Skip to content

Hemodynamic Effect of Norepinephrine Versus Vasopressin on the Pulmonary Circulation in Cardiac Surgery Patients:

Hemodynamic Effect of Norepinephrine Versus Vasopressin on the Pulmonary Circulation in Cardiac Surgery Patients: a Comparative-effectiveness Quality Project

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04501861
Enrollment
164
Registered
2020-08-06
Start date
2020-11-05
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Disease

Brief summary

The relative increase in the mPAP with the same unit increase in MAP adjusted for baseline, and RV function assessed by GLS, between VP and NE in patients with normal and increased pulmonary artery pressure, who require vasopressor support during cardiac surgery.

Detailed description

The specific aims of our study are to compare 1) the relative increase in the mPAP with the same unit increase in MAP adjusted for baseline and 2) RV function assessed by GLS, between VP and NE in patients with normal and increased pulmonary artery pressure, who require vasopressor support during cardiac surgery. We hypothesize that the use of vasopressin compared with norepinephrine induces a lower mPAP-to-MAP ratio, in cardiac surgical patients with and without pulmonary hypertension who require intraoperative vasopressor support. Second, we will test the hypothesis that vasopressin is associated with improved right ventricular global longitudinal strain compared to norepinephrine in patients requiring vasopressor support during cardiac surgery.

Interventions

DRUGVasopressin

Vasopressin (20 IU/100 ml in 5% dextrose) were stored in pre-mixed bags in the operating room, readily available for continuous infusion administration via pre-programed infusion pumps

DRUGNorepinephrine

Norepinephrine (4 mg/250ml in 5% dextrose) were stored in pre-mixed bags in the operating room, readily available for continuous infusion administration via pre-programed infusion pumps

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized cluster crossover study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults\> 18 years of age * Elective cardiac surgery with the use of CPB * Patients with pulmonary artery catheter insertion * Systemic hypotension (MAP \< 70 mmHg) requiring continuous infusion of vasopressor

Exclusion criteria

* Transplant surgery * Ventricular assist device implantation other than intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation * Pulmonary endarterectomy * Thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair * Inhalational pulmonary vasodilators (e.g. Epoprostenol) administration before insertion of pulmonary artery catheter * Vasopressin is started as the first choice of pressor per clinical staff discretion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mPAP-to-MAP Ratioduring 20 minute period after chest closureThe intraoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure(mPAP) adjusted for systemic mean arterial pressure(MAP), using a time-weighted average mPAP-to-MAP ratio measured during 20 minute period after chest closure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RV Free Wall Strainduring 20 minutes period after chest closureRight Ventricular Free Wall Longitudinal Strain (RV FWLS) is a measure of the deformation (strain) of the right ventricle's free wall (the part not attached to the septum) during contraction. It quantifies how much the myocardium in the free wall of the right ventricle shortens along its longitudinal axis (base to apex) during systole (contraction). It is expressed as a negative percentage (%), where more negative values indicate better contractility (e.g., -20% is better than -10%). In this study, it was measured by transesophageal echocardiography in the 2D mid-esophageal four-chamber view during a steady state period after chest closure

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMariya Geube, MD

The Cleveland Clinic

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This is a unblinded alternating trial. The treatment will be randomized in one week blocks and not by patient, using the RedCap system. This means that during any week, eligible patients will be exposed to the same vasopressor agent (vasopressin or norepinephrine). And the following week there will be new randomization in place. Allocations will be directly communicated to anesthesia personnel and by signs prominently displayed in anesthesia ready room.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Patients Using Intraoperative Vasopressin
Hemodynamic effect of vasopressin on the pulmonary circulation in cardiac surgery patients
70
Patients Using Intraoperative Norepinephrine
Hemodynamic effect of Norepinephrine on the pulmonary circulation in cardiac surgery patients
83
Total153

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPatients Using Intraoperative VasopressinTotalPatients Using Intraoperative Norepinephrine
Age, Continuous66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
BMI29 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
28.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
28.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Comorbid conditions
Cerebral vascular disease
12 Participants36 Participants24 Participants
Comorbid conditions
Chronic kidney disease
2 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Comorbid conditions
Congestive heart failure
30 Participants69 Participants39 Participants
Comorbid conditions
Coronary artery disease
49 Participants110 Participants61 Participants
Comorbid conditions
Diabetes
21 Participants50 Participants29 Participants
Comorbid conditions
Hyperlipidemia
42 Participants93 Participants51 Participants
Comorbid conditions
Hypertension
53 Participants119 Participants66 Participants
Comorbid conditions
Peripheral artery disease
9 Participants26 Participants17 Participants
Comorbid conditions
Pulmonary hypertension
19 Participants40 Participants21 Participants
Comorbid conditions
Smoking history
34 Participants77 Participants43 Participants
Preoperative RV dysfunction
Mild
14 Participants28 Participants14 Participants
Preoperative RV dysfunction
Moderate or severe
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Preoperative RV dysfunction
Normal
50 Participants113 Participants63 Participants
Primary or repeat surgery
Primary surgery
38 Participants88 Participants50 Participants
Primary or repeat surgery
Reoperative surgery
32 Participants65 Participants33 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
70 Participants153 Participants83 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants50 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants103 Participants51 Participants
Surgery type
Aortic surgery
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Surgery type
Aortic valve surgery
13 Participants21 Participants8 Participants
Surgery type
CABG + aortic valve surgery
9 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Surgery type
CABG + mitral valve surgery
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Surgery type
Isolated CABG
10 Participants25 Participants15 Participants
Surgery type
Mitral valve surgery
4 Participants12 Participants8 Participants
Surgery type
Multi-valve procedures
18 Participants51 Participants33 Participants
Surgery type
Other
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

mPAP-to-MAP Ratio

The intraoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure(mPAP) adjusted for systemic mean arterial pressure(MAP), using a time-weighted average mPAP-to-MAP ratio measured during 20 minute period after chest closure

