Skip to content

Artoss Foot and Ankle Surgery Registry

Multicenter Prospective Registry to Evaluate Use and Outcomes of NanoBone in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04503759
Acronym
ARK
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-08-07
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
2024-05-10
Last updated
2024-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis Foot, Deformity; Bone, Trauma Injury

Brief summary

This prospective registry was designed as an observational study to ascertain how commercially available NanoBone products are being used by surgeons performing foot and ankle surgery which involves bone grafting, as well as determining relevant patient outcomes.

Detailed description

This multicenter prospective patient registry was developed with the aim of documenting how surgeons are utilizing NanoBone products in foot and ankle surgery along with relevant patient outcomes. These outcomes include radiographic measures such as fusion or graft consolidation success, instrumentation integrity, and clinical outcomes (symptom and function improvement) based on investigator and patient-based outcome assessments. The primary objective of this study is to document and analyze the use of NanoBone products in foot and ankle surgery (as a stand-alone bone graft, no other local bone, autograft, bone graft substitute, or biologic product used) and determine both radiographic success and clinical outcomes. All product related adverse events will be documented, tabulated, and summarized.

Interventions

Synthetic, biodegradable bone grafting material that is composed of non-sintered nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (HA) which is embedded in a silica gel matrix (amorphous SiO2). The ratio of HA/SiO2 has been chosen to optimize the rate of biodegradation for treatment of osseous defects in human bone. NanoBone does not contain any components of animal or human origin, eliminating the possibility of transmission of infection or disease.

Sponsors

Artoss Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient aged 18 years or older. * Patient is or was diagnosed with a pathology of the foot or ankle, having failed conservative treatment, and surgeon has determined that surgery with bone graft is medically necessary. * The surgeon has determined that NanoBone is or was clinically indicated. * NanoBone will be or was used as a stand-alone bone graft (no autograft, other bone graft substitute, or biologic planned or used). * Patient capable of understanding the content of the Informed Consent Form * Patient willing and able to participate in the registry protocol including the surgeon's standard follow-up visits and clinical evaluations. * Patient who has agreed to participate in the registry by providing consent according to the applicable local law and the declaration of Helsinki.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe vascular or neurological disease * Uncontrolled diabetes * Severe degenerative disease (other than degenerative disc disease) * Severely impaired renal function * Hypercalcemia, abnormal calcium metabolism * Existing acute or chronic infections, especially at the site of the operation * Inflammatory bone disease such as osteomyelitis * Malignant tumors * Patients who are or plan to become pregnant. * Uncooperative patients who cannot or will not follow post-operative instruction, including individuals who abuse drugs and/or alcohol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic Success6-monthsFusion/Graft Consolidation: Evidence of bony (osseous) bridging between the graft material and the patient's bone in the segment requiring fusion or reconstruction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Evaluation6-monthsOccurrence of Complications or Adverse Events

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Success6-monthsChange from baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain
Function6-monthsChange from baseline in Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026