Skip to content

Healing After Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting in the Palatal Area With and Without Suture

Healing After Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting in the Palatal Area With and Without Suture: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04513886
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-08-14
Start date
2018-11-19
Completion date
2019-08-26
Last updated
2020-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wound Healing

Keywords

wound healing, palate, connective tissue harvesting, single incision

Brief summary

This study evaluated the outcomes in the early healing of palatal wounds after harvesting a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) using the single incision technique with placement of a collagen haemostatic sponge (CHS) without suturing the palate. The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the early wound healing index (EHI).

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes in the early wound healing after harvesting a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) using the single incision technique and collagen haemostatic sponge (CHS) placement, with and without suturing the palate. 36 subjects were randomized to receive (n=18, Suture group-SG) or not a suture (n=18, no Suture group-nSG). Outcomes variables were: Early healing index (EHI) at 7, 14 and 30 days, self-reported pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 7 and 14 days, immediate (iB) and delayed bleeding (dB). Data obtained were compared by Fisher's exact test, T test for independent sample, Mann-Whitney test (U test) and Wilcoxon sign test as appropriate. The level of significance was set at p \< 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with Infostat version 2015.

Interventions

PROCEDURESubepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) using the single incision technique, with and without suturing the palate

A SCTG was harvested using the single incision technique described by Hürzeler & Weng. The palatal incisions were standardized to extend between the area between mesial of the canine and mesial of the first molar.In the Suture Group sites a cross- mattress suture and interrupted single sutures were performed using nylon 5-0 when appropriate. In the no Suture Group sites, no suture was performed. In both groups, a CHS was placed after removing the graft to achieve the haemostasis of the palate and subsequent compressed with gauze soaked in saline for 5 minutes.

Sponsors

Maimonides University
CollaboratorOTHER
Mariel Viviana Gómez
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants were assigned to one of two groups in parallel for the duration of the study: This study was a non-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial, with a parallel design, comparing early healing of palatal wounds after harvesting subepithelial connective tissue graft using the single incision technique, with and without palatal sutures.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with an indication of mucogingival surgery for single gingival recession treatment that required harvesting a subepithelial connective tissue graft * Age \>18 years ≤ 60 years. * Periodontally and systemically healthy. * Palatal fibromucosa width ≥ 2mm evaluated with a North Carolina probe placed perpendicular to the hard palate, prior to surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Smoking. * Contraindications for periodontal surgery. * Subjects presenting coagulation disorders (history of Haemophilia, von Willebrand disease or anticoagulant therapy). * Subjects taking medications known to interfere with periodontal tissue health or healing. * Subjects that had been operated on the palate (connective tissue removed) previously from that same donor area.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early healing indexDay 7 post surgery1\. Complete flap closure without fibrin line at the palate; 2. Complete flap closure with fibrin line at the palate; 3. Complete flap closure with small fibrin clot(s) at the palate; 4. Incomplete flap closure with partial necrosis of the palatal tissue; 5. Incomplete flap closure with complete necrosis of the palatal tissue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with immediate bleedingimmediately postsurgeryAn embedded gauze with saline was pressed on the palate wound for 5 minutes in both groups. Positive iB was recorded if once the gauze was removed, bleeding persisted. Compression was repeated as many times as necessary until bleeding was arrested. If this maneuver was not enough, additional actions should be performed to stop bleeding and the patient would be excluded from the study.
Number of participants with delayed bleeding7 days post surgeryAny type of bleeding from the palatal area reported during the postoperative period was recorded as positive
Pain level / discomfortfirst week after surgery,Pain level / discomfort experienced at the surgical site of the palate, was self-reported by the subject and registered with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). It was required to the subject to graduate their sensitivity using a scale of 10 cm marked in mm between 0 and 100, labelled numerically from 0 to 10. Zero corresponds to no discomfort and 10 unbearable pain. All other possible adverse effects were also recorded.

Countries

Argentina

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026