Skip to content

Study of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in HER2-low, Hormone Receptor Positive, Metastatic Breast Cancer

A Phase 3, Randomized, Multi-center, Open-label Study of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Versus Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in HER2-Low, Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Patients Whose Disease Has Progressed on Endocrine Therapy in the Metastatic Setting (DESTINY-Breast06)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04494425
Acronym
DB-06
Enrollment
866
Registered
2020-07-31
Start date
2020-07-24
Completion date
2026-06-19
Last updated
2026-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

Keywords

Breast Cancer, HR positive, HER2-Low, HER2-Negative, Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201a), Anti-HER2-Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC), DESTINY-Breast06

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with investigator's choice chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-low, hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer patients whose disease has progressed on endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting.

Detailed description

Eligible patients will be those patients who have had disease progression on at least 2 previous lines of endocrine therapies given for the treatment of metastatic disease or disease progression within 6 months of starting first line treatment for metastatic disease with an endocrine therapy combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. All patients must have historically confirmed HR positive (either estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor positive), HER2-low (defined as IHC2+/ISH- and IHC 1+) or HER2 IHC \>0 \<1+ expression, as determined by central laboratory testing results, advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with investigator's choice chemotherapy. This study aims to see if trastuzumab deruxtecan allows patients to live longer without the cancer getting worse, or simply to live longer, compared to patients receiving standard of care chemotherapy. This study is also looking to see how the treatment and the cancer affects patients' quality of life.

Interventions

DRUGTrastuzumab deruxtecan

Trastuzumab deruxtecan by intravenous infusion

DRUGCapecitabine

Investigator's choice standard of care single agent chemotherapy; capecitabine tablets will be given orally.

DRUGPaclitaxel

Investigator's choice standard of care single agent chemotherapy; paclitaxel by intravenous infusion.

DRUGNab-Paclitaxel

Investigator's choice standard of care single agent chemotherapy; nab-paclitaxel by intravenous infusion

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Daiichi Sankyo
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This study is an open-label study that will be conducted "Sponsor-blind". To maintain the integrity of the study, Sponsor personnel directly involved in study conduct will not undertake or have access to efficacy data aggregated by treatment group prior to final data readout for the primary endpoint.

Intervention model description

The study consists of 2 independent open label treatment arms: trastuzumab deruxtecan and Investigator's choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel or capecitabine).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 105 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Patients must be ≥18 years of age * Pathologically documented breast cancer that: 1. is advanced or metastatic 2. has a history of HER2-low or negative expression by local test, defined as IHC 2+/ISH- or IHC 1+ (ISH- or untested) or HER2 IHC 0 (ISH- or untested) 3. has HER2-low or HER2 IHC \>0 \<1+ expression as determined by the central laboratory result established on a tissue sample taken in the metastatic setting 4. was never previously HER2-positive 5. is documented HR+ disease in the metastatic setting. * No prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic breast cancer. * Has adequate tumor samples for assessment of HER2 status * Must have either: 1. disease progression within 6 months of starting first line metastatic treatment with an endocrine therapy combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor or 2. disease progression on at least 2 previous lines of endocrine therapy with or without a targeted therapy in the metastatic setting. Of note with regards to the ≥2 lines of previous ET requirement: disease recurrence while on the first 24 months of starting adjuvant ET, will be considered a line of therapy; these patients will only require 1 line of ET in the metastatic setting. * Has protocol-defined adequate organ and bone marrow function Key

