Skip to content

Effect of the Cycloergometer in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Effect of the Use of a Cycloergometer on the Physical Performance of Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04496011
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-08-03
Start date
2020-03-02
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2020-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fatigue, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Autologous transplant, Allogeneic transplant, Physiotherapy, Exercise, Fatigue

Brief summary

Physiological changes caused by hematological diseases associated with high dose chemotherapy have a negative impact on patient's functionality, making them more fragile and vulnerable after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Currently, randomized studies have shown that physical exercise can contribute to improve Quality of Life of these patients. In this randomized controlled trial, we will study the effect of using the bicycle ergometer on the physical performance of patients undergoing transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCT).

Detailed description

The sample consists of 30 patients diagnosed with leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cells transplantation, who will be randomized into two groups. The results of muscle strength in the lower limbs, general mobility, fatigue and clinical symptoms will be compared between the control group and the experimental group. The control group will perform an exercise program based on the standard protocol of the physiotherapy service, where exercises are performed to gain strength in muscle groups of the upper and lower limbs, range of motion, balance and functional movements. The experimental group will perform the same exercises as the control group, added to a training program using a bicycle ergometer, with an incremental load (from 60% to 70% of the maximum heart rate) for 20 minutes.

Interventions

OTHERAerobic training with cycle ergometer

Patients start with an initial warm-up of 2 minutes, with rotations per minute free, without load. Progressively, the load of the exercise cycle increases every minute up to the supported limit or up to 60% - 70% of maximum heart rate (HRmax). The training will be carried out for 20 continuous minutes, being interrupted whenever the heart rate (HR) reaches 90% of the maximum expected for the age and / or the loss of effort perceived in the BORG scale, above 8 on a scale of 0 to 10.

Sponsors

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will be included by convenience (according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria) in non-probabilistic form. The included individuals will be randomized by (nome do Sofwate) in two lists: one for the control group and other for the experimental group. Once defined that the patient will be part of the experimental group, a bicycle ergometer will be kept in the patient's accommodation during the period of hospitalization due to restrictions imposed by the Infection Control Department. Thus, the equipment will remain in the patient´s room during the hospitalization, while the other patients will be allocated to the control group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (18-70 years) scheduled to perform the first HSCT; * Be with a preserved neurological function and full cognition; * Have clinical conditions that allow participation in the motor physiotherapy program; * Be agreed with a study proposal and sign the free and informed consent form (ICF).

Exclusion criteria

* Develop clinical complications that contraindicate the performance of motor physiotherapy including the practice of the cycle ergometer; * Present a previous musculoskeletal alteration that interferes with the performance of physical performance assessment tests; * Recent cardiovascular or pulmonary disease; * Psychiatric or neurological disorder; * Need for gait assistance or presence of bone metastasis * Adherence below 50% of the total motor physiotherapy protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lower Limb Physical Functioning and StrengthTrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsThe 30-Second Chair Stand evaluates lower limb strength and, indirectly, the risk of falls, especially in the elderly population (JONES, J., RIKLI, 2002). This way, it will compose the set of tests used to determine the physical performance by measuring the number of stands from an armless chair of standard height (45 cm) performed in 30 seconds. The test will be begin when the participant, seating on a neutral spine position and feet flat on the floor, will be instructed to rise to a full stand and return to the original seated position, as quickly as possible. The participant will be instructed to move at maximal speed until they either feel the need to stop or the 30-second time limit is reached. More than 8 unassisted stands for men and women are considered above average for their age, and those below the range as below average

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FatigueTrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsPiper Fatigue Scale, developed by Piper et al. (1998), is a multidimensional measure of fatigue in the field of cancer research and includes subdomains of the behavioral, affective, sensorial and cognitive attributes / fatigue mood, composed of 22 items. The scores for each item range from 0 to 10 and can total 220 points. Higher values characterize a greater perception of fatigue. It will be applied on patient's evaluation day and on hospital discharge day.
Symptoms AssessmentTrough study completion, an average of 2 monthsThe Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scalemorning will be applied to eavaluate symptoms of pain, tiredness, drowsiness, appetite, nausea, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety and well-being. It is a scale where the patient provides an auto-report on a score that can vary from 0 to 10, being score 0 absence of symptoms and 10 represents the most intense sensation experienced by the patient.
Timed up and Go (TUG)Trough study completion, an average of 2 monthsTUG is used in clinical practice to assess mobility, the risk of falls and also to assist in the diagnosis of sarcopenia. For this reason, that test will be compiled or set of tests that will be used to determine physical performance.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactFabricio Edler Macagnan, PhD
fabriciom@ufcspa.edu.br+55 (51) 3309.8876

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026