Skip to content

Effect of Chlorhexidine-Induced Oral Care on Ventilator-Related Some Respiratory System Complications

Effect of Chlorhexidine-Induced Oral Care on Ventilator-Related Some Respiratory System Complications in Patients With Mechanical Ventilation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04505202
Enrollment
57
Registered
2020-08-10
Start date
2019-04-15
Completion date
2020-09-03
Last updated
2020-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tracheobronchitis, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Brief summary

Ventilator-associated pneumonia and ventilator-associated treakeabronchitis in respiratory tract infections associated with ventilator are common infections in intensive care unit and cause significant morbidity, mortality and health expenditures in nosocomial infections. Adequate and effective oral care by nurses in intensive care patients, possible complications, intensive care unit stay in the intensive care unit and is very important in terms of mortality.

Detailed description

The aim of this study will (1) evaluate the effect of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate on ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-associated treakeabronchitis, (2) determine the effect of preventing microorganism colonization, and (3) assess the mortality rate for each patient and the cost-effectiveness in the health expenditures.

Interventions

DRUG0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate

The patients included in the experimental group (0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate) will receive 3 times daily oral care

DRUGPlacebo

The patients included in the placebo group ( sodium bicarbonate) will receive 3 times daily oral care

Sponsors

Karabuk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Admission in critical care with in 24 hours * Having an endotracheal tube

Exclusion criteria

* History of chlorhexidine allergy * Duration of mechanichal ventilation less than 48 h * Confirmed diagnosis of pneumonitis before admission in the ICU * Transfer from another ICU * Receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy * Patients with immunodeficiency * Patients with tracheostomies * Required specific oral hygiene procedures * Facio-maxillary or dental trauma/surgery * Being pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pathogen colonization changechange from baseline pathogen colonization at Day 3We will examine microbiological analyses ( mini-BAL, oropharyngeal and tracheal secretions)
Oral assessment guide score changeat the time of admission into the study (day 0), at study day 2 and at day 3The score ranges from 8 to 24 and higher scores indicating worse oral health
Clinical pulmonary infection score changeat the time of admission into the study (day 0), at study day 2 and at day 3The score ranges from 0 to 12 (ventilator-associated pneumonia ≥ 6 )
rate of tracheobronchitis changechange from baseline the rate of tracheobronchitis at Day 3Questionary (use the rate of tracheobronchitis categories)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cost effectivenessDay 30We used the decision tree modelling for estimating the cost-effectiveness of antiseptic solutions.
MortalityDay 7 and Day 28rate of mortality

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026