Skip to content

Eltrombopag Plus rhTPO Versus Eltrombopag for ITP During the COVID-19 Pandemic (ELABORATE-19)

The Combination of Eltrombopag and Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin (rhTPO) Versus Eltrombopag Monotherapy as Subsequent Treatment for Immune Thrombocytopenia During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04516837
Enrollment
120
Registered
2020-08-18
Start date
2020-08-31
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2020-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immune Thrombocytopenia

Keywords

corticosteroid-resistant or relapsed ITP, eltrombopag, recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO)

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study to investigate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag plus recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) versus eltrombopag as treatment for corticosteroid-resistant or relapsed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Detailed description

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the classical subsequent treatment regimen for ITP of immunosuppressants and/or steroids might increase patients' susceptibility of virus infections. To minimize ITP patients' risk during the COVID-19 global crisis and to improve treatment efficacy, this treatment regimen of eltrombopag plus recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) should be investigated. Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) is a full-length glycosylated-TPO produced by Chinese hamster ovary cells, which showed its effectiveness in ITP in a variety of studies. Eltrombopag, a small molecule agonist of thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-RA), was recommended as the subsequent treatment for ITP patients, which also already showed robust efficacy. Both eltrombopag and rhTPO demonstrated good safety in ITP patients. Since they increase the number of platelets through different mechanisms, and previous studies demonstrated that they might exert synergic effect. The investigators hypothesized that the combination of these two agents could be a promising option for ITP treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the sustained responses and safety of eltrombopag plus rhTPO as treatment for corticosteroid-resistant or relapsed ITP patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Interventions

DRUGEltrombopag

Eltrombopag 25-75 mg oral daily according to platelet response.

DRUGrhTPO

Rh-TPO 300U/kg subcutaneous injection once daily for 7 consecutive days, followed by a tapering dose in maintenance therapy.

Sponsors

Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinically confirmed corticosteroid-resistant or relapsed immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) 2. Platelet count less than 30×10\^9/L on two occasions or Platelets above 30×10\^9/L combined with bleeding manifestation (WHO bleeding scale 2 or above) 3. Subject is ≥ 18 years 4. Subject has signed and provided written informed consent. 5. Fertile patients must use effective contraception during treatment and observational period 6. Negative pregnancy test

Exclusion criteria

1. Have an impaired renal function as indicated by a serum creatinine level \> 2.0 mg/dL 2. Have an inadequate liver function as indicated by a total bilirubin level \> 2.0 mg/dL and/or an aspartate aminotransaminase or alanine aminotransferase level \> 3×upper limit of normal 3. Have a New York Heart Classification III or IV heart disease 4. Have a history of severe psychiatric disorder or are unable to comply with study and follow-up procedures 5. Have active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection 6. Have a HIV infection 7. Have active infection requiring antibiotic therapy within 7 days prior to study entry 8. Are pregnant or lactating women, or plan to become pregnant or impregnated within 12 months of receiving study drug 9. Previous splenectomy 10. Had previous or concomitant malignant disease 11. Not willing to participate in the study. 12. Expected survival of \< 2 years 13. Intolerant to murine antibodies 14. Immunosuppressive treatment within the last 2 weeks 15. Connective tissue disease 16. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia 17. Patients currently involved in another clinical trial with evaluation of drug treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete response6 monthsA complete response (CR) was defined as a sustained (≥ 3 months) platelet count ≥ 100×10\^9/L.
Response6 monthsA response (R) was defined as a sustained (≥ 3 months) platelet count ≥ 30×10\^9/L without recurrence of thrombocytopenia.
No response6 monthsNo response (NR) was defined as platelet count \< 30 × 10\^9/L or a less than two fold increase in platelet count from baseline or the presence of bleeding. Platelet count must be measured on two occasions more than a day apart.
Relapses6 monthsA relapses was defined as platelet count falls below 30×10\^9/L or bleeding accrues after achieving R or CR.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DOR (duration of response)6 monthsThe duration of achieve platelet count ≥ 30×10\^9/L and at least 2-fold increase of the baseline count and absence of bleeding since start of treatment.
Early response7 daysEarly response was defined as the attainment of a platelet count ≥ 30 × 10⁹ and at least a doubling of baseline platelet count at 1 week.
Reduction in bleeding symptoms6 monthsChanges of bleeding after treatment. Bleeding was defined in accordance with the WHO bleeding scale (0, no bleeding; 1, petechiae; 2, mild blood loss; 3, gross blood loss; and 4, debilitating blood loss).
Treatments associated adverse events6 monthsAll patients were assessed for safety every week during the first 8 weeks of treatment, and at 2-week intervals thereafter. Adverse events were scaled according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Initial response1 monthInitial treatment was defined as the attainment of a platelet count ≥ 30 × 10⁹ and at least a doubling of baseline platelet count at 1 month.
Durable response6 monthsDurable response was defined as the attainment of a platelet count ≥ 30 × 10⁹ and at least a doubling of baseline platelet count at 6 months.
TOR (time to response)6 monthsThe time to achieve platelet count ≥ 30×10\^9/L and at least 2-fold increase of the baseline count and absence of bleeding since start of treatment.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiaohui Zhang, MD
zhangxh100@sina.com+86-13522338836
Backup ContactXuelin Dou, MD
dxldw@163.com+86-15510491556

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026