Skip to content

The Effect of Traction Forces in People With Obesity Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain

The Effect of Traction Forces on Changes in Biochemical Markers of Degeneration and Functional Parameters of the Spine in People With Obesity Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04507074
Enrollment
49
Registered
2020-08-10
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2025-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain, Obesity

Keywords

biomarkers of low back pain, inflammation, disk degeneration, traction therapy, lumbar traction

Brief summary

The purpose of the research study is to assess the impact of traction forces on changes in systemic markers concentrations of spinal structure damage in people with obesity. The research group will include 40 subjects aged 35-60 with simple obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2) and chronic lumbar spine pain syndrome. The control group will consist of 20 subjects with normal body weight suffering from the same pain, at a similar age to the patients in the study group. Persons will be qualified for examination by a specialist in internal medicine and a physiotherapist. To assess the degree of structural damage within the intervertebral disc and adjacent anatomical structures, patients will undergo magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine (MRI 1.5T, standard in 3 projections). Patients will undergo traction therapy under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The application of traction forces on the traction table (ST6567P-SEERSMEDICAL) will last 30 minutes a day for 4 weeks (continuous traction mode with a maximum strength of 30% of the patient's body weight). Twice, before and after therapy, the following will be assessed: (1) body composition (by DXA method), (2) other anthropometric indicators, (3) functional parameters of the spine: mobility (electrogoniometer), muscle bioelectric signal amplitude (electromyograph), soft tissue biophysical parameters (myotonometer), (4) pain threshold and intensity in the lumbar region (using an algometer and validated questionnaires), (5) disability caused by pain in the spine (Oswestry questionnaire), (6) blood biochemical indicators selected on the basis of the latest research on biomarkers of spinal damage (for this purpose, 25ml venous blood will be taken from the subjects). Blood levels of interleukin-17, interleukin-4, interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-10 (IL-10), differentiating growth factor 15 (GDF-15), leptin, adipsin, chemokine CCL5 (RANTES), stem cell growth factor β (SCGF-β), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), neuropeptide Y, and chondroitin sulfate CS846 will be determined in the blood of the subjects. It is planned to assess the relationship of the studied biomarkers with the degree of disk degeneration, obesity, lean and fat body mass, pain intensity, and functional indicators of the spine. Patients will be asked to stop taking anti-inflammatory drugs during therapy and at least 24 hours prior to blood sampling.

Detailed description

People suffering from obesity are particularly vulnerable to mechanical compression of the intervertebral discs, and as a result their degeneration, hernia and pressure on the nerve roots, which together cause inflammation and pain in the damaged area. This is a significant public health problem due to the 100% incidence of pain syndrome among people with obesity. The use of traction forces has beneficial effects on degenerated intervertebral discs, but there are no studies assessing the effectiveness of the traction method in relation to a group of obese people with back pain syndrome. Beneficial biochemical changes in the blood, alleviation of pain, improvement of functional parameters of the spine are expected after application of traction forces to the patients in the mechanism of decompression of the destroyed and being in chronic inflammation intervertebral discs. Identification of biomarkers enabling to monitor the effects of therapies in patients with chronic back pain can become a contribution to change standards in the diagnosis of back pain and reorientation in its treatment to real causes.

Interventions

DEVICElumbar traction therapy

The application of traction forces on the traction table (ST6567P-SEERSMEDICAL) will last 30 minutes a day for 4 weeks (continuous traction mode with a maximum strength of 30% of the patient's body weight).

Sponsors

Poznan University of Physical Education
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Written consent to participate in the study, 2. Age: 35 - 60 years, 3. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2) or normal weight (BMI 18,5-29,9 kg/m2), 4. Stable body weight in the last month ± 2 kg, 5. Chronic low back pain.

Exclusion criteria

1. Secondary form of obesity; 2. Serious neurological defects (including large muscle losses, sensory disturbances in a large area of the lower limb, occurrence of cauda equina syndrome); 3. Surgery, post-accident mechanical injuries, history of spine fractures; 4. History of rheumatic disease (RA, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus); 5. Osteoporosis; 6. Pain located in a location other than the spine which is more severe than the low back pain; 7. Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes; 8. Poorly controlled hypertension (mean systolic blood pressure\> 140mmHg and / or average diastolic blood pressure\> 90mmHg) during the last month and / or the necessity of modification of pharmacological treatment; 9. Lipid disorders requiring the introduction of pharmacological treatment in the last 3 months before observation or during observation; 10. Acute coronary event, unstable angina, stroke or transient cerebral ischemia in the last 6 months; 11. Features of heart failure in physical examination and / or additional tests (chest X-ray, echocardiography); 12. Clinically significant arrhythmias, conduction disorders, pacemaker implantation; 13. Fainting in an interview, 14. Chronic kidney disease with creatinine clearance \<60mL / min / 1.73m2; 15. Clinically significant liver dysfunction (transaminases exceeding 3 times the normal range); 16. Acute or chronic, clinically apparent inflammatory process of the respiratory tract, inflammatory processes of the genitourinary system, inflammatory process in the head and neck; 17. Acute infection in the last month; 18. Cancer; 19. Alcohol abuse, drug addiction; 20. Pregnancy; 21. Uncontrolled mental illness that may falsify test results; 22. Other conditions which may pose any risk to the patient during the observation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interleukin-2, interleukin-4, interleukin-10, interleukin-17, RANTES, differentiating growth factor 15 (GDF-15) [pg/ml]pre-interventionELISA
Stem cell growth factor β [ng/ml]pre-interventionELISA
Leptin [ng/ml]pre-interventionELISA
Adipsin [pg/ml]pre-interventionELISA
Neuropeptide Y [pg/ml]pre-interventionELISA
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor [pg/ml]pre-interventionELISA
Chondroitin sulfate CS846 [ng/mL]pre-interventionELISA

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Logarithmic decrement of natural oscillation, characterizing elasticity of erector spinae musclespre-interventionBiomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Pain thresholdpre-interventionalgometer
Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spinepre-interventionMRI 1.5T
Disability caused by pain in the spinepre-interventionOswestry questionnaire. When completing the questionnaire, the subject answers questions concerning: pain intensity, independence, lifting objects, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, sexual activity and traveling. The answers to the questions help to classify how limited the functioning of the patient is while performing certain activities. Responses are graded from 0 to 5. The overall score is given on a 0-50 point scale, where the higher the score, the greater the disability.
Pain intensity: questionnairepre-interventionvisual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity questionare (reporting a score on a 10-point scale, the minimum (0) means no pain and the maximum (10) means a worst pain imaginable
Total body fat content [%]pre-interventiondual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Lean body mass [kg]pre-interventiondual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Mobility of the spinepre-interventionelectrogoniometer
Muscle bioelectric signal amplitudepre-interventionelectromyograph
State of tension of erector spinae muscles [Hz]pre-interventionNatural oscillation frequency \[Hz\], characterizing Tone or Tension will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Dynamic stiffness of erector spinae muscles [N/m]pre-interventionBiomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 1, 2026