Skip to content

A Study of SEL-212 in Patients With Gout Refractory to Conventional Therapy

A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of SEL-212 in Patients With Gout Refractory to Conventional Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04513366
Acronym
DISSOLVE I
Enrollment
112
Registered
2020-08-14
Start date
2020-08-18
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2025-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Gout

Brief summary

This is one of two replicate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel arm trials to determine the safety and efficacy of two different dose levels of SEL-212 compared to placebo. 112 and 153 patients, stratified as to the presence or absence of tophi, were randomized in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio prior to Baseline to receive treatment with one of two dose levels of SEL-212 or placebo every 28 days for approximately 6 months in each trial respectively (SEL-212/301 and SEL-212/302). Analysis of primary and key efficacy was performed at Day 28 of Treatment Period 6. Safety was monitored throughout the study.

Detailed description

This is one of two replicate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel arm trials to determine the safety and efficacy of two different dose levels of SEL-212 compared to placebo. 112 and 153 patients, stratified as to the presence or absence of tophi, were randomized in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio prior to Baseline to receive treatment with one of two dose levels of SEL-212 or placebo every 28 days for approximately 6 months in each trial respectively (SEL-212/301 and SEL-212/302). The SEL-212 doses differed as to the SEL-110.36 component. Participants received SEL-037 administered at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg via intravenous (IV) infusion immediately after receiving SEL-110.36 at a dose of either 0.1 mg/kg (SEL-212 low-dose) or 0.15 mg/kg (SEL-212 high-dose) via IV infusion. The placebo consisted of normal saline. Upon completion of the 6-month double-blinded, placebo-controlled portion of the study, SEL-212/301 continued in a blinded, placebo-controlled 6-month extension. This provided up to 12 months of continuous treatment with SEL-212 in a placebo controlled fashion. Efficacy assessments were conducted at intervals that are appropriate to determine treatment effect with samples for the primary endpoint drawn during Treatment Period 6. Safety was monitored throughout the study with an independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB).

Interventions

IV infusion of SEL-212 low-dose every 28 days for a total of up to 12 infusions

IV infusion of SEL-212 high-dose every 28 days for a total of up to 12 infusions

OTHERNormal Saline

IV infusion of Normal Saline every 28 days for a total of up to 12 infusions

Sponsors

Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Has negative results of an FDA Emergency Use Authorized COVID-19 molecular assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from a nasal or oropharyngeal specimen; 2. History of symptomatic gout defined as: 1. ≥ 3 gout flares within 18 months of Screening or 2. Presence of ≥ 1 gout tophus or 3. Current diagnosis of gouty arthritis 3. At the Screening Visit: male age 21 - 80 years, inclusive, or female of non-childbearing potential age 21-80 years, inclusive, where nonchildbearing potential is defined as: a. \> 6 weeks after hysterectomy with or without surgical bilateral salpingooperhectony or b. Post-menopausal (\> 24 months of natural amenorrhea or in the absence of \>24 months of amenorrhea, one documented confirmatory FSH measurement) 4. Has chronic refractory gout defined as having failed to normalize sUA and whose signs and symptoms are inadequately controlled with any of the xanthine oxidase inhibitors, or for whom these drugs are contraindicated for the patient; 5. Has at the Screening Visit SUA ≥ 7 mg/dL 6. Negative serology for HIV-1/-2 and negative antigen to hepatitis B and negative antibodies to hepatitis C;

