Skip to content

Early Versus Routine Drain Removal After Live Liver Donor Hepatectomy

Early Versus Routine Drain Removal After Live Liver Donor Hepatectomy- a Randomized Controlled, Open Label, Pilot Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04504487
Enrollment
108
Registered
2020-08-07
Start date
2021-01-28
Completion date
2022-02-25
Last updated
2022-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Transplant

Brief summary

It's a randomized control trial to compare early drain removal versus standard drain removal after donor hepatectomy in terms of donor outcomes. We will analyse the data and elucidate the safety of early drain removal using 3x3 rule with routine drain removal.

Detailed description

* Prophylactic abdominal drainage after donor right hepatectomy for LDLT has been a common or even mandatory practice in most transplant centres. * This serves to monitor the occurrence of postoperative intraabdominal bleeding and is used for the detection and drainage of any bile leakage. * Below table mentions both advantages and disadvantages of prophylactic drain placement after hepatectomy. Advantages 1. Early detection of haemorrhage 2. Early detection of bile leak 3. Early reintervention Disadvantages 1\. Increased rates of intraabdominal and wound infection, 2. Increased abdominal pain, 3. Decreased pulmonary function, 4. Prolonged hospital stay, 5. Bowel injury. * Our study in ILBS for ALF donors, the overall complication rate was 20% as per Clavien-Dindo classification, of which a majority (15.9%) had grade 1 or 2 complications. Major complications (3b and above) were seen in 4 (1.0%) patients. Biliary complications were noted in 1.7% only. * In a study by Japanese group concluded that 3 × 3 rule is clinically feasible and allows for the early removal of the drain tube with minimum infection risk after liver resection. The ''3 x 3 rule'': the drain will be removed when the drain fluid bilirubin concentration is \<3 mg/dl on day 3 after operation. * In our institute we remove drain routinely, when output is less than 100ml and serous. That is usually on postoperative day 5-7. * There is no randomized control trail done in donor hepatectomy comparing early versus standard drain removal.

Interventions

OTHERDrain Removal

Abdominal drain placed during surgery removal

Sponsors

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* • Donors evaluated as per institutional protocol for donor hepatectomy and found fit * Those who consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients refusing to consent for inclusion in the study. * Left lateral hepatectomy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
safety of drain removal using 3x3 rule - overall complications.patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgeryComprehensive complication index (CCI) - clavin dindo classification

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bile leakpatient will be followed upto 3 months after surgerystandard ISGLS definition - drain bilirubin measured in mg/dl.
Length of hospital staypatient will be followed upto 3 months after surgerycalculated from the day of admission to day of discharge, and based on the number of nights spent in hospital
Post operative pain reliefpatient will be followed upto 3 months after surgeryusing Visual analogue score
reintervention ratepatient will be followed upto 3 months after surgerydefined as any additional abdominal intervention ( surgical or radiological) during the same hospital stay after the primary operation
readmission ratepatient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery90 day readmission rate - any hospital admission after the index admission.
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgerypatient has at least one of the following: 1. purulent drainage from the superficial incision. 2. organism(s) identified from an aseptically-obtained specimen from the superficial incision or subcutaneous tissue by a culture or non-culture based microbiologic testing method which is performed for purposes of clinical diagnosis or treatment (for example, not Active Surveillance Culture/Testing (ASC/AST)). 3. superficial incision that is deliberately opened by a surgeon, physician\* or physician designee and culture or non-culture based testing of the superficial incision or subcutaneous tissue is not performed AND patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: localized pain or tenderness; localized swelling; erythema; or heat. 4. diagnosis of a superficial incisional SSI by a physician\* or physician designee.

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026