Skip to content

Silver Diamine Fluoride Effectiveness Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in Arresting ECC

Effectiveness of Silver Diamine Fluoride in Arresting Early Childhood Caries: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04514094
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-08-14
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2019-08-23
Last updated
2020-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early Childhood Caries

Brief summary

The study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the biannual application of 38% silver diamine fluoride in arresting early childhood caries when compared to atraumatic restorative treatment.

Detailed description

Owing to the virulent nature of early childhood caries (ECC) and its consequences if left untreated, immediate intervention is indicated to control the condition. Barriers to intervention as young age, uncooperative patient behavior and lack of access to dental care are however, very common. The use of silver diamine fluoride as an anticaries agent is of growing popularity worldwide due to its promising results, safety of use, ease of application and relatively low cost. Further research is still required in order to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of SDF in arresting early childhood caries. Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of biannual application of 38% silver diamine fluoride in arresting early childhood caries when compared to atraumatic restorative treatment.

Interventions

DRUGSDF

SDF promotes enamel and dentin remineralization, as well as inhibit the growth of cariogenic bacteria. the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved SDF as a device for reducing tooth sensitivity in the USA.

PROCEDUREART

The ART technique involves caries excavation by hand instruments only with care to avoid pulp exposure. Such excavation is mainly from the periphery of the lesion to achieve a good seal of the restoration and minimize leakage. The tooth is then restored by glass ionomer cement.

Sponsors

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* For children: 1. Healthy children. 2. Age range 2-5 years. 3. Informed consent (Appendix I) For teeth: * Teeth with active dentin lesions corresponding to ICDAS II score 5 and 6. * Teeth having lesions that are considered active according to ICDAS II activity criteria for coronal primary caries.

Exclusion criteria

* For children: 1. Children with systemic diseases. 2. Children with reported allergy to silver or to any other component in the materials used. 3. Children unable to return for recall visits. For teeth: * Clinical or radiographic signs of pulpal involvement.(pain, abscess, sinus, obvious discoloration, premature hypermobility, internal or external root resorption). * Teeth with inactive lesions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in clinical success/failure rateat 6 and 12 monthsTreated teeth in both groups will be evaluated for clinical success in each follow up appointment. The number of clinically successful/failed teeth will be recorded in

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of the intervention visitDuring the proceduretime spent during each intervention appointment was calculated in seconds
Patient Satisfactionafter the 4th weekusing a 4-item, 5-level, Likert-scale questionnaire o assess feelings about the application procedure.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026