Skip to content

Combining Neuro-Imaging and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Clinical Intervention in Opioid Use Disorder

Combining Neuro-Imaging and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Clinical Intervention in Opioid Use Disorder

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04495673
Enrollment
9
Registered
2020-08-03
Start date
2021-01-11
Completion date
2022-02-22
Last updated
2025-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heroin Dependence, Morphine Dependence, Opioid-Related Disorders

Brief summary

The overarching goal of this project is to expand the traditional expertise in non-invasive neuromodulation at the University of Minnesota towards developing novel paired-neuromodulation approaches using transcrancial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for new addiction treatments that support long-term abstinence. This study will investigate whether the pairing of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation and cognitive training can enhance functional connectivity between DLPFC and nucleus accumbens (NAcc). We have identified higher functional connectivity between DLPFC and NAcc in alcoholics that have successfully maintained abstinence for extended periods of time (7 years). This paired-neuromodulation approach can potentially be used as a therapeutic intervention to decrease substance use probability in addiction (e.g. opioid use disorder). The long term goal is to develop new addiction treatments that support long-term abstinence in opioid use disorder. The overall objective of this proposal is to enhance functional connectivity between DLPFC and NAcc as a therapeutic intervention to enhance cognition and reduce substance use rates in opioid use disorder.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Participants receive 10 sessions (2 5-visit blocks of 46 minutes) of active tDCS to DLPFC (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex)

DEVICESham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Participants receive 10 sessions (1 5-visit block of 46 minutes of active tDCS and 1 5-visit block of sham tDCS)

BEHAVIORALCognitive Training

Executive functioning tasks

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Current diagnosis of opioid use disorder * Enrolled in a methadone treatment program for at least 2 months in Hennepin Healthcare and be clinically stable. * Meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) diagnostic criteria for opioid use disorder * Participants may have current comorbid drug use, but their primary substance use disorder diagnosis must to be based on opioid use. * Participants must have the intention to remain in the methadone treatment program until the end of the intervention portion of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Any medical condition or treatment with neurological sequelae (i.e. stroke, tumor, loss of consciousness\>30 min, HIV) * Head injury resulting in a skull fracture or a loss of consciousness exceeding 30 minutes (i.e., moderate or severe TBI) * Any contraindications for tDCS or MRI scanning (tDCS contraindication: actively receiving treatment for seizures or epilepsy; MRI contraindications; metal implants, pacemakers or any other implanted electrical device, injury with metal, braces, dental implants, non-removable body piercings, pregnancy, breathing or moving disorder) * Current active psychosis or mania * Presence of a condition that would render study measures difficult or impossible to administer or interpret (e.g. current mania, active psychosis) * Primary current substance use disorder diagnosis on a substance other than opioid except for caffeine or nicotine * Current stimulant use disorder (need to be free of stimulant use for at least 1 month) * History of electroconvulsive therapy or cortical energy exposure within the past 12 months, including participation in any other neuromodulation studies * incarceration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
(A1) Average Number of Serious Adverse Events in Active and Sham Groups.2months post-interventionSafety was defined as the prevalence of Serious Adverse Events for the study. Subjects were monitored for Serious Adverse Events from date of first intervention session until the final follow-up visit (2 months post-intevention). Subjects were monitored using the Symptom Rating Questionnaire (SRQ), Medication/Medical Update Interview, and medical chart review. Serious Adverse Events were defined as: Death, life threatening incidents, hospitalizations (initial or prolonged), disability or permanent damage, congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an event that required intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage. Mean and standard deviation of Serious Adverse Events was recorded across groups. A lower number indicates fewer Serious Adverse Events.
(A2) Activation Levels in Brain Circuits in Active and Sham Groups.1-week post-interventionBrain activation change from pre-intervention to post-intervention was planned to be compard between active tDCS and sham groups. We hypothesized that the active tDCS group will have a larger increase in brain circuit engagement than the sham group and, thus, a better outcome.
(A3) Changes in Scaled Score on Digit Span Task.2 months post-interventionCognitive performance change was compared between active tDCS and sham groups. Cognitive performance change was defined as improvement on the WAIS-IV Digit Span (DS). Score was calculating by subtracting the DS scaled score at baseline from the DS scaled score at 2-Month Follow Up. We hypothesized that the active tDCS group will have a larger improvement in cognitive performance than the sham group. A higher number indicates a higher impact of cognitive training and, thus, a better outcome. The DS Scaled Score has a range between 1 (min.) and 10 (max). Therefore, the computed difference between two DS Scaled Scores has a range of -9 (min.) to 9 (max.)
(A4) Number of Participants Who Relapsed After Intervention.2 months post-interventionRelapse was defined as any illiciit drug use (whether reported by the patient or reported as a positive drug screen in study or medical records) that occurred at some point between study intervention and the final follow-up visit (2 months post-intervention). Relapse was measured with the Timeline Follow Back questionnaire, saliva drug screen at the study visit, and chart review of urine drug screens. Relapse was coded 0 (did not relapse during the study) or 1 (relapsed during the study). We hypothesized that the active tDCS group will have a lower relapse rate than the sham group. A higher number indicates a higher count of participants with a relapse.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Scaled Score on Digit Symbol Task.2-months post-interventionDurability of cognitive training was defined as improvement on the WAIS-IV Digit Scale Symbol/Coding (CD) test. The improvement period was measured between baseline and the study completion (2 months post-intervention). The score was calculated by subtracting the CD scaled score at baseline from the CD Scaled Score at 2-months post-intervention. A higher number indicates a higher impact on cognitive abilities, and a better outcome. The CD Scaled Score has a range between 1 (min.) and 10 (max). Therefore, the computed difference between two CD Scaled Scores has a range of -9 (min.) to 9 (max.)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
tDCS With Cognitive Training
DLPFC stimulation with tDCS with simultaneous cognitive training Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Participants receive 10 sessions (2 5-visit blocks of 46 minutes) of active tDCS to DLPFC (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) Cognitive Training: Executive functioning tasks
5
Sham tDCS With Cognitive Training
Sham tDCS with simultaneous cognitive training Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Participants receive 10 sessions (1 5-visit block of 46 minutes of active tDCS and 1 5-visit block of sham tDCS) Cognitive Training: Executive functioning tasks
4
Total9

