Skip to content

Amplifying Sensation in Underactive Bladder

AMPLIFY: Amplifying Sensation in Underactive Bladder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04516434
Acronym
AMPLIFY
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-08-18
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2024-09-27
Last updated
2025-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder, Underactive

Keywords

electrical stimulation, urodynamics, bladder, urethra

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of intravesical (bladder) electrical stimulation and intraurethral electrical stimulation on bothersome symptoms and bladder function in neurologically-intact adult women with underactive bladder. The investigators hypothesize that electrical stimulation will decrease bothersome urinary symptoms relative to baseline and increase voided percentage during pressure-flow studies compared to their routine clinical exam.

Detailed description

1. Objective: The overall objective of this study is to improve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in adult neurologically-intact women with underactive bladder through electrical stimulation of bladder sensory nerves or urethral sensory nerves. 2. Background and Significance: The storage and elimination of urine is regulated by neural circuits in the brain and spinal cord to coordinate function between the urinary bladder and the urethra. During micturition (bladder emptying), the elimination of urine is facilitated by bladder muscle (detrusor) contraction and urethral and pelvic floor muscle relaxation. Urine flow through the urethra also activates sensory nerves to amplify bladder contractions and maintain efficient bladder emptying. Incomplete emptying and urinary retention occur when these mechanisms are disrupted or poorly coordinated. Incomplete emptying due to underactive bladder is a poorly understood health concern that symptomatically affects up to 40% of the population, with the highest prevalence of symptoms in older men and women. Despite the high prevalence of symptoms, the diagnosis of an underactive bladder remains low due to the lack of consistent terminology and standardized diagnostic criteria. This results in defining underactive bladder by a symptom complex that may involve reduced motor drive (detrusor underactivity) during bladder emptying and/or reduced sensory drive during filling and emptying. Symptoms experienced by persons with underactive bladder include nocturia, urinary frequency, urgency, incontinence, slow stream, hesitancy, straining, and sensation of incomplete emptying. The most common symptoms are nocturia, slow stream, frequency, hesitancy, and the impact of these symptoms on quality of life is substantial for many patients. The management options for persons with underactive bladder include double-void, intermittent self-catheterization, or pharmacotherapy. However, these treatments are associated with poor quality of life and patients often fail to completely resolve the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). There is a need to clarify the pathological mechanisms underlying underactive bladder to improve therapeutic outcomes. One approach to clarify reduced sensory drive is to evaluate the functional integrity of sensory nerves with quantitative sensory testing. Current perception threshold (CPT) testing delivers electrical stimulation to activate nerve fibers that evoke sensory perception, and changes in bladder sensory pathways were demonstrated in persons with diabetic detrusor underactivity. These diagnostic tests, however, have not been applied to neurologically intact adult women with underactive bladder and may provide insight into pathological sensory dysfunction. The proposed research will quantify sensory nerve sensitivity in the bladder and urethra in adult women with underactive bladder. The investigators will then amplify sensory nerve activity via continuous electrical stimulation to improve LUTS associated with underactive bladder. Achieving the proposed objectives will establish a prognostic marker for rationally guided electrical stimulation in women with underactive bladder. Understanding how these mechanisms contribute to impaired emptying in underactive bladder will enable the development of novel therapeutics to enhance quality of life. 3. Subject Recruitment: Established patients with underactive bladder will be identified by MaestroCare chart review. New patients with underactive bladder will be identified by Duke urogynecologists who see patients at one of two urogynecologic offices (Navaho Clinic in Raleigh or Patterson Place in Durham). 4. Design and Procedures: The investigators will perform a parallel interventional study with two non-randomized study arms (bladder stimulation and urethral stimulation). Potential participants will be screened remotely by email via RedCap by completing a questionnaire to determine bothersome symptoms and perceptions of bladder function. Potential participants that meet eligibility criteria will be scheduled for an in person study procedure visit, where informed consent will be signed. Participants will then undergo current perception threshold (CPT) testing, where electrical stimulation will be delivered via a catheter to the urethra (intraurethral) and bladder (intravesical) to evoke sensation. The CPT results will inform whether the participant receives an investigational session of intravesical (bladder) electrical stimulation or intraurethral electrical stimulation. Following electrical stimulation, the participant will undergo urodynamic studies (cystometrogram, pressure-flow study) to assess bladder function after the investigational stimulation procedures. The participant will also be asked to complete remotely by email a post-study symptom RedCap questionnaire 7 days after study completion.

