Skip to content

Helmet vs Face Mask in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Comparison of The Clinical Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation by Helmet vs Facemask in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04507802
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-08-11
Start date
2020-08-31
Completion date
2021-08-31
Last updated
2020-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute Respiratory Failure, Corona Virus Disease, Noninvasive Ventilation

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation with helmet in reducing endotracheal intubation rates in comparison with Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) facemask among patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Interventions

DEVICENon invasive ventilation via helmet

Patients requiring long hours of noninvasive ventilation via facemask will switch to non-invasive ventilation using a helmet

Sponsors

Hamad Medical Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) ARDS as per Berlin definition * Age: 18 and more

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with altered sensorium \[Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 13\] * Pregnancy * Hemodynamic instability * Morbidly obese * Patients with tracheostomy * Severe acidosis \[PH less than 7.15\] * Patients with glaucoma * Patients with history of vertigo

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for Endotracheal Intubation6 weeksNumber of patients requiring endotracheal intubation after application of helmet device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ventilator-free Days28 daysDuration of mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay4 weeksNumber of days admitted to intensive care unit
Overall Mortality90 daysDeath from any cause during hospitalization at time of enrollment
Improvement in Oxygen Saturation2 weeksImprovement of oxygenation-defined as PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 200 or increase from baseline by 100
Intensive Care Unit Mortality28 daysDeath from any cause during ICU hospitalization at time of enrollment
Patient Tolerability28 days from randomizationthe degree to which overt adverse effects of a drug can be tolerated by a patient including feeding tolerance
Need for Proningup to 24 weeksNeed for proning during the hospital stay

Countries

Qatar

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Z Peediyakkal, MD
MPeediyakkal2@hamad.qa0097450742399
Backup ContactAbdulqadir J Nashwan, MSc
anashwan@hamad.qa0097466473549

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026