 10 mg/amlodipine 1.25 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg Telmisartan 10 mg/amlodipine 1.25 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg: Oral tablets Over encapsulated Telmisartan 10 mg/amlodipine 1.25 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg oral tablet once daily in the morning after home blood pressure (BP) measurement from week 1 to week 4
113
Triple ½ (GMRx2)
Telmisartan 20 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg Telmisartan 20 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg: Oral tablets Over encapsulated Telmisartan 20 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg oral tablet once daily in the morning after home BP measurement from week 1 to week 4
119
Placebo
Placebo Placebo: Placebo One tablet daily in the morning after home BP measurement from week 1 to week 4.
63
Total295

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double-Blind PeriodAdverse Event022
Double-Blind PeriodLost to Follow-up122
Double-Blind PeriodMissing010
Double-Blind PeriodOther020
Double-Blind PeriodParticipant moved to open-label extension (OLE) study21218
Double-Blind PeriodRun in failure001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalTriple ¼ (GMRx2)Triple ½ (GMRx2)Placebo
Age, Continuous50.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.47
49.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.25
51.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.88
50.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.81
Alcohol consumption - Currently drink alcohol once a week or more113 Participants38 Participants50 Participants25 Participants
BMI30.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.22
30.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.04
30.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.69
30.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.67
Education - No formal education1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Education - Primary school20 Participants7 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Education - Secondary school85 Participants33 Participants39 Participants13 Participants
Education - Tertiary school148 Participants52 Participants57 Participants39 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
105 Participants40 Participants42 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
184 Participants70 Participants76 Participants38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Height166.55 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.223
165.97 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.439
166.68 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.247
167.36 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.878
Pre-screening 12-lead ECG - Any other abnormalities78 Participants30 Participants32 Participants16 Participants
Pre-screening 12-lead ECG - Normal217 Participants83 Participants87 Participants47 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
61 Participants26 Participants27 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
49 Participants18 Participants20 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
181 Participants66 Participants72 Participants43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
42 Participants15 Participants16 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Nigeria
10 Participants2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sri Lanka
43 Participants19 Participants18 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
43 Participants18 Participants15 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
157 Participants59 Participants65 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
165 Participants68 Participants61 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
130 Participants45 Participants58 Participants27 Participants
Smoking - Current smoker24 Participants8 Participants12 Participants4 Participants
Smoking - Ex-smoker55 Participants15 Participants28 Participants12 Participants
Smoking - Never216 Participants90 Participants79 Participants47 Participants
Vocational training41 Participants21 Participants15 Participants5 Participants
Weight85.22 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.319
85.50 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.865
85.12 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.419
84.92 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.299

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1130 / 1190 / 630 / 460
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 11332 / 11910 / 6317 / 460
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1133 / 1192 / 632 / 460

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4

Each blood pressure (BP) measurement consisted of valid SBP values (ie. SBP\>60 mmHg and \<250 mmHg). BP values were summarized using descriptive statistics, including actual values and changes from randomization to Week 4, by timepoint and treatment groups.

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4-9.6 mmHgStandard Error 1
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4-10.4 mmHgStandard Error 1.33
PlaceboDifference in Change in Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4-2.2 mmHgStandard Error 1.16
Comparison: The analysis was performed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for estimating the difference between Triple ¼ GMRx2 and placebo at Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-10.176, -4.486]MIANALYZE procedure
Comparison: The analysis was performed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for estimating the difference between Triple ½ GMRx2 and placebo at Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.305, -5.151]MIANALYZE procedure
Secondary

Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4

Each blood pressure (BP) measurement consisted of valid DBP values (ie. DBP\>40mmHg and \<150mmHg). BP values were summarized using descriptive statistics, including actual values and changes from randomization to Week 4, by timepoint and treatment groups.

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4-3.5 mmHgStandard Error 0.6
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4-4.3 mmHgStandard Error 0.93
PlaceboDifference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 40.5 mmHgStandard Error 0.91
p-value: 0.001595% CI: [-6.413, -1.597]MMRM procedure
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-7.13, -2.595]MMRM procedure
Secondary

Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4

Each blood pressure (BP) measurement consisted of valid SBP values (ie. SBP\>60 mmHg and \<250 mmHg). BP values were summarized using descriptive statistics, including actual values and changes from randomization to Week 4, by timepoint and treatment groups.

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4-6.6 mmHgStandard Error 0.94
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4-8.2 mmHgStandard Error 1.25
PlaceboDifference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 41.3 mmHgStandard Error 1.19
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.281, -4.681]MMRM procedure
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-13.588, 5.449]MMRM procedure
Secondary

Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4

Each blood pressure (BP) measurement consisted of valid DBP values (ie. DBP\>40mmHg and \<150mmHg). BP values were summarized using descriptive statistics, including actual values and changes from randomization to Week 4, by timepoint and treatment groups. To evaluate the difference in change, least squares mean change value is reported.