Exclusion criteria

1. Has a history of anaphylaxis, severe allergic reactions, or severe atopy; 2. Has a history of any allergy to pegylated products, including, but not limited to pegloticase (Krystexxa®), peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys®), peginterferon alfa-2b (PegIntron®), pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®), pegaptanib (Macugen®), pegaspargase (Oncaspar®), pegademase (Adagen®), peg-epoetin beta (Mircera®), pegvisomant (Somavert®) certolizumab pegol (Cimzia®), naloxegol (Movantik®), peginesatide (Omontys®), and doxorubicin liposome (Doxil®); 3. Is taking and cannot discontinue known major CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitors or major CYP3A4/P-gp inducers at least 14 days before dosing. Patients must remain off these medications for the duration of the study, including natural products such as St. John's Wort or grapefruit juice. 4. Is taking drugs known to interact with rapamycin (sirolimus - Rapamune®) such as cyclosporine, diltiazem, erythromycin, ketoconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, rifampin, verapamil unless they are stopped 14 days prior to dosing and will not be used/prescribed during the trial. 5. Had major surgery within 3 months of initial screening. 6. Had a gout flare during Screening that was resolved for less than 1 week prior to first treatment with study drug (exclusive of chronic synovitis/arthritis) unless the patient has a history of inter-flare intervals of \< 1 week. 7. Has uncontrolled diabetes at Screening with HbA1c ≥ 8.5%; 8. Has fasting Screening glucose \> 240 mg/dL; 9. Has fasting Screening triglyceride \> 500 mg/dL; 10. Has fasting Screening low-density lipoprotein (LDL) \> 200 mg/dL; 11. Has glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency; 12. Has uncontrolled hypertension defined as blood pressure \> 170/100 mmHg at Screening and 1 week prior to dosing 13. Individual laboratory values which are exclusionary * White blood cell count (WBC) \< 3.0 x109/L * Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine amino transferase (ALT) \> 3x upper limit of normal (ULN) in the absence of known active liver disease * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 * Urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) \> 30 mg/g * Hemoglobin (Hgb) \< 9 g/dL * Serum phosphate \< 2.0 mg/dL 14. Is receiving ongoing treatment for arrhythmia, including placement of an implantable defibrillator, unless considered stable and on active treatment; 15. Has evidence of unstable cardiovascular disease or unstable cerebrovascular vascular disease. This includes patients who have had a cardiac/vascular event(s) in the last 3 months including heart attack, stroke or vascular bypass surgery or patients who are deemed, by their physician or PI, to have active cardiovascular, cerebrovascular or peripheral vascular symptoms/disease inadequately controlled by medication; 16. Has congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association Class III or IV; 17. Unless clinically stable and/or appropriately treated, electrocardiogram (ECG) with evidence of clinically significant arrhythmia or other abnormalities that, in the opinion of the investigator, are consistent with significant underlying cardiac disease; 18. History of significant hematological disorders within 5 years or autoimmune disorders, and/or patient is currently immunosuppressed or immunocompromised; 19. Prior exposure to any experimental or marketed uricase (e.g., rasburicase (Elitek, Fasturtec), pegloticase (Krystexxa®), pegadricase (SEL 37)) 20. Patient has received a live vaccine in the previous 6 months. 21. Patient is planning to receive any live vaccine during the study. 22. History of malignancy within the last 5 years other than basal skin cancer; 23. Patients with a documented history of moderate or severe alcohol or substance use disorder within the 12 months prior to randomization. 24. History of or evidence of clinically severe interstitial lung disease 25. Immunocompromised state, regardless of etiology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction in Serum Uric Acid (sUA) < 6 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) for At Least 80% of The Time During Treatment Period 6 (Month 6)Month 6

