Skip to content

Safety and Feasibility of Amniotic Fluid as a Treatment for COVID-19 Patients

A Phase I/II Randomized Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Determine Safety and Feasibility of Using an Acellular Sterile Filtered Amniotic Fluid as a Treatment for COVID-19 Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04497389
Enrollment
47
Registered
2020-08-04
Start date
2020-10-28
Completion date
2023-02-15
Last updated
2023-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

SARS CoV-2

Keywords

Amniotic fluid, COVID-19

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of processed human amniotic fluid as a treatment for COVID-19.

Detailed description

Past use of human amniotic products (i.e., membrane and fluid) has previously been FDA-approved as a human cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/P) under 21 CFR 1271 for tissue injury; and has been used to reduce inflammation and fibrosis in patients with a variety of ailments. Given this, the investigators hypothesize that intravenously (IV) administered processed sterile filtered amniotic fluid will reduce inflammation in COVID-19 patients, and improve secondary clinical outcomes. Specifically, the investigators hypothesize that patients who receive IV administered hAF will see a 50% reduction in mean C-reactive protein levels following treatment. Data sharing: Trial results will be published in peer reviewed publications upon completion of analysis.

Interventions

Patients will receive 10ml intravenous hAF each day for 5 consecutive days.

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>18 2. SARS CoV-2 laboratory positive test, obtained within 14 days of enrollment 3. Hospitalized 4. COVID-19 symptomatic (cough, fevers, shortness of breath, and/or sputum production) 5. Has a room air pulse oximetry of ≤94% and requires supplemental oxygen therapy 6. Patients of childbearing potential who agree to use acceptable methods of contraception for 90 days after last administration of study investigational product (IP) 7. Patients who are receiving standard of care therapies for COVID-19 that are not FDA approved are eligible for this study 8. Subjects must be able to consent to the study (i.e., Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≥14) 9. Patients are required to have controlled blood pressure of \<160/96 and a pulse of \<110.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (e.g., endotracheal intubation) 2. Chronic home oxygen utilization 3. Home or current use of immunosuppressive medications (including steroids) 4. Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or become pregnant during the study 5. Patients on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation 6. Patients on \>12 liters per minute via non-rebreather (NRB) or \>80% oxygen via high flow nasal cannula 7. Patients who, in the opinion of the PI, have impending respiratory failure, defined as requiring rapidly escalating oxygen supplementation 8. Patients with a hemoglobin \<9 mg/dL 9. Patients diagnosed with Stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) 10. Patients with diagnosed New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 4 or 5 congestive heart failure 11. Patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) 12. Patients with thromboembolic phenomena 13. Patients with Type 2 and above heart block 14. Patients with established positive bacterial blood cultures prior to enrollment 15. Patients with ongoing pericardial effusion or ascites 16. Patients with clinically significant arrhythmia 17. Patients with liver function tests (ALT or AST) \>3x normal 18. Patients with untreated HIV infection 19. Patients diagnosed with end-stage organ disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
C-reactive ProteinBaseline through post-treatment (6 days)Assess reduction of inflammation in COVID-19 patients, potentially leading to a decrease in the need for critical care. This will be assessed by measurement of C-reactive protein levels before and after the intervention. Units: mg/dL

