Skip to content

Bilateral Essential Tremor Treatment With FUS

Bilateral Essential Tremor Treatment With Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04501484
Acronym
BEST-FUS
Enrollment
19
Registered
2020-08-06
Start date
2020-07-08
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor

Keywords

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation

Brief summary

Combined Phase II/III, multi-center, prospective, single-blinded trial. Ten (10) patients with who previously underwent successful and uncomplicated MRgFUS thalamotomy for essential tremor will undergo a contralateral treatment. The incidence of side effects will be determined at 1 and 3 months postoperatively, graded per the CTCAE v5 and analyzed by a data safety monitoring board. Upon successful review, this Phase II trial will be converted to a Phase III trial of utility that will enrol 40 additional patients. The primary outcome will be the change in QUEST score at 12 months postoperatively, as well as a patient-reported assessment of Health Utility. Secondary outcomes will include objective tremor, gait and speech assessments (filmed and scored by blinded evaluators), as well as quality of life questionnaires and adverse events questionnaires. Outcomes will be assessed immediately after the procedure, as well as 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months post-operatively.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMagnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound VIM Thalamotomy

Ablation of contralateral VIM nucleus of thalamus with MRgFUS using ExAblate Neuro 4000 Device (InSightec Ltd, Tirat Carmel, Israel)

Sponsors

Université de Sherbrooke
CollaboratorOTHER
University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

All assessments filmed on video and scored by a blinded evaluator.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must be ≥ 18 years * The patient has a primary diagnosis of ET or ET plus confirmed by a movement disorder neurologist; * The patient previously underwent a MRgFUS (\> 6 months ago); * The tremor on the untreated side negatively impacts the patients' quality of life; * The patient wants treatment of the contralateral side.

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically relevant gait and/or balance impairment (e.g. wide-based, more than 2 falls/months, wheelchair, walker, cane use) * Clinically relevant speech impairment (e.g. impairment of intelligibility) * Inability to comply with the follow-up schedule; * Refusal of the treating physician.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in QUEST Score12 monthsDifference in QUEST score between baseline and the 12-month follow-up, with statistical significance defined as p = 0.05 and a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) defined as 5
Patient-based Assessment of Utility12 monthsA patient-reported assessment of utility after 12 months using the question Knowing what you know now, would you do this treatment again?.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait Assessment (missteps)Immediately after surgery, post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Number of missteps in a 6 m standardized tandem walk
FallsPost operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Number of falls in last month
Speech Assessment (NRS-11)Immediately after surgery, post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Patient-reported and blinded observer rating of the patient's ability to speak (Numerical rating scale (NRS-11) from 0 to 10, with 10 being best)
NumbnessImmediately after surgery, post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Incidence of new-onset numbness
Health Utility (EQ-5D-5L)Post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Health Utility measured using the EQ-5D-5L and computed using the Canadian preference weights. Values range from 0 to 1, with 1 representing a perfect health.
Other adverse eventsImmediately after surgery, post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Incidence of other adverse events as classified in the CTCAE
Tremor (CRST)Immediately after surgery, post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Assessment of tremor using the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) parts A (0-88) and B (0-36), higher scores correspond to a worse tremor).
Quality of life (QUEST)Post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36QUality of life in ESsential Tremor (QUEST) questionnaire (0-100%, higher scores correspond to a worse quality of life)
Quality of life (CRST part C)Post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Part C of the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (0-32, higher scores correspond to a worse quality of life)
DysgeusiaImmediately after surgery, post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Incidence of taste alterations
Gait Assessment (NRS-11)Immediately after surgery, post operative month 1, 3, 12, 24, 36Patient-reported and blinded observer rating of the patient's ability to walk (Numerical rating scale (NRS-11) from 0 to 10, with 10 being best)

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026