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in Mean sUABaseline, Up to 6 months
Change From Baseline in the Physical Component Summary Score of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline, Up to 6 monthsThe SF-36 is a 36-item scale constructed to survey health status and quality of life (QoL). The SF-36 assesses 8 health concepts, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section: limitations in physical activities because of health problems; limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; bodily pain; general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; vitality (energy and fatigue); and general health perceptions. Each scale was directly transformed into a 0-100 scale, and the total average scores were calculated across the 8 health concepts. The 8 domains contributed to physical component summary and mental component summary scores. Total scores for the physical component summary score ranged from 0-100, with a higher score indicating better health outcomes.
Proportion of Participants With at Least Partial Response (PR) (as Best Response) in Overall Tophus Response Evaluation in Participants With Tophi at BaselineBaseline up to 6 monthsBaseline photographs of the hands and feet of each participant were obtained using a standardized method in all participants together with photographs of up to 2 other representative sites of tophaceous disease. The baseline photographs were assessed by three independent reviewers to prospectively identify sites of tophaceous disease present at the start of treatment. Up to 5 tophi in the photographs were chosen by the reviewers for measurement over the course of therapy. The reviewers assessed the photographs for size of each target tophus using image analysis software. At least PR was defined as at least a 50% decrease in the area of at least one tophus, and includes participants with complete response (CR). Data are presented for the proportion of participants with at least PR (as best response).
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction of sUA < 6 mg/dL for at Least 80% of the Time During Month 6 in the Subset of Participants With Tophi at BaselineBaseline up to 6 monthsThe number of responders in the subgroup of Intent-to-Treat participants with tophi at baseline divided by the number of Intent-to-Treat participants with tophi at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Mean sUABaseline, Up to 6 months
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Total Score of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Baseline, Up to 6 monthsThe HAQ-DI assesses fine movements of the upper extremity, locomotor activities of the lower extremity, and activities that involve both the upper and lower extremities. It includes 20 items in 8 categories: activity, arising, dressing and grooming, eating, grip, hygiene, reach and walking. Scoring within each section was on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), with higher score showing more disability. The average of the 8 category scores was reported as the HAQ-DI total score on a scale of 0 to 3. A decrease in HAQ-DI score from baseline indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Incidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-6 (Months 1-6)Months 1-6Gout flare was assessed as part of adverse event (AE) collection. Gout flares were assessed during the Treatment Phase using a validated definition of flares in participants with established gout. A gout flare (per Gaffo et al. 2018) was defined as the fulfillment of at least 3 of the following 4 criteria: 1. Participant-defined gout flare, 2. Pain at rest score of \>3 on a 0-10-point numerical rating scale, 3. Presence of at least 1 swollen joint, 4. Presence of at least 1 warm joint. Data are presented for the LS mean incidence per month of gout flares during Treatment Periods 1-6 (Months 1-6). A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.
Incidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-3 (Months 1-3)Months 1-3Gout flare was assessed as part of adverse event (AE) collection. Gout flares were assessed during the Treatment Phase using a validated definition of flares in participants with established gout. A gout flare (per Gaffo et al. 2018) was defined as the fulfillment of at least 3 of the following 4 criteria: 1. Participant-defined gout flare, 2. Pain at rest score of \>3 on a 0-10-point numerical rating scale, 3. Presence of at least 1 swollen joint, 4. Presence of at least 1 warm joint. Data are presented for the LS mean incidence per month of gout flares during Treatment Periods 1-3 (Months 1-3). A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Number of Tender JointsBaseline, Up to 6 monthsTender and/or swollen joints were counted. The following joints were assessed: metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints of the hands; the metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the feet; shoulder, elbow, wrist, knee, ankle, tarsus, sternoclavicular, and acromioclavicular joints.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SEL-212A (Low-dose)
SEL-212 is comprised of 2 components: SEL-037 and SEL-110. Participants received SEL-037 administered at a dose of 0.2 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) via intravenous (IV) infusion immediately after receiving SEL-110 at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg (SEL-212A) every 28 days for approximately six months during the double-blind treatment phase. After completion of the double-blind treatment phase, participants continued into the double-blind extension phase. In this phase, participants continued in the identical study treatment group (SEL-212A \[low-dose\]) for six additional doses, every 28 days, lasting up to approximately an additional six months.
37
SEL-212B (High-dose)
SEL-212 is comprised of 2 components: SEL-037 and SEL-110. Participants received SEL-037 administered at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg via IV infusion immediately after receiving SEL-110 at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg (SEL-212B) every 28 days for approximately six months during the double-blind treatment phase. After completion of the double-blind treatment phase, participants continued into the double-blind extension phase. In this phase, participants continued in the identical study treatment group (SEL-212A \[high-dose\]) for six additional doses, every 28 days, lasting up to approximately an additional six months.
38
Placebo
Participants received placebo (normal saline) via IV infusion every 28 days for approximately six months during the double-blind treatment phase. After completion of the double-blind treatment phase, participants continued into the double-blind extension phase. In this phase, participants continued in the identical study treatment group (placebo) for six additional doses, every 28 days, lasting up to approximately an additional six months.
37
Total112

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Extension PhaseAdverse Event001
Extension PhaseDeath010
Extension PhaseLost to Follow-up111
Extension PhaseOther than Specified401
Extension PhaseSponsor Decision010
Extension PhaseWithdrawal by Subject311
Treatment PhaseAdverse Event011
Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up125
Treatment PhaseOther than Specified102
Treatment PhasePhysician Decision200
Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject683

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSEL-212A (Low-dose)SEL-212B (High-dose)PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.55
53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.99
53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.57
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants6 Participants10 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants32 Participants27 Participants82 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants9 Participants7 Participants22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants27 Participants22 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants35 Participants37 Participants107 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 371 / 380 / 37
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 3729 / 3827 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 375 / 382 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction in Serum Uric Acid (sUA) < 6 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) for At Least 80% of The Time During Treatment Period 6 (Month 6)