Interventions

DEVICENeurometer Neurotron CPT

All participants will undergo CPT testing. A Neurotron catheter (12-French) with electrode will be inserted through the urethra into the bladder. The catheter balloon will be inflated and positioned at the urethrovesical junction to stimulate the urethra 10-14 mm from the bladder neck. For bladder stimulation, the catheter balloon will be deflated and the catheter will be advanced into the bladder. The device will deliver sine wave stimulus pulses at 5, 250, and 2,000 Hz. CPT will be established using an automated forced choice paradigm by the method of levels. Testing order of the bladder and urethra will be randomized between participants.

PROCEDURECystometry

After bladder stimulation or during intraurethral stimulation, cystometry will be performed to assess bladder sensation and storage. A dual-chamber 8-French catheter will be passed through the urethra into the bladder for retrograde filling. A second 8-French catheter will be placed in the vagina to measure intra-abdominal pressure. A stimulation electrode catheter will only be inserted in the intraurethral stimulation arm. EMG pads will then be placed at 3 and 9 o'clock on each side of the perineum. The bladder will then be filled with room-temperature sterile saline solution in a retrograde fashion using a pump. Bladder sensation and urgency will be assessed while filling.

PROCEDUREPressure-flow study

A pressure flow study will be performed to evaluate voiding function after stimulation. The transurethral and intra-vaginal catheters are left in place after cystometry and the participant will be asked to void around them, into a commode. Bladder and abdominal pressures will be recorded, as well as urine flow over time.

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Females ages 18 and older * Able to provide informed consent and agree to the study risks * Willing to withdraw from medications affecting urination for the 48 hours prior to the procedure (e.g., alpha-adrenergic antagonists, cholinergic agonists, cholinesterase inhibitors) * Has the below response to 2 of the 3 questions: 1. Questions regarding self-reported poor sensation during bladder filling or emptying (one or more of the below) * In the past 7 days, where did the participant feel sensations when needing to urinate? Answer: No response for Bladder Area * In the past 7 days, how often did the participant have no sensation of urine flow while urinating? Answer: Most of the time or Every time response * In the past 7 days, how often did the participant feel that the bladder was not completely empty after urination? Answer: Most of the time or Every time response 2. Questions regarding self-reported bothersome urinary symptoms (one or more of the below) * In the past 7 days, how satisfied was the participant with bladder function? Answer: Not at all satisfied or Somewhat satisfied response * In the past 7 days, how bothered was the participant by urinary symptoms? Answer: Very bothered or Extremely bothered response 3. Standard uroflowmetry with a voiding efficiency (voided volume / voided volume + residual volume) of \< 80%, voided volume + residual volume must be \>150ml for measurement

