Skip to content

Administration of Ropivacaine by Bi-laterosternal Multiperforated Catheters Placed Before a Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery

The Effect of Continuous Administration of Ropivacaine by Bi-laterosternal Multiperforated Catheters Placed Before a Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04495504
Acronym
Pre-BLS-Sterno
Enrollment
32
Registered
2020-08-03
Start date
2020-07-22
Completion date
2021-07-12
Last updated
2026-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age Under 85 Years, Scheduled Cardiac Surgery

Keywords

Postoperative analgesia, Sternotomy, Local anesthetics

Brief summary

The sternotomy site is the most painful site after cardiac surgery. Local infiltration of ropivacaine through the multihole catheters in the bilaterosternal position (BLS) after sternotomy significantly reduces pain at rest and during mobilization, reduces opioids consumption, decreases postoperative complications, improves patient comfort and satisfaction and reduced hospital costs. In this study our hypothesis is to test the efficacity of local anesthetic administration via the catheters in the BLS position placed before the surgical incision.

Detailed description

Goal of the study: Evaluation of the effectiveness of BLS technique on a composite endpoint (pain at rest, pain during patient mobilization and opioid consumption). Open trial, therapeutic, prospective, monocentric. One group of patients who will benefits from the placement of two multihole catheters in BLS position: * The ropivacaine group (40 patients): placement by the surgeon of two catheters in BLS position before the surgical incision. Administration of a bolus dose of 10 ml of ropivacaine 7, 5 mg/mL in each catheter followed by a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml in a rate of 3 mL/h during the first 48 hours postoperatively. * The control group (80 patients) from the two previous studies who underwent standard analgesia with PCA morphine.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine

Administration of a bolus dose of 10 ml of ropivacaine 7, 5 mg/mL in each catheter Continuous infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml in a rate of 3 mL/h during the first 48 hours postoperatively.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Placement by the surgeon of two catheters in BLS position before the surgical incision. Administration of a bolus dose of 10 ml of ropivacaine 7, 5 mg/mL in each catheter followed by a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml in a rate of 3 mL/h during the first 48 hours postoperatively.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who undergo scheduled cardiac surgery with sternotomy: aortic or mitral valve replacement, biological or mechanical, coronary bypass surgery * Age under 85 years * Patients who have given their consent according to the methods described in Title II of the book of the first Public Health Code * Possession of Social Security insurance.

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency surgery * Approach by thoracotomy * Heart transplant * Aortic dissection * Redo surgery. * Pregnant women * Refusal of the protocol * Protected minors or adults * Pre-existing psychiatric pathology including known states of opioid addiction * Long-term opioid medication * Physical or intellectual inability to use a PCA * Severe heart failure (ejection fraction less than 40% or PAH \> 50 mmHg) * Preoperative cardiogenic shock * Severe preoperative chronic or acute renal failure with a creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL / min according to Cockroft's formula * Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or to any component of the catheter * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or analgesia protocol (ropivacaine, paracetamol, opiates).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain evaluationDay 2 postoperatively.The technique is considered as a fail if : pain rest \> 3.5 /10 (0 = no pain; 10 maximum pain) or pain during mobilization \> 3.5/10 (0 = no pain; 10 maximum pain)
Opioid consumptionDay 2 postoperatively.The technique is considered as a fail if morphine consumption \> 35 mg

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ICU length of stayUp to 6 monthsDays of ICU and hospital stay
Hospital length of stayUp to 6 monthsDays of ICU and hospital stay
Patient satisfactionDay 2 postoperatively.Patient satisfaction evaluation from the patient based on a simple Likert scale: 0 = very bad; 1 = bad; 2 = medium; 3 = good; 4 = excellent.
Postoperative nausea and vomitingDay 1 and 2 postoperatively.assessed by the Wengritzky intensity scale (if total score \> 50, the nausea and vomiting are clincally significant)
Respiratory complicationsUp to 6 monthsOccurrence of postoperative respiratory complications
Cardiac complicationsUp to 6 monthsOccurrence of postoperative cardiac complications
Neurological complicationsUp to 6 monthsOccurrence of postoperative neurological complications
Renal,complicationsUp to 6 monthsOccurrence of postoperative renal complications
Infectious complicationsUp to 6 monthsOccurrence of postoperative infectious complications
Chronic pain evaluationAssessed at the 6th postoperative monthChronic pain assessed at the 6th postoperative month by DN4 (Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic 4) score

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORVedat Eljezi, Dr

Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation / Service de Chirurgie Cardio-Vasculaire

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 8, 2026