Skip to content

Bone Regenerative Techniques in Endodontic Microsurgery

Healing After Endodontic Microsurgery Using Resorbable Collagen Based Bone Augmentation Material: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04514991
Enrollment
67
Registered
2020-08-17
Start date
2019-09-03
Completion date
2022-03-30
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apical Periodontitis

Keywords

Persistent periapical pathology

Brief summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate two dimensionally and 3-dimensionally the effect of resorbable collagen-based bone filling material on periapical healing following endodontic microsurgery (EMS) on endodontic lesions presenting four-wall defect.

Interventions

DEVICEFoundation

Collagen-based, bone filling augmentation material used to stimulate bone formation in extraction sockets or bone defects in the alveolar ridge.

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy adult. * Intact coronal restoration with no sign of leakage. * Class B (small lesion) and C (large lesion) periapical lesions. (Kim and Kratchman 2006)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with medical conditions and contraindications to surgery. * Minors. * Pregnancy. * Teeth with signs of coronal leakage. * Teeth with vertical root fractures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)12 monthsPeriapical healing was assessed by qualitatively evaluating bone regeneration through PA radiographs using well-established criteria. Molven's criteria categorize healing using periapical films into four categories: complete healing, incomplete healing, uncertain and unsatisfactory healing.
3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)12 monthsPeriapical healing was assessed by qualitatively evaluating bone regeneration through CBCT scans using Penn 3D criteria. Cases were classified into complete, limited, or unsatisfactory healing.
2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)12 monthsPeriapical healing was assessed by qualitatively evaluating bone regeneration through PA radiographs using well-established criteria. Molven's criteria categorize healing using periapical films into four categories: complete healing, incomplete healing, uncertain and unsatisfactory healing.
3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)12 monthsPeriapical healing was assessed by qualitatively evaluating bone regeneration through CBCT scans using Penn 3D criteria. Cases were classified into complete, limited, or unsatisfactory healing

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
C Score (Overall Cases)12 monthsCortical plate healing using RAC/B index as evaluated on CBCT scans. Score 0: Cortical plate not re-established (Nonhealed). Score 1: Cortical plate is partially re-established (Partially healed). Score 2: Cortical plate is re-established (Completely healed).
C Score (Asymptomatic Cases Only)12 monthsCortical plate healing using RAC/B index as evaluated on CBCT scans. Score 0: Cortical plate not re-established (Nonhealed). Score 1: Cortical plate is partially re-established (Partially healed). Score 2: Cortical plate is re-established (Completely healed).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Start date of recruitment: 09/03/2019 End date of recruitment: 12/15/2020 Patients were consecutively enrolled until March 10th, 2020, after which all clinical and research activity was suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was resumed in August 11th, 2020.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Endodontic Microsurgery Only
Surgical sites assigned to this group received Endodontic microsurgery procedure.
41
Endodontic Microsurgery Only
Surgical sites assigned to this group received Endodontic microsurgery procedure.
41
Foundation+ Endodontic Microsurgery
Surgical sites assigned to this group received Endodontic microsurgery procedure+ Foundation (J. Morita USA). Foundation: Collagen-based, bone filling augmentation material used to stimulate bone formation in extraction sockets or bone defects in the alveolar ridge.
45
Foundation+ Endodontic Microsurgery
Surgical sites assigned to this group received Endodontic microsurgery procedure+ Foundation (J. Morita USA). Foundation: Collagen-based, bone filling augmentation material used to stimulate bone formation in extraction sockets or bone defects in the alveolar ridge.
45
Total172

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFoundation+ Endodontic MicrosurgeryEndodontic Microsurgery OnlyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Lesions0 Lesions0 Lesions
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Lesions8 Lesions13 Lesions
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
40 Lesions33 Lesions73 Lesions
Arch
Mandible
16 Lesions15 Lesions31 Lesions
Arch
Maxilla
29 Lesions26 Lesions55 Lesions
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Lesions31 Lesions59 Lesions
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Lesions10 Lesions27 Lesions
Tooth Type
Anterior
19 Lesions16 Lesions35 Lesions
Tooth Type
Posterior
26 Lesions25 Lesions51 Lesions

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)

