Skip to content

Hyperbaric Versus Normobaric Oxygen Therapy for COVID-19 Patients

Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyperbaric Versus Normobaric Oxygen Therapy for COVID-19 Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04500626
Enrollment
234
Registered
2020-08-05
Start date
2021-04-15
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2021-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Covid19

Keywords

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy

Brief summary

At least 1 in 6 COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital to receive extra oxygen will die of complications. In patients with COVID-19, invasive treatment such as mechanical ventilation (e.g. breathing with a machine) is associated with a 50% increased risk of death. Invasive treatments use a lot of healthcare resources in intensive care units and may lead to further deaths if patients do not have access to care. The investigators aim to improve outcomes for COVID-19 patients by implementing hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). HBOT allows patients to breathe 100% oxygen in a special chamber at a pressure higher than sea level. It is approved by Health Canada for 14 conditions. HBOT is safe when administered by experienced teams. There are two main causes of death in severe COVID-19 respiratory infections: (i) a decreased diffusion of oxygen from the lungs to the blood and (ii) an increased inflammatory response (also called a cytokine storm). HBOT leads to increased oxygen level in blood, has strong anti-inflammatory effects, and may destroy the virus responsible for COVID-19 disease. The initial experience with HBOT and COVID-19 from China, France and the United States is promising in that it prevents further worsening of the condition and need for intensive care. The investigators propose to test the effectiveness of HBOT for COVID-19 patients who are admitted to hospital to receive extra oxygen. Using the most rigorous and innovative research methods, this Canadian-led international study will operate at 5 centers across 3 countries (Canada: Ottawa, Toronto, Edmonton; Switzerland: Geneva; UK: Rugby/London). The investigators anticipate that when treated by HBOT, COVID-19 patients needing extra oxygen to breathe will see significant health improvements as well as a decrease in complications, inflammation in the blood, need for invasive care, death, and cost of care.

Interventions

DRUGOxygen

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy delivered in a monoplace or multi-place chamber. Supervised by a hyperbaric oxygen therapy physician and a chamber operator.

Sponsors

Climate Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or non-pregnant female patients * Age ≥18 years * Confirmed COVID-19 positive by RT-PCR or another validated method * Diagnosed with pneumonia requiring 21%\<FIO2≤100% to maintain saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≥90% * Able and willing to comply with study procedures and follow-up examinations contained within the written consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Patient clinical status felt to be incompatible with HBOT, e.g. respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation * Pregnancy, determined by a serum or urine test * Hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors * Inability to maintain a sitting position during treatment * Inability to effectively understand and communicate with the hyperbaric operator, or to give consent * Inability to spontaneously equalize ears and refusal of myringotomies * Contraindications to HBOT (e.g. pneumothorax)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
7-level COVID Ordinal Outcome ScaleMeasured on Day 77-level scale based on patient's current status and need for oxygenation, also ability to resume normal activities (at higher levels). Range is 1-7. Higher number indicates better clinical outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Days with oxygen supplementationDuration of study (to Day 28)Number of days with oxygen supplementation
Daily oxygen flow values required to obtain saturation values ≥90%,Duration of study (to Day 28)Measured in L/min
ICU admissionDuration of study (to Day 28)Yes/No
ICU length of stayDuration of study (to Day 28)Measured in days, if applicable
Days on invasive mechanical ventilation or high flow oxygenationDuration of study (to Day 28)Number of days on ventilator
Length of hospital stayDuration of study (to Day 28)Measured in days
Sleep qualityDuration of study (to Day 28)Sleep Quality Scale, measured from 0 to 10. Higher number indicates worse sleep quality: 0 = best possible sleep, 10 = worst possible sleep. Capelleri et. al; Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2009: 7:54
FatigueDuration of study (to Day 28)Single-Item Fatigue Report Mark, measured from 1 to 10. Higher number indicates worse fatigue: 1 = not at all, 10 = extremely. van Hooff et al; J Occup Health 2007; 49:224-234.
7-level COVID Ordinal Outcome ScaleMeasured on Day 28Same scale as the primary outcome; different timing as a secondary outcome. Range is 1-7. Higher number indicates better clinical outcome.
MortalityDuration of study (to Day 28)Number of deaths
Incidence of any adverse events related to HBOTDuration of study (to Day 28)Number of adverse events
Major arterial and venous thrombotic eventsDuration of study (to Day 28)e.g. stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactSylvain Boet, MD, PhD
sboet@toh.ca613-737-8899
Backup ContactJoseph Burns, MSc
josburns@ohri.ca613-798-5555

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026