Time frame: during 20 minute period after chest closure

Population: Not all the patients in the 2 groups with preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension, we only included the eligible patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
The Use of VasopressinmPAP-to-MAP RatiomPAP-to-MAP ratio0.394 ratio of mPAP-to-MAPStandard Deviation 0.086
The Use of VasopressinmPAP-to-MAP RatiomPAP-to-MAP ratio with preop pulmonary hypertension0.42 ratio of mPAP-to-MAPStandard Deviation 0.082
The Use of VasopressinmPAP-to-MAP RatiomPAP-to-MAP ratio without preop pulmonary hypertension0.37 ratio of mPAP-to-MAPStandard Deviation 0.084
The Use of NorepinephrinemPAP-to-MAP RatiomPAP-to-MAP ratio0.385 ratio of mPAP-to-MAPStandard Deviation 0.094
The Use of NorepinephrinemPAP-to-MAP RatiomPAP-to-MAP ratio with preop pulmonary hypertension0.40 ratio of mPAP-to-MAPStandard Deviation 0.093
The Use of NorepinephrinemPAP-to-MAP RatiomPAP-to-MAP ratio without preop pulmonary hypertension0.36 ratio of mPAP-to-MAPStandard Deviation 0.092
p-value: 0.5395% CI: [-0.043, 0.022]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: mPAP-to-MAP ratio was compared between patients with pre-existing pulmonary hypertension of use of vasopressin and norepinephrine. Preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension was defined by using the cut-off value of 25 mmHg for the time-weighted average mPAP, i.e., time weighted average mPAP \< 25 mmHg indicated absence of preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension; otherwise, presence of preoperative pulmonary hypertension.p-value: 0.2695% CI: [-0.061, 0.016]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: mPAP-to-MAP ratio was compared between patients without pre-existing pulmonary hypertension of use of vasopressin and norepinephrine. Preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension was defined by using the cut-off value of 25 mmHg for the time-weighted average mPAP, i.e., time weighted average mPAP \< 25 mmHg indicated absence of preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension; otherwise, presence of preoperative pulmonary hypertension.p-value: 0.8895% CI: [-0.05, 0.043]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

RV Free Wall Strain

Right Ventricular Free Wall Longitudinal Strain (RV FWLS) is a measure of the deformation (strain) of the right ventricle's free wall (the part not attached to the septum) during contraction. It quantifies how much the myocardium in the free wall of the right ventricle shortens along its longitudinal axis (base to apex) during systole (contraction). It is expressed as a negative percentage (%), where more negative values indicate better contractility (e.g., -20% is better than -10%). In this study, it was measured by transesophageal echocardiography in the 2D mid-esophageal four-chamber view during a steady state period after chest closure

Time frame: during 20 minutes period after chest closure

Population: Included all patients for RV free wall strain. As not all the patients with/without preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension, so the study pop in subgroup are different.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
The Use of VasopressinRV Free Wall StrainRV free wall strain-18.2 percentage of RV free wall strainStandard Deviation 8.4
The Use of VasopressinRV Free Wall StrainRV free wall strain with preop pulmonary hypertension-17.5 percentage of RV free wall strainStandard Deviation 8.4
The Use of VasopressinRV Free Wall StrainRV free wall strain without preop pulmonary hypertension-19.2 percentage of RV free wall strainStandard Deviation 8.4
The Use of NorepinephrineRV Free Wall StrainRV free wall strain-19.4 percentage of RV free wall strainStandard Deviation 7.2
The Use of NorepinephrineRV Free Wall StrainRV free wall strain with preop pulmonary hypertension-18.9 percentage of RV free wall strainStandard Deviation 8.1
The Use of NorepinephrineRV Free Wall StrainRV free wall strain without preop pulmonary hypertension-20.0 percentage of RV free wall strainStandard Deviation 5.7
p-value: 0.3795% CI: [-6, 2.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: RV free wall strain compare between patients with pre-existing pulmonary hypertension of use of vasopressin and norepinephrine. Preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension was defined by using the cut-off value of 25 mmHg for the time-weighted average mPAP, i.e., time weighted average mPAP \< 25 mmHg indicated absence of preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension; otherwise, presence of preoperative pulmonary hypertension;p-value: 0.3995% CI: [-7.1, 2.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We examined the effect of norepinephrine versus vasopressin on right ventricular free wall strain by separately considering patients who did not have preoperative pulmonary hypertension.~Preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension was defined by using the cut-off value of 25 mmHg for the time-weighted average mPAP, i.e., time weighted average mPAP \< 25 mmHg indicated absence of preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension; otherwise, presence of preoperative pulmonary hypertension.p-value: 0.6395% CI: [-7.6, 4.6]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026