Skip to content

Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of an Intervention Aimed At Reducing the Length of Stay After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Etude Multicentrique Évaluant L'efficacité D'une Intervention Visant À Réduire La Durée De Séjour Après L'implantation D'une Bioprothèse Aortique Par Voie Transfémorale

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04503655
Acronym
FAST-TAVI II
Enrollment
1842
Registered
2020-08-07
Start date
2020-12-16
Completion date
2022-02-09
Last updated
2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis, Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

TAVI, Aortic valve stenosis, Lenght-of-stay, Medico-economy

Brief summary

Since the first implantation of a percutaneous aortic bioprosthesis (TAVI) in 2002 (Cribier et al. Circulation 2002), TAVI occupies an increasing place in the management of aortic stenosis (AR) . Initially reserved for inoperable patients at high surgical risk, TAVI is also recommended in patients at intermediate risk, especially when a femoral approach (TF) is possible (Baumgartner et al. Eur Heart J. 2017). Currently, there is no recommendation regarding length of stay after TAVI and practices are extremely heterogeneous. Despite the growing experience of centers, better patient selection and a reduction in complications, the length of stay after TAVI remains very high in France. Faced with the great disparity observed between the centers, efforts are necessary to educate the centers in order to further reduce the length of stay after TF-TAVI. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training teams to reduce the length of stay after TF-TAVI.

Interventions

OTHERTraining

Training dedicated on implementation of organizational and therapeutic measures (for prevention and management of complications) to reduce lenght-of-stay after TF TAVI.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Rouen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

In this study, there is a randomization of the participating centres in two groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient over 18 years of age; 2. Patient hospitalized for TF-TAVI 3. Patient affiliated or benefiting from a health insurance scheme 4. Patient having read and understood the information letter and having signed the consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Proven pregnant woman (positive urine pregnancy test) or breastfeeding or absence of effective contraception (as defined by the WHO) or postmenopausal woman without confirmation diagnosis obtained (amenorrhea not medically induced for at least 12 months before the initiation visit) ; 1 2. Person deprived of their liberty by an administrative or judicial decision or person placed under the protection of justice / guardianship or curatorship 3. History of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participating in the protocol or preventing him from giving his informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component organizational interventionYear 1Proportion of patients benefiting from TF-TAVI with a length of stay less than or equal to 3 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the safety of the interventionDay 30This outcome will be evaluated using : * the average length of stay, * the 30-day rehospitalization rate and * the 30-day death rate.
To evaluate the budgetary impact of the interventionYear 1This outcome will be assessed using: * the hospital costs from the point of view of the hospital and * the financial gains for health insurance that would be associated with the generalization of the intervention in France.
To evaluate the implementation of the interventionYear 1This outcome will be evaluated using the rate of adherence of the centers to the procedures aiming to reduce the length of stay (questionnaires)
To identify the factors associated with the effectiveness and safety of the interventionYear 1This outcome will be assessed using factors associated with lengths of stay less than or equal to 3 days.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026