Covid 19
Conditions
Brief summary
To evaluate whether time-to-improvement is significantly better in IMU-838 plus Oseltamivir (IONIC Intervention) and standard care vs. Oseltamivir and standard care in adult subjects with coronavirus disease (COVID-19)
Detailed description
The IONIC Protocol describes an overarching trial design to provide reliable evidence on the efficacy of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) when delivered in combination with an antiviral therapy (Oseltamivir) \[IONIC Intervention\] for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection in adult patients receiving usual standard of care. At present, there are no known treatments for COVID-19. Whilst, the anticipated scale of the epidemic is such that hospitals, and particularly intensive care facilities, may be massively overstretched. As described by a few models of pandemic spread, up to 50% of the adult population may fall sick over a period of 8-12 weeks, of whom around 10% may require hospitalisation. This figure could imply nearly 2 million hospital admissions. Considering this scenario, therapies which may only have a moderate impact on survival or on hospital resources could be worthwhile. Critically, the present trial design has been developed with consideration of the front-line hospital staff working within an overstretched care system in these unprecedented times. To minimise their burden the protocol is deliberately flexible so that it is suitable for a wide range of settings, allowing: * a broad range of patients to be enrolled (patient pathway, disease stage or mode of diagnosis) * Additional sub-studies may be added to provide more detailed information on side effects or sub-categorisation of patient types but these are not the primary objective and are not required for participation. * To be able to include more sites: the investigators will initiate the trial as a single centre (UHCW) and more sites invited to participate according to the emerging evidence * The investigator have included 'Exploratory and Secondary objectives' in the protocol however, in consideration of the circumstances the research activities will emulate investigations performed as per standard care/routines care to minimise any burden on the delivery teams. This is a Phase 2b, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study to assess the efficacy and safety of an oral dose of IMU-838 (22.5 mg twice daily \[45 mg/day\]) plus Oseltamivir (75mg twice daily \[150mg/day\]) (IONIC Intervetion) or Oseltamivir alone (75mg twice daily) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19.
Interventions
IMU-838 twice daily at 22.5mg doses for 14 days
Oseltamivir twice daily at 75mg doses for 14 days
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Open-Label Study
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 1\. Male or non-pregnant female patients at least 18 years old 2. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 infection, either: * Confirmed cases: prospective participants who test positive to a validated specific SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test or has the virus identified by electron microscopy or viral culture, as per local trust policy ≤ 7 days before randomisation. * Probable/Suspected case: prospective participants who may have been in contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19, AND have mild to severe COVID-19 clinical symptoms AND radio-graphic evidence\* of pulmonary infiltrates consistent with COVID-19 disease 3. Moderate to severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation defined as: a) Clinical status category 3-5 (inclusive) on the 7-point clinical status category scale as proposed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) master protocol: I. Category 3: hospitalized, no oxygen therapy II. Category 4: hospitalized, oxygen by mask or nasal prongs III. Category 5: hospitalized, non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen \*where routinely available, no tests will be requested for research purpose
Exclusion criteria
Therapy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate whether time-to-improvement is significantly better in IMU-838 plus Oseltamivir (IONIC Intervention) vs. Oseltamivir alone in adult subjects with COVID-19 | 14 days | Time-to-clinical improvement; defined as the time from randomisation to a 2-point improvement on the world health organizations 9-point ordinal scale (ranging from 0-8; 0 being no evidence of clinical infection and 8 being death), discharge from hospital, or death (whichever occurs first) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate safety (number of adverse events) and tolerability (laboratory abnormalities) of IMU 838 + Oseltamivir vs. Oseltamivir alone in adult subjects with COVID-19. | 28 days | Incidence of Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), including COVID-19 worsening and incidence of laboratory abnormalities (defined as a 1.5x increase in liver function test results (total protein, albumin, bilirubin, alkaline phosphotase and ALT) from screening). |
| To determine the effects of IONIC Intervention on improvement of at least two points in clinical status scale (from 0 to 8; with 8 being no evidence of clinical infection and 8 being death) | 28 days | Proportion of patients with two-point change on WHO ordinal scale at Day 7 and 28 |
| To assess the effects of IONIC Intervention vs. Oseltamivir on the need for invasive ventilation, renal replacement therapy or ECMO | 14 days | Proportion of patients free of invasive ventilation, renal replacement therapy or ECMO at Day 7 and 14 |
| To assess the effects of IONIC Intervention vs. Oseltamivir on the length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay | 28 days | To assess the effects of IONIC Intervention vs. Oseltamivir on the length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay |
| To assess the effects of IONIC Intervention vs. Oseltamivir on the time from treatment initiation to death | 28 days | Mortality at day 28 and time from treatment initiation to death |
Countries
United Kingdom