Reducing Acute Severe Respiratory Events in Health Care Workers During the Covid-19 Pandemic With OM85

Covid19, Respiratory Viral Infection

Parallel group, Wait-list design, with treatment delayed for 3 months. Participants will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio with 500 participants per group in Australia. Group 1: Wait-list control. One capsule OM85 (7.0 mg) will be given daily for 3 months, commencing in Month 3, with 3 months follow-up off treatment. Group 2: Initial treatment. One capsule OM85 (7.0 mg) will be given daily for 3 months, commencing on day 0, with 3 months follow-up off treatment.

The Covid-19 pandemic has been characterised by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) accompanied by a systemic cytokine-storm resulting in severe illness, respiratory failure and death in some. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)- Coronavirus (Cov-2) (COV) infection per se is not the only underlying issue here, as it is becoming evident that ARDS is relatively rare amongst infected subjects, and appears to be associated with gross dysregulation of ensuing host-anti-viral responses resulting in collateral immune-inflammatory-mediated damage to host tissues. Rather than waiting for susceptible subjects to present with COV-associated ARDS, the investigators propose treatment of healthy health care workers (HCW) with a therapeutic agent which simultaneously targets front-line innate anti-viral immune defences, together with the core mechanism that controls immune response intensity in the airways. This research addresses the hypothesis that resistance to development of severe COV-associated respiratory disease in front-line HCW, even in those who develop a primary infection, can be boosted via a regimen of daily dosing with the bacterial-derived immunomodulatory agent OM85. Aims 1. To demonstrate that daily treatment with OM85 will prevent HCW developing acute respiratory infections (ARI) necessitating removal from the workforce. 2. To elucidate the mechanism of action by which OM85 regulates host immune responses against COV. Mechanistic studies will primarily test the hypothesis that OM85 pre-treatment modulates the systemic immunoinflammatory response to COV, selectively attenuating potentially pathogenic pro-inflammatory pathways without compromising activation of innate immune pathways central to pathogen clearance. The investigators will additionally collect samples to test the secondary hypothesis that the host response to COV displays uniquely aggressive pro-inflammatory features that differ from those observed with non-COV respiratory infections. Experimental design: participants will be randomised into two groups; Immediate treatment with OM85 (n=500) or wait-list control with OM85 commencing three months later (n=500). Venous blood samples will be collected from each subject at four time points. Sera will be stored from each time point for assay of COV-specific antibody. For the mechanistic studies the investigators will focus on two groups of subjects who test respectively positive or negative to COV during a defined respiratory illness. These will be further stratified by treatment (OM85 treated (OM+) versus non-treated (OM-) prior to ARI, yielding 4 sets (each n=50) of test samples collected at acute infection which will be utilized for two discrete cross-comparisons: (i) COV+/OM+ versus COV+/OM-, and (ii) COV-/OM+ versus COV-/OM-. Analyses in (i) will be prioritised as they relate exclusively to host-responses to COV and effects of treatment thereon; those in (ii) which will contrast COV-associated response with those elicited by conventional respiratory pathogens and compare respective susceptibility to OM85.

No related papers found yet.

Australia