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Any ICU AdmissionBaseline through 30 daysComparison of ICU admissions between intervention and control groups
Hospital Length of StayFrom date of hospital admission through date of discharge or death, whichever comes first (up to 100 days)Comparison of days spent in hospital between intervention and control groups
Need for Invasive Mechanical VentilationFrom date of enrollment through date of discharge or death, whichever comes first (up to 100 days)Comparison of mechanical ventilation incidence between intervention and control groups
Biomarker Levels (Interleukin-6)Baseline through post-treatment (6 days)Comparison of mean biomarker level change between intervention and control groups. Units: pg/mL
Biomarker Levels (D-dimer)Baseline through post-treatment (6 days)Comparison of mean biomarker level change between intervention and control groups. Units: mg/mL
Biomarker Levels (Lactate Dehydrogenase)Baseline through post-treatment (6 days)Comparison of mean biomarker level change between intervention and control groups. Units: u/L
Death Within 30 DaysBaseline through 30 daysComparison of mortality between intervention and control groups
Major Adverse Cardiac EventsFrom date of enrollment through date of discharge or death, whichever comes first (up to 100 days)Compare frequency of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between intervention and control groups
Patient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month1 month post-dischargeComparison of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire results on a computer-adaptive platform between intervention and control groups using T-scores. Scale mean = 50, standard deviation = 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measured (i.e., physical function = a higher score indicates better outcomes; dyspnea severity, sleep disturbance, anxiety = a higher score indicates worse outcomes). Sleep Disturbance, Dyspnea Severity, Anxiety Less than 55 = None to slight/Within normal limits 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe Physical Function 55 and over = Within normal limits 54.9-40 = Mild limitations 39.9-30 = Moderate limitations 29.9 and below = Severe limitations
Patient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months3 months post-dischargeComparison of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire results on a computer-adaptive platform between intervention and control groups using T-scores. Scale mean = 50, standard deviation = 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measured (i.e., physical function = a higher score indicates better outcomes; dyspnea severity, sleep disturbance, anxiety = a higher score indicates worse outcomes). Sleep Disturbance, Dyspnea Severity, Anxiety Less than 55 = None to slight/Within normal limits 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe Physical Function 55 and over = Within normal limits 54.9-40 = Mild limitations 39.9-30 = Moderate limitations 29.9 and below = Severe limitations
Patient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months6 months post-dischargeComparison of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire results on a computer-adaptive platform between intervention and control groups using T-scores. Scale mean = 50, standard deviation = 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measured (i.e., physical function = a higher score indicates better outcomes; dyspnea severity, sleep disturbance, anxiety = a higher score indicates worse outcomes). Sleep Disturbance, Dyspnea Severity, Anxiety Less than 55 = None to slight/Within normal limits 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe Physical Function 55 and over = Within normal limits 54.9-40 = Mild limitations 39.9-30 = Moderate limitations 29.9 and below = Severe limitations
Patient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months12 months post-dischargeComparison of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire results on a computer-adaptive platform between intervention and control groups using T-scores. Scale mean = 50, standard deviation = 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measured (i.e., physical function = a higher score indicates better outcomes; dyspnea severity, sleep disturbance, anxiety = a higher score indicates worse outcomes). Sleep Disturbance, Dyspnea Severity, Anxiety Less than 55 = None to slight/Within normal limits 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe Physical Function 55 and over = Within normal limits 54.9-40 = Mild limitations 39.9-30 = Moderate limitations 29.9 and below = Severe limitations
Need for ECMOFrom date of enrollment through date of discharge or death, whichever comes first (up to 100 days)Comparison of ECMO incidence between intervention and control groups

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
10ml intravenous hAF QD for 5 consecutive days Human Amniotic Fluid: Patients will receive 10ml intravenous hAF each day for 5 consecutive days.
23
Standard of Care
10 mL normal saline QD for 5 days
24
Total47

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionStandard of CareTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants16 Participants33 Participants
Age, Continuous56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.09
58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants19 Participants40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants19 Participants34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 Participants24 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 230 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 2311 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 232 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

C-reactive Protein

Assess reduction of inflammation in COVID-19 patients, potentially leading to a decrease in the need for critical care. This will be assessed by measurement of C-reactive protein levels before and after the intervention. Units: mg/dL

Time frame: Baseline through post-treatment (6 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionC-reactive Protein-3.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.58
Standard of CareC-reactive Protein-5.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.42
Other Pre-specified

Any ICU Admission

Comparison of ICU admissions between intervention and control groups

Time frame: Baseline through 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionAny ICU Admission8 Participants
Standard of CareAny ICU Admission4 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Biomarker Levels (D-dimer)

Comparison of mean biomarker level change between intervention and control groups. Units: mg/mL

Time frame: Baseline through post-treatment (6 days)

