Skip to content

A Randomized Study to Compare a Hydrogel Packing System to Standard Packing During HDR Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer

A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Study of a Hydrogel Packing System Compared to Standard of Care Packing During Image-Guided High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost for Cervical Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04499521
Enrollment
21
Registered
2020-08-05
Start date
2021-03-17
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2025-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Cancer

Keywords

Brachytherapy

Brief summary

In this study, a new, low cost packing system (BrachyGel VHPS) is being tested as a packing option during brachytherapy along with standard options to make sure that it keeps the unrelated organs away from radiation at least as well as the standard options, and to better understand the safety and patient discomfort associated with BrachyGel VHPS and the standard packing options.

Detailed description

As part of vaginal brachytherapy, the organs that do not need to receive radiation (unrelated organs) are moved out of the way of the radiation with a packing system. The usual low cost and available standard of care packing systems to move these unrelated organs out of the way can sometimes be uncomfortable for the patient, may not move all of the unrelated organs all the way out of the radiation's path, and rely on the doctor to place them correctly. If you participate, you will receive 5 fractions of brachytherapy according to standard clinical care. For three of the fractions, a standard packing option will be used and for two of them BrachyGel VHPS will be used. For the first fraction both groups will have the same packing option but participants will be randomized to either have BrachyGel during fractions 2 and 4 or during fractions 3 and 5. You'll be asked to complete a questionnaire after fractions 2-5 to get your feedback on any discomfort you have during or after brachytherapy from the packing system.

Interventions

DEVICEBrachyGel VHPS

Packing system for administering brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients

Sponsors

BrachyFoam, LLC
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Virginia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Both groups will have two fractions of brachytherapy with a standard packing system and two fractions of brachytherapy with BrachyGel VHPS - only the timing will be different between the two groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Biopsy showing cancer of the cervix (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous, neuroendocrine, etc) 2. FIGO IB1 - IVB Staging according to FIGO and TNM guidelines 3. Planning to receive brachytherapy as a part of the definitive treatment for cervical cancer 4. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70 or ECOG status ≤1 5. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 6. Age ≥ 18 years 7. Agreement to adhere to Lifestyle Considerations throughout study duration

Exclusion criteria

1. History of pelvis or abdominal radiation therapy (RT) that is not a part of the definitive treatment plan for the cancer of interest 2. History of total or partial hysterectomy 3. Plan to receive external beam RT (EBRT) alone as the definitive treatment plan for the cancer of interest 4. Known pregnancy or lactation (no pregnancy test required prior to participation) 5. Known contraindications to brachytherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsFractions 2 and 3 about 1 - 2 weeks after starting brachytherapyThe mean difference in bladder and rectum doses between Gauze and BrachyGel for fractions 2 and 3

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse EventsFrom the completion of the 2nd brachytherapy treatment to 1 month after the last brachytherapy treatment (up to 70 days)Frequency and intensity (CTCAE v5 grade) of AEs
Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsFractions 2 and 5 about 1 - 4 weeks after starting brachytherapyThe mean difference in bladder and rectum doses between Gauze and BrachyGel for fractions 2 through 5.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited based on physician referral at one academic medical center between March 2021 and September 2022. Participants were randomized with equal allocation to each ordering (Arm A or Arm B) using a stratified block randomization scheme with varying block sizes (of 2-4). Randomization occurred prior to the 2nd fraction of brachytherapy.

Pre-assignment details

Fraction 1 for all participants (both Arms) was performed with standard of care packing. One patient of the 21 patients enrolled and randomized did not receive brachytherapy due to disease progression.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A: BrachyGel in Fractions 3 and 5
BrachyGel VHPS in fractions 3 and 5 and standard packing in fractions 2 and 4 BrachyGel VHPS: Packing system for administering brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients
10
Arm B: BrachyGel in Fractions 2 and 4
BrachyGel VHPS in fractions 2 and 4 and standard packing in fractions 3 and 5 BrachyGel VHPS: Packing system for administering brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients
10
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDisease Progression10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm B: BrachyGel in Fractions 2 and 4TotalArm A: BrachyGel in Fractions 3 and 5
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous51 years51.95 years52.9 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants17 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants20 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 102 / 105 / 105 / 103 / 106 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARs

The mean difference in bladder and rectum doses between Gauze and BrachyGel for fractions 2 and 3

Time frame: Fractions 2 and 3 about 1 - 2 weeks after starting brachytherapy

Population: 19 participants were evaluated. A major protocol deviation that occurred for one ARM B subject during fraction (Fx) 2 of brachytherapy (use of an incorrect packing method). This subject is not included in the analysis of this endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc3.071 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.386
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc3.745 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.774
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.518 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.313
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.436 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.684
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc4.117 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.713
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.457 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.035
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.417 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.492
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc4.34 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.681
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc3.26 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.357
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.638 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.901
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc3.601 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.586
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.591 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.405
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.319 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.586
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.311 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.78
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.51 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.789
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.636 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.772
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD905.917 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.893
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc4.381 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.06
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc4.026 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.845
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc3.211 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.693
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.911 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.018
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.575 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.869
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc3.03 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.722
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc3.908 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.828
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.316 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.812
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.705 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.916
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc4.028 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.134
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.573 Mean in Dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.791
Comparison: Mean difference between Gauze and Gel ARM A Bladder D2cc95% CI: [-0.27, 0.5]
Comparison: Mean difference between Gauze and Gel ARM B Bladder D2cc95% CI: [-0.94, 0.96]
Comparison: Mean difference between Gauze and Gel ARM A Rectum D2cc95% CI: [-0.54, 0.16]
Comparison: Mean difference between Gauze and Gel ARM B Rectum D2cc95% CI: [-0.67, 0.29]
Secondary