Exclusion criteria

* Ineligible for all options in the investigator's choice chemotherapy arm * Lung-specific intercurrent clinically significant illnesses * Uncontrolled or significant cardiovascular disease or infection * Prior documented interstitial lung disease (ILD)/ pneumonitis that required steroids, current ILD/ pneumonitis, or suspected ILD/ pneumonitis that cannot be ruled out by imaging at screening. * Patients with spinal cord compression or clinically active central nervous system metastases * Prior randomization or treatment in a previous trastuzumab deruxtecan study regardless of treatment arm assignment * Concurrent enrolment in another clinical study, unless it is an observational (non-interventional) clinical study during the follow up period of a prior interventional study (prescreening for this study while a patient is on treatment in another clinical study is acceptable)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Low PopulationResponse evaluations performed at screening, every 6 weeks (q6w) ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then every 9 weeks (q9w) ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) assessed by BICR was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of PD, as defined or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm) from nadir. Median PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its confidence interval (CI) using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationFrom date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Progression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review in the Intent-to-Treat, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) >0 <1+ and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationResponse evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)PFS per RECIST 1.1 assessed by BICR was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of PD, as defined or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir. Median PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Overall Survival (OS) in the Intent-to-Treat PopulationFrom date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Progression-Free Survival Assessed by Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationResponse evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)PFS per RECIST 1.1 assessed by Investigator was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of PD, as defined or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir. Median PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationResponse evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)ORR per RECIST 1.1 assessed by BICR and Investigator was defined as the percentage of participants with at least 1 visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationResponse evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)DOR per RECIST v1.1 was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir. Median DOR was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Objective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ PopulationResponse evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)ORR per RECIST 1.1 assessed by BICR and Investigator was defined as the percentage of participants with at least 1 visit response of CR or PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Duration of Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat PopulationResponse evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)DOR per RECIST v1.1 was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir. Median DOR was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time From Randomization to Second Progression or Death (PFS2) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat PopulationResponse evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)PFS2 was defined as time from randomization to second progression (the earliest of the progression event subsequent to first subsequent therapy) or death; second progression was defined according to local standard clinical practice and might involve any of the following: objective radiological imaging, symptomatic progression, or death. Median PFS2 was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE occurring during any study phase, that fulfilled 1 or more of following criteria: resulted in death, was immediately life-threatening, required in-participant hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was congenital abnormality or birth defect, and was an important medical event that jeopardized participant or required medical treatment to prevent 1 of outcomes listed above. TEAE was any AE that occurred, having been absent before the first dose of study drug, or had worsened in severity or seriousness after initiation of the study drug until the 40-day (+7 days) safety follow-up visit.
Serum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aPre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8; 15 minutes post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 4; and 5 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to determine the concentration of T-DXd, total anti-HER2 antibody and MAAA-1181a in serum.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Baseline (Day 1) and Week 91EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item self-administered questionnaire grouped into 5 multi-item functional scales(physical,role,emotional,cognitive and social),3 multiitem symptom scales(fatigue,pain and nausea/vomiting),2-item global QoL scale,5 single items assessing additional symptoms reported by cancer participants(dyspnea,loss of appetite,insomnia,constipation and diarrhea). All but 2 questions have 4-point scales:1:not at all,2:a little,3:quite a bit,4:very much.2 questions concerning global health status and QoL have 7-point scales with responses ranging from 1:very poor to 7:excellent;higher score:better level of functioning/greater degree of symptoms.For each of 15 scales,final scores were averaged from scores of component items,transformed,range: 0 to 100;higher scores:better functioning,better health related (HR)QoL,or greater level of symptoms(higher scores:opposite interpretations for functioning/QoL and symptoms/problems).Baseline:last observed measurement prior to randomization.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Baseline (Day 1) and Week 58EORTC QLQ-BR45 is an updated version of the BR23. Self-administered instrument includes original 23-items yielding 5 multi-item scores (body image, sexual functioning, arm symptoms, breast symptoms, and systemic therapy side effects). Additional 22 items yield 4 additional multi-item scales (breast satisfaction, endocrine therapy symptoms, skin mucosis symptoms, and endocrine sexual symptoms). Single items assess sexual enjoyment, future perspective and being upset by hair loss. Items are scored on a 4-point verbal rating scale: 1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, and 4: very much; higher score: better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. Scores of these scales were averaged from scores of component items, transformed, and ranged from 0 to 100; higher scores for functioning scales or items indicate better functioning, whereas higher scores for symptom scales or items represent a higher level of symptoms. Baseline:last observed measurement prior to randomization.
Time to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreFrom randomization until date of first symptom deterioration that is confirmed, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that was confirmed at next available assessment, at least 14 days apart, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from study treatment or receives another anti-cancer therapy prior to deterioration.
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) Against Trastuzumab DeruxtecanFrom Day 1 up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints to determine ADA. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA positive post-baseline and not detected at baseline (negative or missing). Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as a baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following drug administration.
Time to First Subsequent Treatment or Death (TFST) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat PopulationFrom Day 1 up to 64 monthsTFST was defined as time from randomization to the start date of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy after discontinuation of randomized treatment or death due to any cause.
Time to Second Subsequent Treatment or Death (TSST) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat PopulationFrom Day 1 up to 64 monthsTSST was defined as time from randomization to the start date of the second subsequent anti-cancer therapy after discontinuation of randomized treatment or death due to any cause.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This Phase III, multi-center, open-label study was conducted in participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer at 273 sites in 28 countries. Results are presented based on primary completion date (PCD) of up to 18 March 2024.

