Skip to content

Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs. High-flow Nasal Cannula in Moderate-to-severe Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs. High-flow Nasal Cannula in Moderate-to-severe Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: an Open Label, Pilot, Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04502576
Acronym
HENIVOTpilot
Enrollment
110
Registered
2020-08-06
Start date
2020-10-13
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2024-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia

Brief summary

Helmet noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula are novel tools for the first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Compared to face-mask noninvasive ventilation in randomized trials, both have improved clinical outcome of patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. As compared to high-flow nasal cannula, helmet noninvasive ventilation improves oxygenation, reduces inspiratory effort, respiratory rate and dyspnea. Whether these physiological benefits are translated into improved outcome remains to be established. The investigators designed a randomized trial to establish whether first line treatment with Helmet noninvasive ventilation is capable of increasing the number of 28-day respiratory-support-free days, as compared to high-flow nasal cannula in patients with moderate-to-severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Interventions

In both arms, the treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge. Patients will have to undergo the allocated treatment within 1 hour from the moment of randomization and within 24 hours from admission in the intensive care unit

Sponsors

Università degli studi di Chieti
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Societa Italiana Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva
CollaboratorOTHER
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Acute-onset respiratory distress or flue-related symptoms Moderate-to-severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2\<=200 mmHg) PaCO2\<45 mmHg pH\>7.30

Exclusion criteria

Need for urgent endo-tracheal intubation Exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Documented pneumothorax Clinical diagnosis of Cardiogenic pulmonary oedema Do-not-intubate order Altered neurological status that requires immediate intubation and/or making the patient uncooperative Thoracic or abdominal surgery in the previous 7 days Recent head surgery or anatomy that prevent the application of helmet or Optiflow to patient's face

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory-support free days within 28 days from randomization28 daysThe number of days in which patients did not receive any form of respiratory support (i.e. high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Invasive ventilation-free days within 28 days from randomization28 daysThe number of days in which patients did not receive invasive mechanical ventilation
Invasive ventilation-free days within 60 days from randomization60 daysThe number of days in which patients did not receive invasive mechanical ventilation
Oxygenation28 daysThe ratio of PaO2 to FiO2 will be measured 1, 6, 12, 24 hours after randomization and then once daily up to intensive care unit discharge
Carbon dioxide28 daysPaCO2 will be measured 1, 6, 12, 24 hours after randomization and then once daily up to intensive care unit discharge
Dyspnea28 daysDyspnea will be evaluated through a visual analog scale (0-10, where 10 represents the most sever symptom) will be measured 1, 6, 12, 24 hours after randomization and then once daily up to intensive care unit discharge
Endotracheal intubation28 daysThe proportion of patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the two groups. The need for endotracheal intubation will be established with predefined criteria, which will be evaluated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee
In-intensive care unit mortality90 daysClinical outcome (dead/alive) at intensive care unit discharge
In-hospital mortality90 daysClinical outcome (dead/alive) at hospital discharge
90-day mortality90 daysClinical outcome (dead/alive) at 90 days after randomization
Quality of life after recovery1 yearQuality of life in survivors, assessed by Short Form-36 questionnaire
Respiratory rate28 daysRespiratory rate will be measured 1, 6, 12, 24 hours after randomization and then once daily up to intensive care unit discharge

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026