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4-5.1 mmHgStandard Error 0.76
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4-6.6 mmHgStandard Error 0.6
PlaceboDifference in Change in Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4-1.1 mmHgStandard Error 0.79
p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-5.978, -2.013]MMRM procedure
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-7.328, -3.694]MMRM procedure
Secondary

Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4

Difference in change in trough home DBP for GMRx2 vs placebo was evaluated at Week 4. Trough values were measured before morning dose of the study medication. To evaluate the difference in change, least squares mean change value is reported.

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4-4.2 mmHgStandard Error 0.83
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4-5.7 mmHgStandard Error 0.65
PlaceboDifference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 4-0.3 mmHgStandard Error 0.93
Comparison: The difference between Triple ¼ GMRx2 Dose and placebo at Week 4 was estimated using MMRMp-value: 0.000395% CI: [-5.865, -1.847]MMRM procedure
Comparison: The difference between Triple ½ GMRx2 Dose and placebo at Week 4 was estimated using MMRMp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-7.915, -2.932]MMRM procedure
Secondary

Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4

Difference in change in trough home SBP for GMRx2 vs placebo was evaluated at Week 4. Trough values were measured before morning dose of the study medication.

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4-8.1 mmHgStandard Error 1.24
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4-10.1 mmHgStandard Error 1.36
PlaceboDifference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 4-1.3 mmHgStandard Error 1.24
Comparison: The difference between Triple ¼ GMRx2 Dose and placebo at Week 4 was estimated using MMRMp-value: 0.000395% CI: [-10.3, -3.287]MMRM procedure
Comparison: The difference between Triple ½ GMRx2 Dose and placebo at Week 4 was estimated using MMRMp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.403, -5.082]MMRM procedure
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 4

The percentage of participants achieving averaged clinic SBP \<130 and DBP \<80 mmHg at Week 4 was evaluated. Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 423 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 436 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 42 Participants
Comparison: Percentages were calculated from the total number of participants within the randomized set.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [6.07, 26.385]Wald test
Comparison: Percentages were calculated from the total number of participants within the randomized setp-value: <0.000195% CI: [15.237, 36.646]Wald test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <140 and DBP <90 mmHg at Week 4

The percentage of participants achieving averaged clinic SBP \<140 and DBP \<90 mmHg at Week 4 was evaluated.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <140 and DBP <90 mmHg at Week 473 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <140 and DBP <90 mmHg at Week 483 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <140 and DBP <90 mmHg at Week 423 Participants
p-value: 0.000295% CI: [11.811, 42.45]Wald test
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [17.199, 47.186]Wald test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 4

The percentage of participants achieving averaged home seated mean SBP \<130 and DBP \<80 mmHg at Week 4 was evaluated

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 432 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 440 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 47 Participants
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [3.637, 28.424]Wald test
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [8.72, 33.665]Wald test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <135 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <85 mmHg at Week 4

The percentage of participants achieving home seated mean SBP \<135 and DBP \<85 mmHg at Week 4 was evaluated

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on randomized set (All participants who have been randomized). Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they have been randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <135 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <85 mmHg at Week 467 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <135 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <85 mmHg at Week 464 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <135 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <85 mmHg at Week 415 Participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [19.541, 48.549]Wald test
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [14.218, 43.093]Wald test
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Discontinued Trial Medication Due to Adverse Event (AE) or a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 4

The primary safety outcome is percentage of participants discontinued trial medication due to an Adverse Event (AE) or a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) from randomization to Week 4.

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was done on safety population. The Safety Set is defined as all participants who took at least one dose of study treatment, including during Period 1 single-blind run-in. For the analysis of the safety endpoints, participants were analyzed in the treatment group they actually received. One participant each from Triple ½ (GMRx2) and Placebo group did not receive randomly assigned treatment during Randomization to Week 4 period.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants Discontinued Trial Medication Due to Adverse Event (AE) or a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 40 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants Discontinued Trial Medication Due to Adverse Event (AE) or a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 46 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Discontinued Trial Medication Due to Adverse Event (AE) or a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 41 Participants
95% CI: [-9.83, 2.76]
95% CI: [-5.276, 9.774]
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With an Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 4

The secondary outcome is percentage of participants with an SAE from randomization to Week 4

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was done on safety population. The Safety Set is defined as all participants who took at least one dose of study treatment, including during Period 1 single-blind run-in. For the analysis of the safety endpoints, participants were analyzed in the treatment group they actually received. One participant each from Triple ½ (GMRx2) and Placebo group did not receive randomly assigned treatment during Randomization to Week 4 period.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With an Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 40 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With an Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 42 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From Randomization to Week 42 Participants
95% CI: [-12.171, 1.662]
95% CI: [-10.585, 4.049]
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With eGFR Drop of Over 30% From Randomization to Week 4