Population: Data is missing for patients who did not have Day 6 labs drawn.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionBiomarker Levels (D-dimer)-0.3 mg/mLStandard Deviation 1.77
Standard of CareBiomarker Levels (D-dimer)1.8 mg/mLStandard Deviation 11.8
Other Pre-specified

Biomarker Levels (Interleukin-6)

Comparison of mean biomarker level change between intervention and control groups. Units: pg/mL

Time frame: Baseline through post-treatment (6 days)

Population: Data is missing for patients who did not have Day 6 labs drawn.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionBiomarker Levels (Interleukin-6)9.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 24.11
Standard of CareBiomarker Levels (Interleukin-6)32 pg/mLStandard Deviation 107.77
Other Pre-specified

Biomarker Levels (Lactate Dehydrogenase)

Comparison of mean biomarker level change between intervention and control groups. Units: u/L

Time frame: Baseline through post-treatment (6 days)

Population: Data is missing for patients who did not have Day 6 labs drawn.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionBiomarker Levels (Lactate Dehydrogenase)-87.3 U/LStandard Deviation 124.8
Standard of CareBiomarker Levels (Lactate Dehydrogenase)-54.4 U/LStandard Deviation 80.8
Other Pre-specified

Death Within 30 Days

Comparison of mortality between intervention and control groups

Time frame: Baseline through 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionDeath Within 30 Days2 Participants
Standard of CareDeath Within 30 Days0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Hospital Length of Stay

Comparison of days spent in hospital between intervention and control groups

Time frame: From date of hospital admission through date of discharge or death, whichever comes first (up to 100 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionHospital Length of Stay7.4 daysStandard Deviation 6.69
Standard of CareHospital Length of Stay7 daysStandard Deviation 6.04
Other Pre-specified

Major Adverse Cardiac Events

Compare frequency of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between intervention and control groups

Time frame: From date of enrollment through date of discharge or death, whichever comes first (up to 100 days)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionMajor Adverse Cardiac Events1 Participants
Standard of CareMajor Adverse Cardiac Events0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Need for ECMO

Comparison of ECMO incidence between intervention and control groups

Time frame: From date of enrollment through date of discharge or death, whichever comes first (up to 100 days)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNeed for ECMO0 Participants
Standard of CareNeed for ECMO0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Comparison of mechanical ventilation incidence between intervention and control groups

Time frame: From date of enrollment through date of discharge or death, whichever comes first (up to 100 days)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNeed for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation4 Participants
Standard of CareNeed for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Patient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months

Comparison of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire results on a computer-adaptive platform between intervention and control groups using T-scores. Scale mean = 50, standard deviation = 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measured (i.e., physical function = a higher score indicates better outcomes; dyspnea severity, sleep disturbance, anxiety = a higher score indicates worse outcomes). Sleep Disturbance, Dyspnea Severity, Anxiety Less than 55 = None to slight/Within normal limits 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe Physical Function 55 and over = Within normal limits 54.9-40 = Mild limitations 39.9-30 = Moderate limitations 29.9 and below = Severe limitations

Time frame: 12 months post-discharge

Population: Data missing from patients who did not complete Month 12 surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months51.8 t-scoreStandard Deviation 9.66
Standard of CarePatient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months42.9 t-scoreStandard Deviation 10.9
Month 1 PROMIS Dyspnea Severity: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months31.8 t-scoreStandard Deviation 8.62
Month 1 PROMIS Dyspnea Severity: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months41.6 t-scoreStandard Deviation 12.3
Month 1 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months47.1 t-scoreStandard Deviation 12.6
Month 1 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months49.9 t-scoreStandard Deviation 7.64
Month 1 PROMIS Anxiety: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months42.3 t-scoreStandard Deviation 5.73
Month 1 PROMIS Anxiety: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 12 Months47.4 t-scoreStandard Deviation 9.38
Other Pre-specified