Exclusion criteria

* Preexisting neurological impairment (e.g., spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barre, cauda equina syndrome, cerebrovascular accident, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury) * Functional obstruction demonstrated by either elevated pelvic floor activity on EMG during standard pressure flow study or high tone pelvic floor on clinical exam) * Pelvic organ prolapse beyond introitus * Active urinary tract infection (candidate would be deferred until treated) * Positive pregnancy test * Less than 6 weeks postpartum * Unevaluated hematuria * Urethral stricture/stenosis * Surgical obstruction i.e., urinary retention due to obstructive sling or other anti incontinence procedure * Surgical procedures to increase bladder capacity (e.g., augmentation cystoplasty) * Active sacral neuromodulation or ongoing posterior tibial nerve stimulation sessions * Botulinum toxin injection in the past six months * History of genitourinary or gastrointestinal cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Voiding EfficiencyBaseline, pressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)Use of intraurethral electrical stimulation or intravesical electrical stimulation to assess increase in voided percentage during pressure-flow studies. Voiding efficiency is calculated as voided volume divided by the sum of voided volume and residual volume.
Change in Bothersome Symptoms and Sensationbaseline and post study procedures, up to 60 minutesLower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-29 (LURN SI-29) to assess whether electrical stimulation decreases urinary bothersome symptoms and increases bladder sensation during filling and emptying. Scores range from 0 (least severe) to 100 (most severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Current Perception ThresholdCPT, up to 60 minutesAssess bladder or urethral current perception threshold (CPT) in women with underactive bladder compared to normative values. The CPT value determined by the device is defined as the average of the minimum amplitude of the stimulus consistently detected and the stimulus 40 µA lower that was consistently not detected.
Cystometry Volumecystometry before stimulation and after stimulation (up to 60 minutes)Use of intravesical electrical stimulation to assess volumes during cystometry. Bladder sensation and urgency assessed at volume of first sensation during bladder filling, first desire to void, strong desire to void, and maximum cystometric capacity.
Bladder Contraction StrengthBaseline, pressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)Use of intraurethral electrical stimulation to assess contraction strength relative to baseline. Bladder pressure (cmH2O) is recorded over time during voiding.
Bladder Contraction DurationBaseline, pressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)Use of intraurethral electrical stimulation to assess flow duration during a bladder contraction relative to baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intravesical Electrical Stimulation
To evaluate improvement of sensations during bladder filling and emptying with electrical stimulation to the bladder or urethra. The researchers will use the values obtained from investigational sensory testing to deliver continuous electrical stimulation to the bladder . The location depends on which value is higher compared to normal. A nurse or doctor will place a catheter with electrodes to perform this investigational study procedure to the bladder (up to 60 minutes). The researchers will also place a surface patch on the participant's abdomen to disperse the electrical current and reduce discomfort.
12
Intraurethral Electrical Stimulation
To evaluate improvement of sensations during bladder filling and emptying with electrical stimulation to the bladder or urethra. The researchers will use the values obtained from investigational sensory testing to deliver continuous electrical stimulation to the urethra. The location depends on which value is higher compared to normal. A nurse or doctor will place a catheter with electrodes to perform this investigational study procedure to the urethra (up to 15 minutes). Two surface patches (electrodes) will be placed at the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions, 1 to 3 centimeters from the around the vaginal opening. These electronic sensors will record muscle activity while the bladder is contracting. The intraurethral stimulation will occur during routine urodynamic evaluation when the participant urinates on a special toilet.
8
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntravesical Electrical StimulationTotalIntraurethral Electrical Stimulation
Age, Continuous69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants19 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants17 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants20 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants20 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 120 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Bothersome Symptoms and Sensation

Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-29 (LURN SI-29) to assess whether electrical stimulation decreases urinary bothersome symptoms and increases bladder sensation during filling and emptying. Scores range from 0 (least severe) to 100 (most severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Time frame: baseline and post study procedures, up to 60 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravesical Electrical StimulationChange in Bothersome Symptoms and SensationBaseline52 CASUS questionnaire scoresStandard Deviation 15
Intravesical Electrical StimulationChange in Bothersome Symptoms and SensationPost Study Procedures46 CASUS questionnaire scoresStandard Deviation 16
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationChange in Bothersome Symptoms and SensationBaseline53 CASUS questionnaire scoresStandard Deviation 11
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationChange in Bothersome Symptoms and SensationPost Study Procedures39 CASUS questionnaire scoresStandard Deviation 18
Comparison: Change from baseline to after the pressure-flow studyp-value: 0.08Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Change from baseline to after the pressure-flow studyp-value: 0.045Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Voiding Efficiency

Use of intraurethral electrical stimulation or intravesical electrical stimulation to assess increase in voided percentage during pressure-flow studies. Voiding efficiency is calculated as voided volume divided by the sum of voided volume and residual volume.