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants, including participants with missing data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Proportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction in Serum Uric Acid (sUA) < 6 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) for At Least 80% of The Time During Treatment Period 6 (Month 6)0.48 proportion of participants
SEL-212B (High-dose)Proportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction in Serum Uric Acid (sUA) < 6 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) for At Least 80% of The Time During Treatment Period 6 (Month 6)0.56 proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction in Serum Uric Acid (sUA) < 6 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) for At Least 80% of The Time During Treatment Period 6 (Month 6)0.04 proportion of participants
p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [0.23, 0.64]Mantel Haenszel
p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [0.32, 0.73]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean sUA

Time frame: Baseline, Up to 6 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants including participants with missing data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Change From Baseline in Mean sUA-5.1 mg/dLStandard Error 0.6
SEL-212B (High-dose)Change From Baseline in Mean sUA-5.5 mg/dLStandard Error 0.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean sUA0.2 mg/dLStandard Error 0.6
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [-7.18, -3.42]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [-7.57, -3.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Physical Component Summary Score of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

The SF-36 is a 36-item scale constructed to survey health status and quality of life (QoL). The SF-36 assesses 8 health concepts, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section: limitations in physical activities because of health problems; limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; bodily pain; general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; vitality (energy and fatigue); and general health perceptions. Each scale was directly transformed into a 0-100 scale, and the total average scores were calculated across the 8 health concepts. The 8 domains contributed to physical component summary and mental component summary scores. Total scores for the physical component summary score ranged from 0-100, with a higher score indicating better health outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, Up to 6 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants including participants with missing data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Change From Baseline in the Physical Component Summary Score of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)7.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
SEL-212B (High-dose)Change From Baseline in the Physical Component Summary Score of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)4.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Physical Component Summary Score of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)3.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
p-value: 0.09Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.472Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Number of Tender Joints

Tender and/or swollen joints were counted. The following joints were assessed: metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints of the hands; the metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the feet; shoulder, elbow, wrist, knee, ankle, tarsus, sternoclavicular, and acromioclavicular joints.

Time frame: Baseline, Up to 6 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants including participants with missing data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Number of Tender Joints-2.1 tender jointsStandard Error 0.3
SEL-212B (High-dose)Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Number of Tender Joints-1.4 tender jointsStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Number of Tender Joints-1.9 tender jointsStandard Error 0.3
p-value: 0.51797.5% CI: [-1.1, 0.61]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.2397.5% CI: [-0.39, 1.28]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Total Score of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

The HAQ-DI assesses fine movements of the upper extremity, locomotor activities of the lower extremity, and activities that involve both the upper and lower extremities. It includes 20 items in 8 categories: activity, arising, dressing and grooming, eating, grip, hygiene, reach and walking. Scoring within each section was on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), with higher score showing more disability. The average of the 8 category scores was reported as the HAQ-DI total score on a scale of 0 to 3. A decrease in HAQ-DI score from baseline indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Up to 6 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants including participants with missing data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Total Score of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
SEL-212B (High-dose)Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Total Score of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 6 in the Total Score of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
p-value: 0.2597.5% CI: [-0.35, 0.12]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.50697.5% CI: [-0.16, 0.29]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Incidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-3 (Months 1-3)

Gout flare was assessed as part of adverse event (AE) collection. Gout flares were assessed during the Treatment Phase using a validated definition of flares in participants with established gout. A gout flare (per Gaffo et al. 2018) was defined as the fulfillment of at least 3 of the following 4 criteria: 1. Participant-defined gout flare, 2. Pain at rest score of \>3 on a 0-10-point numerical rating scale, 3. Presence of at least 1 swollen joint, 4. Presence of at least 1 warm joint. Data are presented for the LS mean incidence per month of gout flares during Treatment Periods 1-3 (Months 1-3). A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.

