Postoperative Pain
Conditions
Keywords
postoperative pain, root canal treatment, reciprocal motion, rotary motion
Brief summary
Postoperative pain is a common symptom of a flare up after root canal treatments (RCTs). Insufficient instrumentation, extrusion of irrigation solutions and debris and existence of a periapical lesion are the factors affecting postoperative pain after root canal treatments. Aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative pain and instrumentation time of single-file reciprocating system and multiple-file Ni-Ti rotary system in children ages between 9-12. Study was conducted on fifty first permanent mandibular molars with the diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis. Patients were randomly separated into two groups and RCTs were completed with either Reciproc Blue or Protaper Next file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted and patients were given a pain scale which included visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment. Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with chi square test and student t test. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between Reciproc Blue and Protaper Next systems at all time intervals. Instrumentation time was significantly shorter in the Reciproc Blue group in comparison with the Protaper Next group. In conclusion, shorter treatment time of single-file reciprocating systems may be more patient friendly and comfortable than multiple-file rotary systems in RCTs among children.
Interventions
Patients were randomly separated into two groups and root canal treatments were completed with Protaper Next file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted and patients were given a pain scale which included visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment.Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with chi square test and student t test.
Patients were randomly separated into two groups and root canal treatments were completed with Reciproc Blue file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted and patients were given a pain scale which included visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment.Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with chi square test and student t test.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with first permanent mandibular molar teeth which had been diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with no periapical pathology or abscess were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who were on antibiotics or analgesics preoperatively were not included in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Pain Assessment After 6 hours | 6 hours after treatment | Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain). |
| Postoperative Pain Assessment After 24 hours | 24 hours after treatment | Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain). |
| Postoperative Pain Assessment After 48 hours | 48 hours after treatment | Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain). |
| Postoperative Pain Assessment After 72 hours | 72 hours after treatment | Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Instrumentation Time | During procedure | The time for root canal instrumentation was recorded after working length determination until the end of instrumentation including irrigation between file changes within the sequence. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)