Skip to content

Suction Drainage in the Management of Peri-operative Bleeding in Total and Unicomcompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

The Role of Suction Drainage in the Management of Peri-operative Bleeding in Total and Unicomcompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: a Comparative Retrospective Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04508101
Enrollment
153
Registered
2020-08-11
Start date
2020-08-07
Completion date
2020-09-04
Last updated
2020-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Loss, Surgical

Keywords

suction drainage, total knee arthtoplasty, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Brief summary

Although, suction drainage is routinely used in orthopedic clinical practice, there are still no precise guidelines on its use in total joint arthroplasty, particularly in total as well as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. In fact, drain use is likely associated to an increased risk of blood transfusion due to the lack of tamponade effect, as well as a higher infection rate. Furthermore, the drain itself could interfere with knee mobilization, delaying its functional recovery. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the real usefulness of suction drainage in perioperative bleeding control in the management of total as well as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Detailed description

Knee arthroplasty is currently a widespread treatment either for osteoarthritis (OA) as well as other joint disorders. Specifically, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly considered one of the most effective orthopedic procedure in the treatment of end-stage knee OA as well as various rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, leading to a substantial pain relief and functional improvement. Besides, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) represents a viable alternative in the treatment of unicompartmental knee OA showing a lower morbidity. Nevertheless, since knee arthroplasty involves soft tissue dissections and numerous bone cuts, several perioperative complications can be observed. Particularly, the subsequent local hemorrhage can lead to anemia, functional limitation, nerve palsy as well as increase in wound tension resulting in healing impairment. Moreover, the local hematoma could represent a growth environment for bacteria. Although TKA usually shows a higher hemorrhage rate, some patients undergoing UKA still show the aforementioned complications. Accordingly, intraarticular suction drainage placement can likely ease the hematoma drain, leading to swelling decrease, surgical wound healing improvement as well as reduction of postoperative infections. However, despite suction drainage is routinely used in TKA as well as UKA, there are still no precise guidelines and its effectiveness remains controversial. Indeed, drain use is likely associated to an increased risk of blood transfusion due to the lack of tamponade effect, as well as a higher infection rate. Moreover, the drainage conduit could obstruct physiotherapy leading to a delayed recovery. Therefore, since fast-track program has been increasingly applied in the management of TKA and UKA, an early drainage removal is recommended. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the real usefulness of suction drainage in perioperative bleeding control in the management of TKA and UKA.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* knee osteoarthritis diagnosis * No contraindications to antithrombotic prophylaxis * Availability of blood tests results before surgery as well as in the first three postoperative days. * Detailed description of clinical records

Exclusion criteria

* contraindications to antithrombotic prophylaxis * anti-platelet therapy * knee arthroplasty revision indication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemoglobin trend4 daysHemoglobin values comparison between the two groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee swelling5 daysEvaluation of knee swelling during hospitalization (knee circumference variation \> 2 cm)
Wound bleeding5 daysEvaluation of wound bleeding during hospitalization (number of dressing changed)
Need for transfusion5 daysEvaluation of transfusion rate during hospitalization (number of transfusions preformed)

Contacts

Primary ContactPIERLUIGI PIRONTI, MD
pierluigi.pironti@libero.it+39 3385362097

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026