Skip to content

Control-IQ Observational (CLIO) Post-Approval Study

Control-IQ Observational (CLIO) Post-Approval Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04503174
Acronym
CLIO
Enrollment
3157
Registered
2020-08-07
Start date
2020-08-04
Completion date
2023-06-26
Last updated
2023-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Brief summary

Post-approval 522 study designed to collect primarily safety data on the US FDA-cleared product, t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology (Control-IQ system).

Detailed description

Post-approval study designed to collect primarily safety data on the US FDA-cleared product, t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology (Control-IQ system), by assessing the rate of severe hypoglycemia (SH) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) during the first 12 months of use. Secondary endpoints assessing the effectiveness of this product in real-world use by assessing the impact on patients' glycemic outcomes and user experience will also be collected. The Control-IQ system will be used as intended and in accordance with FDA-approved labeling.

Interventions

DEVICEt:slim X2 pump with Control-IQ technology

Real-world use

Sponsors

University of California, San Diego
CollaboratorOTHER
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with self-reported type 1 diabetes who have been prescribed the Control-IQ system. * At least 6 years of age * Using Humalog or Novolog insulin * For females, not pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next 12 months. * Agreement to use the t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology, and to continue use for at least 12 consecutive months after study enrollment. * Agree to provide HbA1c result, obtained within the 6-month period prior to enrollment. * Ability to respond to alerts and alarms, and to provide basic diabetes self-management. * Patients who reside full-time in the United States. * Willingness to download the t:connect Mobile application to their Smartphone and keep it active throughout the study. Patients unable to use t:connect Mobile application must be willing to manually upload their insulin pump data to t:connect every three months and at the completion of the study. * Subject has read, understood and agreed to participate in the study, and has electronically signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF).

Exclusion criteria

* Self-reported type 2 diabetes * \< 6 years of age * Use of any glucose-lowering therapy other than Humalog or Novolog insulin * Inability to respond to alerts and alarms, or to provide basic diabetes self-management. * Pregnancy * Subjects who have not signed the ICF.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)12 monthsOverall incidence rate of events per 100 patient years
Incidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)12 monthsOverall incidence rate of events per 100 patient years
Percent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the Feature12 monthsPercent of boluses using the auto population feature resulting in at least one reading less than 70 mg/dL than those not using the feature, in every pre-bolus glucose range examined.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Time Less Than 70 mg/dL12 monthsCGM measured percent time less than 70 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use
Percent Time Less Than 54 mg/dL12 monthsCGM measured percent time less than 54 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use
Percent Time in Range 70 - 180 mg/dL12 monthsCGM measured percent time in range 70 - 180 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use
Diabetes Impact and Satisfaction Scale (DIDS), Impact Score12 monthsDIDS impact score after 12 months of Control-IQ use. Score range from 0 -10 with lower scores indicating better outcome.
Diabetes Impact and Satisfaction Scale (DIDS), Satisfaction Score12 monthsDIDS satisfaction score after 12 months of Control-IQ use. Score range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Percent Time Greater Than 180 mg/dL12 monthsCGM measured percent time greater than 180 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use
Percent Time Greater Than 250 mg/dL12 monthsCGM measured percent time greater than 250 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

3157 participants completed the baseline survey and were enrolled, but only 3061 had started closed-loop and had adequate data available for analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Enrolled Participants
All participants who started the monthly surveys. t:slim X2 pump with Control-IQ technology: Real-world use
3,157
Total3,157

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Enrolled Participants
Age, Continuous29.0 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
271 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2819 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
67 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
60 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
78 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
184 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
67 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2628 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3157 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1759 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1398 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 3,061
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3,061
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 3,061

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)

Overall incidence rate of events per 100 patient years

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prior MDI UserIncidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)2.40 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 16.69
6-17 YOIncidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)1.93 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 13.78
Adults (18+)Incidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)1.46 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 13.1
No Prior CGM ExperienceIncidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)3.57 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 19.91
HbA1c Greater Than or Equal to 8%Incidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)2.47 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 16.5
HbA1c Less Than 8%Incidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)0.96 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 10.33
Prior Pump UserIncidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)1.26 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 11.56
Prior CGM ExperienceIncidence Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)1.37 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 12.02
Primary

Incidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)

Overall incidence rate of events per 100 patient years

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prior MDI UserIncidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)9.65 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 36.47
6-17 YOIncidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)9.31 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 34.31
Adults (18+)Incidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)9.77 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 36.97
No Prior CGM ExperienceIncidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)7.99 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 30.04
HbA1c Greater Than or Equal to 8%Incidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)9.58 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 37.03
HbA1c Less Than 8%Incidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)9.66 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 35.55
Prior Pump UserIncidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)9.61 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 36.06
Prior CGM ExperienceIncidence Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia (SH)9.87 events per 100 patient yearsStandard Deviation 36.99
Primary