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristictDCS With Cognitive TrainingSham tDCS With Cognitive TrainingTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 51 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

(A1) Average Number of Serious Adverse Events in Active and Sham Groups.

Safety was defined as the prevalence of Serious Adverse Events for the study. Subjects were monitored for Serious Adverse Events from date of first intervention session until the final follow-up visit (2 months post-intevention). Subjects were monitored using the Symptom Rating Questionnaire (SRQ), Medication/Medical Update Interview, and medical chart review. Serious Adverse Events were defined as: Death, life threatening incidents, hospitalizations (initial or prolonged), disability or permanent damage, congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an event that required intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage. Mean and standard deviation of Serious Adverse Events was recorded across groups. A lower number indicates fewer Serious Adverse Events.

Time frame: 2months post-intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS With Cognitive Training(A1) Average Number of Serious Adverse Events in Active and Sham Groups.0 Number of adverse eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sham tDCS With Cognitive Training(A1) Average Number of Serious Adverse Events in Active and Sham Groups.0 Number of adverse eventsStandard Deviation 0
Primary

(A2) Activation Levels in Brain Circuits in Active and Sham Groups.

Brain activation change from pre-intervention to post-intervention was planned to be compard between active tDCS and sham groups. We hypothesized that the active tDCS group will have a larger increase in brain circuit engagement than the sham group and, thus, a better outcome.

Time frame: 1-week post-intervention

Population: Due to extreme motion artifacts preventing data acquisition, we were unable to collect minimum quantity of data necessary for the imaging analysis software to generate descriptive statistics.

Primary

(A3) Changes in Scaled Score on Digit Span Task.

Cognitive performance change was compared between active tDCS and sham groups. Cognitive performance change was defined as improvement on the WAIS-IV Digit Span (DS). Score was calculating by subtracting the DS scaled score at baseline from the DS scaled score at 2-Month Follow Up. We hypothesized that the active tDCS group will have a larger improvement in cognitive performance than the sham group. A higher number indicates a higher impact of cognitive training and, thus, a better outcome. The DS Scaled Score has a range between 1 (min.) and 10 (max). Therefore, the computed difference between two DS Scaled Scores has a range of -9 (min.) to 9 (max.)

Time frame: 2 months post-intervention

Population: Small numbers of subjects due to COVID-19 pandemic, insufficient N for interpreting data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS With Cognitive Training(A3) Changes in Scaled Score on Digit Span Task.-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Sham tDCS With Cognitive Training(A3) Changes in Scaled Score on Digit Span Task.-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Primary

(A4) Number of Participants Who Relapsed After Intervention.

Relapse was defined as any illiciit drug use (whether reported by the patient or reported as a positive drug screen in study or medical records) that occurred at some point between study intervention and the final follow-up visit (2 months post-intervention). Relapse was measured with the Timeline Follow Back questionnaire, saliva drug screen at the study visit, and chart review of urine drug screens. Relapse was coded 0 (did not relapse during the study) or 1 (relapsed during the study). We hypothesized that the active tDCS group will have a lower relapse rate than the sham group. A higher number indicates a higher count of participants with a relapse.

Time frame: 2 months post-intervention

Population: Four participants who were randomized but were lost to follow-up prior to the 2 month follow up were not included in these analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
tDCS With Cognitive Training(A4) Number of Participants Who Relapsed After Intervention.2 Participants
Sham tDCS With Cognitive Training(A4) Number of Participants Who Relapsed After Intervention.0 Participants
Secondary

Changes in Scaled Score on Digit Symbol Task.

Durability of cognitive training was defined as improvement on the WAIS-IV Digit Scale Symbol/Coding (CD) test. The improvement period was measured between baseline and the study completion (2 months post-intervention). The score was calculated by subtracting the CD scaled score at baseline from the CD Scaled Score at 2-months post-intervention. A higher number indicates a higher impact on cognitive abilities, and a better outcome. The CD Scaled Score has a range between 1 (min.) and 10 (max). Therefore, the computed difference between two CD Scaled Scores has a range of -9 (min.) to 9 (max.)

Time frame: 2-months post-intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS With Cognitive TrainingChanges in Scaled Score on Digit Symbol Task.-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Sham tDCS With Cognitive TrainingChanges in Scaled Score on Digit Symbol Task.-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026