Patient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month

Comparison of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire results on a computer-adaptive platform between intervention and control groups using T-scores. Scale mean = 50, standard deviation = 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measured (i.e., physical function = a higher score indicates better outcomes; dyspnea severity, sleep disturbance, anxiety = a higher score indicates worse outcomes). Sleep Disturbance, Dyspnea Severity, Anxiety Less than 55 = None to slight/Within normal limits 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe Physical Function 55 and over = Within normal limits 54.9-40 = Mild limitations 39.9-30 = Moderate limitations 29.9 and below = Severe limitations

Time frame: 1 month post-discharge

Population: Data is missing for patients who did not complete Month 1 surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month39.8 t-scoreStandard Deviation 8.54
Standard of CarePatient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month41.5 t-scoreStandard Deviation 9.1
Month 1 PROMIS Dyspnea Severity: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month41.6 t-scoreStandard Deviation 9.36
Month 1 PROMIS Dyspnea Severity: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month43.0 t-scoreStandard Deviation 9.71
Month 1 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month47.8 t-scoreStandard Deviation 9.81
Month 1 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month52.2 t-scoreStandard Deviation 4.98
Month 1 PROMIS Anxiety: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month47.0 t-scoreStandard Deviation 9.18
Month 1 PROMIS Anxiety: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 1 Month51.1 t-scoreStandard Deviation 47
Other Pre-specified

Patient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months

Comparison of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire results on a computer-adaptive platform between intervention and control groups using T-scores. Scale mean = 50, standard deviation = 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measured (i.e., physical function = a higher score indicates better outcomes; dyspnea severity, sleep disturbance, anxiety = a higher score indicates worse outcomes). Sleep Disturbance, Dyspnea Severity, Anxiety Less than 55 = None to slight/Within normal limits 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe Physical Function 55 and over = Within normal limits 54.9-40 = Mild limitations 39.9-30 = Moderate limitations 29.9 and below = Severe limitations

Time frame: 3 months post-discharge

Population: Data is missing for patients who did not complete Month 3 surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months42.9 t-scoreStandard Deviation 7.3
Standard of CarePatient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months43.9 t-scoreStandard Deviation 10.4
Month 1 PROMIS Dyspnea Severity: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months37.2 t-scoreStandard Deviation 10.3
Month 1 PROMIS Dyspnea Severity: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months41.5 t-scoreStandard Deviation 14.8
Month 1 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months45.4 t-scoreStandard Deviation 10.8
Month 1 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months50.5 t-scoreStandard Deviation 8.55
Month 1 PROMIS Anxiety: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months43.6 t-scoreStandard Deviation 6.87
Month 1 PROMIS Anxiety: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 3 Months50.9 t-scoreStandard Deviation 7.84
Other Pre-specified

Patient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months

Comparison of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire results on a computer-adaptive platform between intervention and control groups using T-scores. Scale mean = 50, standard deviation = 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measured (i.e., physical function = a higher score indicates better outcomes; dyspnea severity, sleep disturbance, anxiety = a higher score indicates worse outcomes). Sleep Disturbance, Dyspnea Severity, Anxiety Less than 55 = None to slight/Within normal limits 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe Physical Function 55 and over = Within normal limits 54.9-40 = Mild limitations 39.9-30 = Moderate limitations 29.9 and below = Severe limitations

Time frame: 6 months post-discharge

Population: Data is missing for patients who did not complete Month 6 surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months45.0 t-scoreStandard Deviation 6.3
Standard of CarePatient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months44.3 t-scoreStandard Deviation 11.6
Month 1 PROMIS Dyspnea Severity: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months37.6 t-scoreStandard Deviation 9.21
Month 1 PROMIS Dyspnea Severity: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months37.2 t-scoreStandard Deviation 10.8
Month 1 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months48.0 t-scoreStandard Deviation 10.2
Month 1 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months47.1 t-scoreStandard Deviation 6.84
Month 1 PROMIS Anxiety: InterventionPatient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months39.4 t-scoreStandard Deviation 3.23
Month 1 PROMIS Anxiety: ControlPatient-reported Functional Status at 6 Months51.7 t-scoreStandard Deviation 8.46

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026