Skip to content

Neural Mobilization and Conventional Physical Therapy After Laminectomy

Effects of Neural Mobilization Augmented by Traditional Physical Therapy on Pain, Functional Disability and H-reflex in Patients After Lumbar Laminectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04498338
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-08-04
Start date
2019-03-31
Completion date
2020-02-27
Last updated
2020-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laminectomy

Brief summary

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of addition of neural mobilization to a standard post-operative physical therapy program in patients with lumbar laminectomy.

Detailed description

After Laminectomy, patients are suffering from many problems as pain, weakness. This study was conducted on two groups of patients who underwent lumbar Laminectomy as a surgical treatment for lumbar canal stenosis. The control group received TENS and strengthening exercises, while the study group received neural mobilization in addition to the program that was given to the control group. The outcome measures include pain intensity, nerve root compression and functional level which were measured pre-treatment and post-treatment through using visual analogue scale, H-reflex latency and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) respectively.

Interventions

OTHERNeural mobilization combined with conventional physical therapy program

Neural mobilization of sciatic nerve combined with TENs and exercise program applied 3 times/week for successive 6 weeks.

OTHERConventional physical therapy program

TENs and exercise program applied 3 times/week for successive 6 weeks.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged from 35-50 years. * Underwent lumbar laminectomy of one or two levels.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who had arthritis in the joints of the lower limbs (which would limit walking). * Patients who had tumors, fractures or infections of the spine. * Patients who had diabetes mellitus. * Patients who had polyneuropathy. * Patients who had evidence of spinal cord compression. * Patients who had previous spinal surgery. * Patients who had spinal stability problems (e.g. spondilo-listhesis, spondilolysis). * Patients who had sensory loss.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityUp to 6 weeksIt was evaluated through visual analogue scale (VAS). Visual analogue scale (VAS) is a 10-cm line with a 0 at the left end for no pain and 10 at the right end for worst possible pain, each patient was asked to indicate on the line where his pain is in relation to the two extremes by circling the number.
Nerve root compressionUp to 6 weeksIt was assessed through assessment of latency of H-reflex of S1. The participant was in prone-lying position. The active recording electrode was located on the soleus between the two heads of the gastrocnemius, while reference recording electrode was located on the Achilles tendon. The stimulation was applied at the midline in the popliteal fossa on the tibial nerve.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional abilityUp to 6 weeksThe functional ability was evaluated by Oswestery disability index (ODI). Oswestery disability index (ODI) is a valid and reliable tool for assessment of functional ability. The minimum value of this scale is 0. The maximum value of this scale is 100. The higher scores mean worse outcome.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026