Skip to content

Rate Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

The Surrogate Marker of Rate Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04513509
Acronym
RaP-AF
Enrollment
13
Registered
2020-08-14
Start date
2020-10-21
Completion date
2022-07-01
Last updated
2026-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test, Rate Control

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, rate control, cardiopulmonary exercise test

Brief summary

To search for the best marker for the patients in atrial fibrillation with rate control

Detailed description

In an aging society, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation is increasing. The main treatment strategy is to reduce the complications of embolic stroke and heart failure. Among these patients, a group of them will choose to have "rate control" based on the heart conditions and the preference of the patients. The strategy is to control the ventricular rate by drugs to prevent the heart from failure. However, when the physicians attempt to do so, they encounter two questions: how much is the optimal drug dose? And what is the best marker we are looking to? To answer these questions, the investigators design a prospective, cross-over study to explore this issue. The participants will do cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) before and after treatment. They will receive another CPET if drug dose is titrated up. With the study, the investigators will understand whether a resting heart rate can be a good marker for optimal drug dosage, and what is the optimal range of heart rate the physicians should target.

Interventions

DRUGAtenolol, Bisoprolol, Metoprolol, Nebivolol, Propranolol, Diltiazem, Verapamil, digoxin

Start with empirical lower dose for 3 months, and then titrate up

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18\~90 years old 2. Rate control is preferred after shared decision making

Exclusion criteria

1. cannot cooperate with or complete CPET 2. has contraindication for CPET, such as uncontrolled heart failure, hypertension, angina, valvular heart disease, lung function impariment that SaO2\<90% at room air. 3. Ventricular rate below 80/min before any medication 4. Permanent pacemaker implanted

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Maximal Oxygen consumption0, 3, 6 monthsacquire the data by Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with different (low and high) drug dosages for rate control

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChih-Chieh Yu, MD.PhD

National Taiwan University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026