Skip to content

His-pacing and AV-node Ablation vs. Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation

Physiological Pacemaker Treatment in Combination With AV Node Ablation Compared With Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation - a Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04512586
Acronym
His-PAAF
Enrollment
45
Registered
2020-08-13
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2025-02-26
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Dilatation

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation, Left atrial dilatation, Pulmonary vein isolation, AV node ablation, Conduction System pacing, Quality of Life, Age group 70 to 85 years

Brief summary

Objective To investigate if conduction system pacing ((CSP) i.e. atrioventricular node ablation + His bundle pacing or Left Bundle Branch pacing) is as good as (or better than) atrial fibrillation ablation with pulmonary vein isolation for older patients (70-85yrs) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and at least moderately dilated left atrium. Patient population: 90 patients aged 70-85 years with atrial fibrillation, referred to either AV node ablation or pulmonary vein isolation. Primary endpoint: Improvement in health-related quality of life as measured by the physical component summary (PCS) of the well-validated SF-36 form, at one year after AV node ablation + CSP or AF ablation. Secondary endpoints: Physical performance measured by 6-minute walk test, biochemical markers of heart failure (NT-ProBNP), frequency of complications, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and left atrial size evaluated after 12 months. Arrhythmia specific symptoms and anxiety will be measured with the ASTA and HADS questionnaires. Arrhythmia symptom correlation between subjective and objective findings. After three years, clinical endpoints will be evaluated regarding overall survival, and risk of heart failure hospitalization or death. The cost of the treatments will be compared, and estimated cost per quality adjusted year of life will be calculated, based on the EQ5D questionnaire.

Interventions

PROCEDUREConduction System pacing and AV node ablation

See study arm description.

PROCEDUREAtrial fibrillation ablation by pulmonary vein isolation

See study arm description

Sponsors

Region Skane
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients are randomized to either 1. Conduction system pacing via His-pacing electrode, in combination with AV node ablation 2. Pulmonary vein isolation ablation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Indication for invasive treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation according to current guidelines * LVEF \>35% * Age 70-85 years * Persistent atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with at least moderate enlargement of the left atrium (≥42ml/m2) * Chronic and well-tolerated treatment with anticoagulants (either non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist) * Willingness to participate, to understand the instructions and fill out the questionnaires, and ability to sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic atrial fibrillation with \>1 year duration * BMI \>40kg/m2 * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy * Severe heart failure with symptoms ≥ NYHA class IIIb * Heart amyloidosis * Cardiac sarcoidosis * Recent (\<3 months) myocardial infarction * Significant heart valve disease (pronounced insufficiency or stenosis) * Pacemaker or ICD treatment ongoing, or current pacemaker indication * Congenital heart disease that required surgical correction * Comorbidity that is assessed significantly affect the patient's quality of life over the next year, or 3-year survival

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health related Quality of Life: questionnaire12 monthsImprovement in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-36 questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mental Quality of Life: questionnaire12 monthsImprovement of the mental health related quality of life, measured by the mental component summary (MCS) of the SF-36 questionnaire
Arrhythmia related Quality of Life: ASTA questionnaire12 monthsChange in arrhythmia related quality of life as measured by the The Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia. The ASTA questionnaire consists of 13 items, each with a score of 0-4. A higher score denotes more symptoms associated with the arrhythmia. and Arrhythmia (ASTA) questionnaire
Anxiety and depression12 monthsAnxiety and depression symptoms, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The scale consists of 14 questions with 0 to 3 points for each, with a higher score denoting more depression/anxiety
Ejection fraction12 monthsChange in left ventricular systolic ejection fraction
Biomarker for heart failure12 monthsChange in NT-ProBNP level
Safety endpoint: Proportion of patients with major adverse events12 monthsProportion of patients with major adverse events that are devicerelated or related to ablation procedure (including but not limited to exit block, infection, perforation/tamponade, pericardial effusion, lead dislodgement, TIA/stroke, oesophago-atrial fistula, groin hematoma or vascular complication, pseudoaneurysm, phrenic nerve injury).
Electrocardiography changes12 monthsChange in QRS duration on ECG
Health economy12 monthsTotal atrial fibrillation and device related health care cost
Survival3 yearsTotal survival and survival free of major complications
Hospitalization for heart failure3 yearsRisk of hospitalization for heart failure assessed by Kaplan Meier time dependent analysis using time from ablation to first hospitalization for heart failure within three years
Physical performance12 monthsChange in six minute walk test distance

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026