Adverse Events

Frequency and intensity (CTCAE v5 grade) of AEs

Time frame: From the completion of the 2nd brachytherapy treatment to 1 month after the last brachytherapy treatment (up to 70 days)

Population: All participants who received at least Brachytherapy Fraction 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal pain Grade 22 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal pain Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsInfection (Scabies)* Grade 30 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal hemorrhage (Spotting) Grade 11 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal dryness (itching) Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal inflammation Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal inflammation Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsDysuria Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsDysuria Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsUrinary urgency Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsPelvic Pain Grade 30 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsPelvic pain (abdominal cramping) Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsPelvic pain (abdominal cramping) Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsFatigue Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsFatigue Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsDiarrhea Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsConstipation Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsDyspareunia Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsDermatitis Radiation Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsDizziness Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsNausea Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsVomiting Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsCough Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsBloating Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsBone Pain Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsFacial Pain Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsUTI Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal Infection Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsBloating Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsVaginal pain Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsFatigue Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsCough Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsDizziness Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsInfection (Scabies)* Grade 30 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsVaginal Infection Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsDiarrhea Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsPelvic pain (abdominal cramping) Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsVaginal pain Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsPelvic pain (abdominal cramping) Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsPelvic Pain Grade 30 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsVaginal hemorrhage (Spotting) Grade 11 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsConstipation Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsFacial Pain Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsVaginal dryness (itching) Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsUTI Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsNausea Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsVaginal inflammation Grade 11 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsBone Pain Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsDyspareunia Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsVaginal inflammation Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsFatigue Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsUrinary urgency Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsDysuria Grade 10 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsDermatitis Radiation Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsVomiting Grade 20 Occurences
ARM A Fraction 3Adverse EventsDysuria Grade 20 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsNausea Grade 21 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsVomiting Grade 21 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsUrinary urgency Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsPelvic Pain Grade 31 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsCough Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsPelvic pain (abdominal cramping) Grade 13 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsFatigue Grade 21 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsFatigue Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsBloating Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsDiarrhea Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsUTI Grade 21 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsConstipation Grade 12 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsDyspareunia Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsBone Pain Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsDermatitis Radiation Grade 22 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal pain Grade 22 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal Infection Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsInfection (Scabies)* Grade 31 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsPelvic pain (abdominal cramping) Grade 22 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal pain Grade 13 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsDizziness Grade 21 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal hemorrhage (Spotting) Grade 12 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal dryness (itching) Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal inflammation Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsDysuria Grade 21 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsVaginal inflammation Grade 21 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsFacial Pain Grade 11 Occurences
ARM B Fraction 2Adverse EventsDysuria Grade 11 Occurences
Secondary

Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARs

The mean difference in bladder and rectum doses between Gauze and BrachyGel for fractions 2 through 5.

Time frame: Fractions 2 and 5 about 1 - 4 weeks after starting brachytherapy

Population: A major protocol deviation that occurred for one ARM B subject during fraction (Fx) 2 of brachytherapy (use of an incorrect packing method). Two subjects one from ARM A and one from ARM B only received 4 fractions of treatment. These subjects are not included in the analysis of this endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.417 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.492
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc3.745 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.774
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.518 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.313
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.436 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.684
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc4.117 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.713
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.457 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.035
ARM A Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc3.071 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.386
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc3.26 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.357
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc3.601 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.586
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc4.34 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.681
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.638 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.901
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.591 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.405
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.311 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.78
ARM A Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.319 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.586
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.287 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.058
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc3.035 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.627
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.749 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.501
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc3.611 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.142
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.378 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.664
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.322 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.352
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc4.2 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.795
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.692 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.522
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc4.166 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.873
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc2.936 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.847
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.201 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.919
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.974 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.144
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.798 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.771
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc3.846 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.054
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc3.211 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.693
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc4.381 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.06
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc4.026 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.845
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD905.917 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.893
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.911 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.018
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.636 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.772
ARM B Fraction 2Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.51 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.789
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.575 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.869
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc3.03 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.722
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.316 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.812
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc4.028 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.134
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc3.908 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.828
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.573 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.791
ARM B Fraction 3Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.705 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.916
ARM B Fraction 4Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc2.761 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.664
ARM B Fraction 4Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.015 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.725
ARM B Fraction 4Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc3.453 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.234
ARM B Fraction 4Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.157 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.174
ARM B Fraction 4Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.807 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.262
ARM B Fraction 4Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc3.817 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.068
ARM B Fraction 4Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc4.287 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.518
ARM B Fraction 5Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D0.1cc5.031 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 1.186
ARM B Fraction 5Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D1cc3.236 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.73
ARM B Fraction 5Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D2cc2.993 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.67
ARM B Fraction 5Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D2cc3.649 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.916
ARM B Fraction 5Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsHR-CTVD906.284 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.543
ARM B Fraction 5Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsRectum D0.1cc3.823 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.835
ARM B Fraction 5Dosimetry Comparison of Packing System in OARsBladder D1cc4.072 Mean in dose (Gray)Standard Deviation 0.977

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026