Time frame: Baseline, pressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravesical Electrical StimulationVoiding EfficiencyBaseline32 voided percentageStandard Deviation 31
Intravesical Electrical StimulationVoiding EfficiencyPressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)43 voided percentageStandard Deviation 37
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationVoiding EfficiencyBaseline53 voided percentageStandard Deviation 22
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationVoiding EfficiencyPressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)46 voided percentageStandard Deviation 27
Comparison: Change from baseline to after the pressure-flow studyp-value: 1Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Change from baseline to after the pressure-flow studyp-value: 0.99Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Bladder Contraction Duration

Use of intraurethral electrical stimulation to assess flow duration during a bladder contraction relative to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, pressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravesical Electrical StimulationBladder Contraction DurationBaseline8 mL/sStandard Deviation 3
Intravesical Electrical StimulationBladder Contraction DurationPressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)15 mL/sStandard Deviation 12
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationBladder Contraction DurationBaseline15 mL/sStandard Deviation 3
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationBladder Contraction DurationPressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)13 mL/sStandard Deviation 7
Comparison: Change from baseline to after the pressure-flow studyp-value: 1Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Change from baseline to after the pressure-flow studyp-value: 0.99Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Bladder Contraction Strength

Use of intraurethral electrical stimulation to assess contraction strength relative to baseline. Bladder pressure (cmH2O) is recorded over time during voiding.

Time frame: Baseline, pressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravesical Electrical StimulationBladder Contraction StrengthBaseline11 cmH2OStandard Deviation 32
Intravesical Electrical StimulationBladder Contraction StrengthPressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)21 cmH2OStandard Deviation 18
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationBladder Contraction StrengthPressure-flow study (up to 60 minutes)25 cmH2OStandard Deviation 27
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationBladder Contraction StrengthBaseline33 cmH2OStandard Deviation 41
Comparison: Change from baseline to after the pressure-flow studyp-value: 1Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Change from baseline to after the pressure-flow studyp-value: 1Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Current Perception Threshold

Assess bladder or urethral current perception threshold (CPT) in women with underactive bladder compared to normative values. The CPT value determined by the device is defined as the average of the minimum amplitude of the stimulus consistently detected and the stimulus 40 µA lower that was consistently not detected.

Time frame: CPT, up to 60 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravesical Electrical StimulationCurrent Perception Threshold5 Hz8.57 mA (maximum amplitude)Standard Deviation 3.23
Intravesical Electrical StimulationCurrent Perception Threshold250 Hz9.99 mA (maximum amplitude)Standard Deviation 0
Intravesical Electrical StimulationCurrent Perception Threshold2000 Hz9.99 mA (maximum amplitude)Standard Deviation 0
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationCurrent Perception Threshold5 Hz8.27 mA (maximum amplitude)Standard Deviation 3.61
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationCurrent Perception Threshold250 Hz9.04 mA (maximum amplitude)Standard Deviation 0.4
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationCurrent Perception Threshold2000 Hz9.99 mA (maximum amplitude)Standard Deviation 0
Secondary

Cystometry Volume

Use of intravesical electrical stimulation to assess volumes during cystometry. Bladder sensation and urgency assessed at volume of first sensation during bladder filling, first desire to void, strong desire to void, and maximum cystometric capacity.

Time frame: cystometry before stimulation and after stimulation (up to 60 minutes)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravesical Electrical StimulationCystometry Volumefirst sensation of bladder filling - after stimulation281 mLStandard Deviation 146
Intravesical Electrical StimulationCystometry Volumemaximum cystometric capacity - before stimulation517 mLStandard Deviation 263
Intravesical Electrical StimulationCystometry Volumemaximum cystometric capacity - after stimulation528 mLStandard Deviation 253
Intravesical Electrical StimulationCystometry Volumefirst sensation of bladder filling - before stimulation290 mLStandard Deviation 159
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationCystometry Volumemaximum cystometric capacity - after stimulation646 mLStandard Deviation 211
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationCystometry Volumefirst sensation of bladder filling - after stimulation357 mLStandard Deviation 135
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationCystometry Volumemaximum cystometric capacity - before stimulation458 mLStandard Deviation 225
Intraurethral Electrical StimulationCystometry Volumefirst sensation of bladder filling - before stimulation253 mLStandard Deviation 122
Comparison: First sensation of bladder filling - change in cystometry before stimulation and after stimulation (up to 60 minutes).p-value: 1Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: First sensation of bladder filling - change in cystometry before stimulation and after stimulation (up to 60 minutes).p-value: 0.41Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Maximum cystometric capacity - change in cystometry before stimulation and after stimulation (up to 60 minutes).p-value: 1Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Maximum cystometric capacity - change in cystometry before stimulation and after stimulation (up to 60 minutes).p-value: 0.01Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026