Skip to content

Influence of Patient Decision-Making Aids for Patients With Unilateral Ureteral Stone: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

Influence of Patient Decision-Making Aids for Patients With Unilateral Ureteral Stone: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04504084
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-08-07
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2020-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Decision Aids, Shared Decision Making, Ureteral Stone

Brief summary

Ureteral stone is a common disease with high prevalence and recurrence rate in Taiwan. Taiwan is located in subtropical zone, where urolithiasis is commonly seen. A national survey in Taiwan determined that 9.6% of the population suffered stones throughout their lifetime. Symptoms of ureteral stone include renal colic, hematuria, and urinary tract infection. Without proper treatment, ureteral stone could lead to renal function impairment such as acute kidney injury (AKI) or chronic kidney disease (CKD). There are several treatment options for ureteral stone, such as ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), flexible urteroscopic lithotripsy (F-URSL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), and Medical expulsive therapy (MET). However, there are only few minutes from diagnosis of ureteral stone to possible treatment options explanation. It's difficult for patients to well understand all the details of possible treatments under such circumstances. Therefore, we design a patient decision aid (PDA) for unilateral ureteral stone to help patients understand all the treatment options. The PDA is standardized, written in plain language and patient-centered, with pictures attached.

Detailed description

Background: Shared decision making (SDM) has been defined as: 'an approach where clinicians and patients share the best available evidence when faced with the task of making decisions, and where patients are supported to consider options, to achieve informed preferences. To conduct SDM, a PDA was developed to be administered for patients with ureteral stone to choose treatment options. We expect the PDA would benefit the intervention group in the aspects of knowledge and communication in choosing treatment.The aim of this study is to conduct a single center randomized controlled trial (RCT ) to evaluate the benefit of PDAs on decision making. Patients and Methods: Decision aids are interventions designed to help patients with ureteral stone to choose their treatment options for unilateral ureteral stone and any potential outcome relevant to treatment options. Patients with unilateral ureteral stone are randomly assigned to receive a PDA (PDA group) or the standard oral information (control group) during consultation. In control group, patients will receive standard oral information. In PDA group group, PDA will be used as a tool to explain the benefits and harms between ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), flexible urteroscopic lithotripsy (F-URSL), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). And by following SDM principles, the patients are guided to consider their individual values and preferences and helped to make a choice that best meet their needs. This study will be conducted in a single center (Shuang Ho Hospital). The outcomes are decision conflicts and decision-making and SURE test before treatment. Hypothesis: We expect that the PDA would promote communications between doctors and patients, to further help the patient to make a proper decision for his/her own.

Interventions

OTHERDecision aid

Patient Decision Aid is a tool that helps patient with ureteral stone become involved in decision making on choosing treatment for ureteral stone. Patient Decision Aid provides information about the options and outcomes, and by clarifying personal values.

Sponsors

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ages between 18 and 75 * Ureteral stone diagnosed with KUB, IVP or CT * Stone size between 0 to 2 cm

Exclusion criteria

* Stone passage spontaneously * Patients who do not speak Mandarian * Patients with dementia * Nationality not Republic of China * Patients with bilateral ureteral stone * Patients with staghorn stone * Patients with bladder stone * Patients with severe infection * Pregnant women * Others patients could not communicate with

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decision conflictsFor patients choose URSL or F-URSL, one day before the operation. For patients choose ESWL, half an hour before the treatment.Total score of decisional conflict scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SURE testFor patients choose URSL or F-URSL, one day before the operation. For patients choose ESWL, half an hour before the treatment.Total score of SURE test

Contacts

Primary ContactYi-Te Chiang, MD
11229@s.tmu.edu.tw+886988261275

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026