The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with eGFR drop of over 30% from randomization to Week 4

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: The analysis of binary secondary safety endpoints was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, limited to those participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With eGFR Drop of Over 30% From Randomization to Week 40 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With eGFR Drop of Over 30% From Randomization to Week 40 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With eGFR Drop of Over 30% From Randomization to Week 41 Participants
95% CI: [-9.684, 2.778]
95% CI: [-9.684, 2.59]
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Postural Hypertension at Week 4

The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with postural hypertension at Week 4

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The analysis of binary secondary safety endpoints was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, limited to those participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Postural Hypertension at Week 419 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Postural Hypertension at Week 431 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Postural Hypertension at Week 413 Participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-17.664, 8.366]GEE procedure
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-9.04, 17.981]GEE procedure
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Postural Hypotension at Week 4

The secondary safety outcome percentage of participants with postural hypotension at Week 4

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The analysis of binary secondary safety endpoints was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, limited to those participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Postural Hypotension at Week 47 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Postural Hypotension at Week 44 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Postural Hypotension at Week 43 Participants
95% CI: [-8.585, 8.916]
95% CI: [-11.077, 5.161]
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Above 5.5 mmol/l at Week 4

The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum potassium concentration above 5.5 mmol/l at Week 4.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The analysis of binary secondary safety endpoints was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, limited to those participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Above 5.5 mmol/l at Week 41 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Above 5.5 mmol/l at Week 40 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Above 5.5 mmol/l at Week 40 Participants
95% CI: [-6.324, 5.548]
95% CI: [0, 3.05]
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium <135mmol/l or >145 mmol/l, and/or Serum Potassium <3.5 mmol/l or >5.5mmol/l at Week 4

The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum sodium \<135mmol/l or \>145 mmol/l, and/or serum potassium \<3.5 mmol/l or \>5.5mmol/l at Week 4

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The analysis of binary secondary safety endpoints was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, limited to those participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium <135mmol/l or >145 mmol/l, and/or Serum Potassium <3.5 mmol/l or >5.5mmol/l at Week 412 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium <135mmol/l or >145 mmol/l, and/or Serum Potassium <3.5 mmol/l or >5.5mmol/l at Week 412 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Serum Sodium <135mmol/l or >145 mmol/l, and/or Serum Potassium <3.5 mmol/l or >5.5mmol/l at Week 44 Participants
95% CI: [-6.722, 12.959]
95% CI: [-7.158, 12.133]
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Above 145 mmol/l at Week 4

The Secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum sodium concentration above 145 mmol/l at Week 4

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The analysis of binary secondary safety endpoints was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, limited to those participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Above 145 mmol/l at Week 44 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Above 145 mmol/l at Week 45 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Above 145 mmol/l at Week 43 Participants
95% CI: [-10.928, 5.573]
95% CI: [1.38, 9.53]
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Below 135 mmol/l at Week 4

The Secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum sodium concentration below 135 mmol/l at Week 4

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The analysis of binary secondary safety endpoints was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, limited to those participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Below 135 mmol/l at Week 44 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Below 135 mmol/l at Week 41 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Serum Sodium Concentration Below 135 mmol/l at Week 40 Participants
95% CI: [-4.012, 9.35]
95% CI: [-6.364, 5.278]
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Hypotension From Randomization to Week 4

The Secondary Safety Outcome is percentage of participants with symptomatic hypotension from randomization to Week 4

Time frame: Randomization to Week 4

Population: Analysis was done on safety population. The Safety Set is defined as all participants who took at least one dose of study treatment, including during Period 1 single-blind run-in. For the analysis of the safety endpoints, participants were analyzed in the treatment group they actually received. One participant each from Triple ½ (GMRx2) and Placebo group did not receive randomly assigned treatment during Randomization to Week 4 period.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Hypotension From Randomization to Week 44 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Hypotension From Randomization to Week 46 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic Hypotension From Randomization to Week 40 Participants
95% CI: [-4.115, 9.352]
95% CI: [-2.779, 11.2]
Other Pre-specified

The Percentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Below 3.5 mmol/l at Week 4

The secondary safety outcome is percentage of participants with serum potassium concentration below 3.5 mmol/l at Week 4

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The analysis of binary secondary safety endpoints was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, limited to those participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple ¼ (GMRx2)The Percentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Below 3.5 mmol/l at Week 44 Participants
Triple ½ (GMRx2)The Percentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Below 3.5 mmol/l at Week 46 Participants
PlaceboThe Percentage of Participants With Serum Potassium Concentration Below 3.5 mmol/l at Week 41 Participants
95% CI: [-6.492, 7.954]
95% CI: [-5.171, 9.704]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026