Skip to content

Double Guidewire Technique Versus Transpancreatic Precut in Patients With Repetitive Unintentional Cannulation of the Pancreatic Duct.

Double Guidewire Technique Versus Transpancreatic Precut in Patients With Repetitive Unintentional Cannulation of the Pancreatic Duct.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04503200
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-08-07
Start date
2020-08-15
Completion date
2022-08-30
Last updated
2020-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Common Bile Duct Diseases, Double Guidewire, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Precut, Transpancreatic Precut

Brief summary

Difficult cannulation of the common bile duct is encountered in about 10%of ERCP procedures. This frequently happens in the form of repeated unintentional cannulation of the pancreatic duct. Two valid options are available to facilitate cannulation at this point: Double guidewire technique or performing a transpancreatic precut. This is a randomized trial comparing the efficacy and Safety of double guidwire technique versus transpancreatic precut after three unintentional passages of the guidewire into the pancreatic duct.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDouble guidewire

After the 3rd passage of the guidewire into the pancreatic duct, the catheter will be removed leaving the guidewire in place. The catheter will be re-inserted and a second guidewire will be used and directed above the pancreatic wire in the 11-12 o'clock direction to attempt cannulation of the common bile duct.

PROCEDURETranspancreatic precut

After the 3rd passage of the guidewire unintentionally into the pancreatic duct, the guidewire will be left in the pancreatic duct, a sphincterotome will be used to cut in the direction of 11-12 o'clock attempting to deroof the pancreatic duct and gain access into the common bile duct. The wire will then be retracted and reinserted in the direction of the cut to attempt cannulation of the common bile duct.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* unintentional cannulation of the pancreatic duct 3 times * Consenting to join the study

Exclusion criteria

* Previous ERCP with or without previous sphincterotomy * Known coagulopathy * \- Pregnancy * \- Known acute pancreatitis at the time of procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cannulation successWithin 10 minutesProportion of patients with successful cannulation of the common bile duct
Rate of post-ERCP pancreatitisup to 24 hours after the procedureProportion of patients suffering post-ERCP pancreatitis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to successful cannulationWithin 10 minutesTime to achieve cannulation after the 3rd passage of the guidewire into the pancreatic duct

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactHany Shehab
h.shehab@kasralainy.edu.eg01111111071

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026