Percent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the Feature

Percent of boluses using the auto population feature resulting in at least one reading less than 70 mg/dL than those not using the feature, in every pre-bolus glucose range examined.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Prior MDI UserPercent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the Feature70 to 180 mg/dL Correction Bolus Results within 5 hours after bolus (with CGM auto population)13.18 percentage of boluses
Prior MDI UserPercent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the Feature70 to 180 mg/dL Correction Bolus Results within 5 hours after bolus (no CGM auto population)14.52 percentage of boluses
Prior MDI UserPercent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the Feature181 to 250 mg/dL Correction Bolus Results within 5 hours after bolus (with CGM auto population)11.06 percentage of boluses
Prior MDI UserPercent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the Feature181 to 250 mg/dL Correction Bolus Results within 5 hours after bolus (no CGM auto population)15.61 percentage of boluses
Prior MDI UserPercent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the Feature> 250 mg/dL Correction Bolus Results within 5 hours after bolus (with CGM auto population)10.34 percentage of boluses
Prior MDI UserPercent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the Feature> 250 mg/dL Correction Bolus Results within 5 hours after bolus (no CGM auto population)13.50 percentage of boluses
Prior MDI UserPercent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the FeatureAll (with CGM auto population)12.22 percentage of boluses
Prior MDI UserPercent of Boluses Using the Auto Population Feature Resulting in Fewer Readings Less Than 70 mg/dL Than Those Not Using the FeatureAll (no CGM auto population)14.60 percentage of boluses
Secondary

Diabetes Impact and Satisfaction Scale (DIDS), Impact Score

DIDS impact score after 12 months of Control-IQ use. Score range from 0 -10 with lower scores indicating better outcome.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prior MDI UserDiabetes Impact and Satisfaction Scale (DIDS), Impact Score2.75 score on a scale
Secondary

Diabetes Impact and Satisfaction Scale (DIDS), Satisfaction Score

DIDS satisfaction score after 12 months of Control-IQ use. Score range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating better outcome.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prior MDI UserDiabetes Impact and Satisfaction Scale (DIDS), Satisfaction Score9.14 score on a scale
Secondary

Percent Time Greater Than 180 mg/dL

CGM measured percent time greater than 180 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prior MDI UserPercent Time Greater Than 180 mg/dL28.6 percentage of time
6-17 YOPercent Time Greater Than 180 mg/dL37.0 percentage of time
Adults (18+)Percent Time Greater Than 180 mg/dL37.2 percentage of time
No Prior CGM ExperiencePercent Time Greater Than 180 mg/dL31.4 percentage of time
Secondary

Percent Time Greater Than 250 mg/dL

CGM measured percent time greater than 250 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prior MDI UserPercent Time Greater Than 250 mg/dL6.3 percentage of time
6-17 YOPercent Time Greater Than 250 mg/dL12.8 percentage of time
Adults (18+)Percent Time Greater Than 250 mg/dL12.7 percentage of time
No Prior CGM ExperiencePercent Time Greater Than 250 mg/dL8.0 percentage of time
Secondary

Percent Time in Range 70 - 180 mg/dL

CGM measured percent time in range 70 - 180 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prior MDI UserPercent Time in Range 70 - 180 mg/dL70.1 percentage of time
6-17 YOPercent Time in Range 70 - 180 mg/dL60.9 percentage of time
Adults (18+)Percent Time in Range 70 - 180 mg/dL61.2 percentage of time
No Prior CGM ExperiencePercent Time in Range 70 - 180 mg/dL67.3 percentage of time
Secondary

Percent Time Less Than 54 mg/dL

CGM measured percent time less than 54 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prior MDI UserPercent Time Less Than 54 mg/dL0.2 percentage of time
6-17 YOPercent Time Less Than 54 mg/dL0.2 percentage of time
Adults (18+)Percent Time Less Than 54 mg/dL0.2 percentage of time
No Prior CGM ExperiencePercent Time Less Than 54 mg/dL0.2 percentage of time
Secondary

Percent Time Less Than 70 mg/dL

CGM measured percent time less than 70 mg/dL during 12 months of Control-IQ use

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prior MDI UserPercent Time Less Than 70 mg/dL1.1 percentage of time
6-17 YOPercent Time Less Than 70 mg/dL1.0 percentage of time
Adults (18+)Percent Time Less Than 70 mg/dL1.1 percentage of time
No Prior CGM ExperiencePercent Time Less Than 70 mg/dL1.1 percentage of time

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026