Skip to content

Oxytocin and Approach-avoid in Grief

A Pull to be Close: the Differentiating Effects of Oxytocin and Grief Stimulus Type on Approach Behavior in Complicated Grief

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04505904
Enrollment
44
Registered
2020-08-10
Start date
2015-03-20
Completion date
2017-05-12
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bereavement, Prolonged Grief Disorder

Keywords

Oxytocin, Approach/Avoid, Older adults, Complicated Grief

Brief summary

This is a completed project which was initiated prior to January 18,2017 Background: Theoretical models of complicated grief (CG) suggest that maladaptive approach (e.g., perseverative proximity-seeking of the deceased) or avoidance (e.g., excessive avoidance of reminders) behaviors interfere with a person's ability to integrate the loss and recover from their loved one's death. Due in part to conflicting evidence, little mechanistic understanding of how these behaviors develop in grief exists. We sought to (1) identify behavioral differences between CG and non-CG groups based on implicit bias for grief-, deceased-, and social-related stimuli, and (2) test the role of the neuropeptide oxytocin in shaping approach/avoidance bias. Methods: Widowed older adults with and without CG completed an approach/avoidance task measuring implicit bias for personalized, non-specific, grief-related, and other stimuli. In a double-blinded, randomized, counterbalanced design, each participant attended both an intranasal oxytocin session and a placebo session. Aims were to (1) identify differential effects of CG and stimulus type on implicit approach/avoidance bias \[placebo session\], and (2) investigate interactive effects of CG, stimulus type, and oxytocin vs. placebo on approach/avoidance bias \[both sessions\].

Interventions

Synthetic oxytocin spray, 24 IU per spray.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo spray with no active ingredient.

Sponsors

University of Arizona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• Adult individual experiencing death of a spouse or partner between 6 and 36 months prior to enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to comprehend English; * medical contraindications for other components of the study, * active suicidality * active homicidality * active psychotic symptoms * ongoing major health conditions such as cancer; uncontrolled hypertension; and medications likely to impact the oxytocin system (e.g., systemic corticosteroids). * pregnant status or suspected pregnant status * premenopausal status

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task.120 minutesParticipants completed the approach avoid task twice per session, with reversed instructions on the second run (i.e., pull for yellow became push for yellow). Each seven-minute run of the task consisted of 144 2500ms trials (288 trials per visit, 576 trials total across runs/sessions; 500ms inter-trial-interval). Order of instructions (i.e., push yellow vs. pull yellow) was randomized and counterbalanced across participants and sessions, to address potential for order effects/habituation. Stimuli were presented via Inquisit 4 (2014), in a pseudorandomized order determined by genetic algorithm (Wager & Nichols, 2003). Relative approach/avoidance bias was computed by subtracting median response time (RT; latency to joystick full extension) on PULL/approach trials in each stimulus category from PUSH/avoid trials in the same category (Rinck & Becker, 2007). Positive response bias values indicate relative approach bias; negative values indicate relative avoidance bias.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Complicated Grief
Crossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates the Complicated grief group, as designated to \>25 cutoff score on standardized measure (the Inventory of Complicated Grief). All participants in this group received both synthetic oxytocin and placebo Syntocinon: Synthetic oxytocin spray, 24 IU per spray. Placebo: Placebo spray with no active ingredient.
17
Noncomplicated Grief
Crossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates the noncomplicated grief group, as divided based on cutoff score on standardized measure (the Inventory of Complicated Grief) Syntocinon: Synthetic oxytocin spray, 24 IU per spray. Placebo: Placebo spray with no active ingredient.
22
Total39

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicComplicated GriefNoncomplicated GriefTotal
Age, Continuous68.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.68
69.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.68
69.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.68
Beck Depression Inventory - II16.41 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.86
10.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants22 Participants37 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Inventory of Complicated Grief35.18 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
14.47 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.36
23.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants22 Participants38 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants22 participants39 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants19 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants3 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 390 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 391 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 390 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Reaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task.

Participants completed the approach avoid task twice per session, with reversed instructions on the second run (i.e., pull for yellow became push for yellow). Each seven-minute run of the task consisted of 144 2500ms trials (288 trials per visit, 576 trials total across runs/sessions; 500ms inter-trial-interval). Order of instructions (i.e., push yellow vs. pull yellow) was randomized and counterbalanced across participants and sessions, to address potential for order effects/habituation. Stimuli were presented via Inquisit 4 (2014), in a pseudorandomized order determined by genetic algorithm (Wager & Nichols, 2003). Relative approach/avoidance bias was computed by subtracting median response time (RT; latency to joystick full extension) on PULL/approach trials in each stimulus category from PUSH/avoid trials in the same category (Rinck & Becker, 2007). Positive response bias values indicate relative approach bias; negative values indicate relative avoidance bias.

Time frame: 120 minutes

Population: Of note, for analysis purposes, we collapsed across crossover groups to yield two groups, complicated grief and non-complicated grief. This is consistent with reporting methods of other relevant literature in this area and allows for direct conceptual comparison to these previous studies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
With Complicated GriefReaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task.Syntocinon First29 Milliseconds (contrast score)Standard Deviation 21
With Complicated GriefReaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task.Placebo First7.5 Milliseconds (contrast score)Standard Deviation 21
Noncomplicated Grief GroupReaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task.Syntocinon First18 Milliseconds (contrast score)Standard Deviation 18.9
Noncomplicated Grief GroupReaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task.Placebo First13.0 Milliseconds (contrast score)Standard Deviation 11.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026