Time frame: Months 1-3

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants including participants with missing data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Incidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-3 (Months 1-3)0.4 gout flares/monthStandard Error 0.1
SEL-212B (High-dose)Incidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-3 (Months 1-3)0.4 gout flares/monthStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboIncidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-3 (Months 1-3)0.3 gout flares/monthStandard Error 0.1
Comparison: Treatment Periods 1-3 (Months 1-3)p-value: 0.73197.5% CI: [-0.4, 0.54]ANOVA
Comparison: Treatment Periods 1-3 (Month 1-3)p-value: 0.58397.5% CI: [-0.35, 0.58]ANOVA
Secondary

Incidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-6 (Months 1-6)

Gout flare was assessed as part of adverse event (AE) collection. Gout flares were assessed during the Treatment Phase using a validated definition of flares in participants with established gout. A gout flare (per Gaffo et al. 2018) was defined as the fulfillment of at least 3 of the following 4 criteria: 1. Participant-defined gout flare, 2. Pain at rest score of \>3 on a 0-10-point numerical rating scale, 3. Presence of at least 1 swollen joint, 4. Presence of at least 1 warm joint. Data are presented for the LS mean incidence per month of gout flares during Treatment Periods 1-6 (Months 1-6). A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.

Time frame: Months 1-6

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants including participants with missing data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Incidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-6 (Months 1-6)0.2 gout flares/monthStandard Error 0.1
SEL-212B (High-dose)Incidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-6 (Months 1-6)0.4 gout flares/monthStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboIncidence of Gout Flare During Treatment Periods 1-6 (Months 1-6)0.3 gout flares/monthStandard Error 0.1
p-value: 0.65397.5% CI: [-0.55, 0.37]ANOVA
p-value: 0.62997.5% CI: [-0.36, 0.56]ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Mean sUA

Time frame: Baseline, Up to 6 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants including participants with missing data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Percentage Change From Baseline in Mean sUA-58.7 percentage changeStandard Error 8
SEL-212B (High-dose)Percentage Change From Baseline in Mean sUA-64.2 percentage changeStandard Error 7.1
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Mean sUA5.6 percentage changeStandard Error 6.8
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [-87.85, -40.85]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [-92.16, -47.35]ANCOVA
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction of sUA < 6 mg/dL for at Least 80% of the Time During Month 6 in the Subset of Participants With Tophi at Baseline

The number of responders in the subgroup of Intent-to-Treat participants with tophi at baseline divided by the number of Intent-to-Treat participants with tophi at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants, including participants with missing outcome measure data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with tophi at baseline and evaluable data for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Proportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction of sUA < 6 mg/dL for at Least 80% of the Time During Month 6 in the Subset of Participants With Tophi at Baseline0.50 proportion of participants
SEL-212B (High-dose)Proportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction of sUA < 6 mg/dL for at Least 80% of the Time During Month 6 in the Subset of Participants With Tophi at Baseline0.34 proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained Reduction of sUA < 6 mg/dL for at Least 80% of the Time During Month 6 in the Subset of Participants With Tophi at Baseline0.07 proportion of participants
p-value: 0.003597.5% CI: [0.14, 0.72]Chi-squared
p-value: 0.042897.5% CI: [-0.02, 0.57]Chi-squared
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With at Least Partial Response (PR) (as Best Response) in Overall Tophus Response Evaluation in Participants With Tophi at Baseline

Baseline photographs of the hands and feet of each participant were obtained using a standardized method in all participants together with photographs of up to 2 other representative sites of tophaceous disease. The baseline photographs were assessed by three independent reviewers to prospectively identify sites of tophaceous disease present at the start of treatment. Up to 5 tophi in the photographs were chosen by the reviewers for measurement over the course of therapy. The reviewers assessed the photographs for size of each target tophus using image analysis software. At least PR was defined as at least a 50% decrease in the area of at least one tophus, and includes participants with complete response (CR). Data are presented for the proportion of participants with at least PR (as best response).

Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat Set, which included all randomized and dosed participants, including participants with missing outcome measure data that were multiple imputed. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with tophi at baseline and evaluable data for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SEL-212A (Low-dose)Proportion of Participants With at Least Partial Response (PR) (as Best Response) in Overall Tophus Response Evaluation in Participants With Tophi at Baseline1.00 proportion of participants
SEL-212B (High-dose)Proportion of Participants With at Least Partial Response (PR) (as Best Response) in Overall Tophus Response Evaluation in Participants With Tophi at Baseline0.67 proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With at Least Partial Response (PR) (as Best Response) in Overall Tophus Response Evaluation in Participants With Tophi at Baseline0.42 proportion of participants
p-value: 0.000397.5% CI: [0.25, 0.91]Chi-squared
p-value: 0.189597.5% CI: [-0.36, 0.86]Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026