Periapical healing was assessed by qualitatively evaluating bone regeneration through PA radiographs using well-established criteria. Molven's criteria categorize healing using periapical films into four categories: complete healing, incomplete healing, uncertain and unsatisfactory healing.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Analysis per osteotomy. Excluded participants presenting with symptoms.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Control2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Complete23 osteotomy site
Control2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Incomplete1 osteotomy site
Control2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Uncertain1 osteotomy site
Control2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Unsatisfactory1 osteotomy site
Treatment2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Unsatisfactory1 osteotomy site
Treatment2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Complete28 osteotomy site
Treatment2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Uncertain2 osteotomy site
Treatment2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Incomplete1 osteotomy site
Primary

2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)

Periapical healing was assessed by qualitatively evaluating bone regeneration through PA radiographs using well-established criteria. Molven's criteria categorize healing using periapical films into four categories: complete healing, incomplete healing, uncertain and unsatisfactory healing.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Analysis completed per osteotomy site.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Control2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Complete healing24 osteotomy site
Control2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Incomplete healing1 osteotomy site
Control2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Uncertain healing3 osteotomy site
Control2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Unsatisfactory healing2 osteotomy site
Treatment2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Unsatisfactory healing3 osteotomy site
Treatment2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Complete healing29 osteotomy site
Treatment2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Uncertain healing3 osteotomy site
Treatment2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Incomplete healing1 osteotomy site
Primary

3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)

Periapical healing was assessed by qualitatively evaluating bone regeneration through CBCT scans using Penn 3D criteria. Cases were classified into complete, limited, or unsatisfactory healing

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Analysis per osteotomy site. Excluded participants with symptoms.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Control3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Complete10 osteotomy sites
Control3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Limited14 osteotomy sites
Control3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Unsatisfactory2 osteotomy sites
Treatment3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Complete21 osteotomy sites
Treatment3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Limited10 osteotomy sites
Treatment3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Asymptomatic Cases Only)Unsatisfactory1 osteotomy sites
Primary

3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)

Periapical healing was assessed by qualitatively evaluating bone regeneration through CBCT scans using Penn 3D criteria. Cases were classified into complete, limited, or unsatisfactory healing.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Analysis completed per osteotomy site.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Control3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Complete11 osteotomy sites
Control3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Limited14 osteotomy sites
Control3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Unsatisfactory5 osteotomy sites
Treatment3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Complete22 osteotomy sites
Treatment3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Limited10 osteotomy sites
Treatment3D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases)Unsatisfactory4 osteotomy sites
Secondary

C Score (Asymptomatic Cases Only)

Cortical plate healing using RAC/B index as evaluated on CBCT scans. Score 0: Cortical plate not re-established (Nonhealed). Score 1: Cortical plate is partially re-established (Partially healed). Score 2: Cortical plate is re-established (Completely healed).

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Analysis per osteotomy site. Excluded participants with symptoms.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
ControlC Score (Asymptomatic Cases Only)C-score 212 osteotomy sites
ControlC Score (Asymptomatic Cases Only)C-score 112 osteotomy sites
ControlC Score (Asymptomatic Cases Only)C-score 02 osteotomy sites
TreatmentC Score (Asymptomatic Cases Only)C-score 222 osteotomy sites
TreatmentC Score (Asymptomatic Cases Only)C-score 19 osteotomy sites
TreatmentC Score (Asymptomatic Cases Only)C-score 01 osteotomy sites
Secondary

C Score (Overall Cases)

Cortical plate healing using RAC/B index as evaluated on CBCT scans. Score 0: Cortical plate not re-established (Nonhealed). Score 1: Cortical plate is partially re-established (Partially healed). Score 2: Cortical plate is re-established (Completely healed).

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Analysis per osteotomy site.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
ControlC Score (Overall Cases)C-Score 213 osteotomy sites
ControlC Score (Overall Cases)C-score 112 osteotomy sites
ControlC Score (Overall Cases)C-score 05 osteotomy sites
TreatmentC Score (Overall Cases)C-score 04 osteotomy sites
TreatmentC Score (Overall Cases)C-Score 223 osteotomy sites
TreatmentC Score (Overall Cases)C-score 19 osteotomy sites

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026