Pre-assignment details

866 participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) or standard of care: Investigator's choice single agent chemotherapy (capecitabine, paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel). As pre-specified in the protocol and statistical analysis plan (SAP), results are presented by treatment group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
T-DXd
Participants received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg via IV infusion every 3 weeks until PD, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another criterion for discontinuation was met.
436
Chemotherapy
Participants received Investigator's choice single-agent chemotherapy (capecitabine 1000 or 1250 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period in 3-week cycles, paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion qw in 3-week cycles or nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion qw for 3 weeks followed by 1-week rest period in 4-week cycles) until PD, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another criterion for discontinuation was met.
430
Total866

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicT-DXdChemotherapyTotal
Age, Continuous58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.92
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.19
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
154 Participants151 Participants305 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
28 Participants32 Participants60 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
397 Participants387 Participants784 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
39 Participants34 Participants73 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
7 Participants12 Participants19 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
231 Participants230 Participants461 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
436 Participants429 Participants865 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
161 / 436174 / 430
other
Total, other adverse events
427 / 434383 / 417
serious
Total, serious adverse events
88 / 43467 / 417

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Low Population

PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) assessed by BICR was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of PD, as defined or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm) from nadir. Median PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its confidence interval (CI) using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: Response evaluations performed at screening, every 6 weeks (q6w) ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then every 9 weeks (q9w) ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The HER2-low population included the subset of participants in the ITT population with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+/ in situ hybridization (ISH)- and IHC 1+ as determined per the interactive response technology (IRT) data for HER2 IHC expression.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
T-DXdProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Low Population13.2 months
ChemotherapyProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Low Population8.1 months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.52, 0.75]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58

EORTC QLQ-BR45 is an updated version of the BR23. Self-administered instrument includes original 23-items yielding 5 multi-item scores (body image, sexual functioning, arm symptoms, breast symptoms, and systemic therapy side effects). Additional 22 items yield 4 additional multi-item scales (breast satisfaction, endocrine therapy symptoms, skin mucosis symptoms, and endocrine sexual symptoms). Single items assess sexual enjoyment, future perspective and being upset by hair loss. Items are scored on a 4-point verbal rating scale: 1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, and 4: very much; higher score: better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. Scores of these scales were averaged from scores of component items, transformed, and ranged from 0 to 100; higher scores for functioning scales or items indicate better functioning, whereas higher scores for symptom scales or items represent a higher level of symptoms. Baseline:last observed measurement prior to randomization.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 58

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected in specified categories are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Body Image-3.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.585
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Sexual Functioning-2.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.708
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Arm Symptoms-5.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.496
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Breast Symptoms-2.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.132
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Systemic Therapy Side Effects5.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.536
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Breast Satisfaction2.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.982
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Endocrine Therapy Symptoms-0.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.316
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Skin Mucosis Symptoms4.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.721
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Endocrine Sexual Symptoms3.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.831
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Sexual Enjoyment-3.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.979
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Future Perspective8.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.161
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Being Upset By Hair Loss2.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.5
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Future Perspective11.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.022
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Body Image-5.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.349
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Endocrine Therapy Symptoms0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.458
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Sexual Functioning1.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.081
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Sexual Enjoyment0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.101
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Arm Symptoms-3.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.54
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Skin Mucosis Symptoms12.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.232
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Breast Symptoms-2.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.631
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Being Upset By Hair Loss0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.825
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Systemic Therapy Side Effects3.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.536
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Endocrine Sexual Symptoms2.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.969
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Module 45 (BR45) Scale Score at Week 58Breast Satisfaction0.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.428
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item self-administered questionnaire grouped into 5 multi-item functional scales(physical,role,emotional,cognitive and social),3 multiitem symptom scales(fatigue,pain and nausea/vomiting),2-item global QoL scale,5 single items assessing additional symptoms reported by cancer participants(dyspnea,loss of appetite,insomnia,constipation and diarrhea). All but 2 questions have 4-point scales:1:not at all,2:a little,3:quite a bit,4:very much.2 questions concerning global health status and QoL have 7-point scales with responses ranging from 1:very poor to 7:excellent;higher score:better level of functioning/greater degree of symptoms.For each of 15 scales,final scores were averaged from scores of component items,transformed,range: 0 to 100;higher scores:better functioning,better health related (HR)QoL,or greater level of symptoms(higher scores:opposite interpretations for functioning/QoL and symptoms/problems).Baseline:last observed measurement prior to randomization.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 91

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected in specified categories are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Nausea/Vomiting9.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.128
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Role Functioning-14.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.631
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Global Health Status/QoL-7.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.529
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Social Functioning-10.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Dyspnea6.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.041
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Emotional Functioning-6.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.44
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Loss of Appetite12.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.682
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Fatigue11.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.367
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Insomnia6.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.19
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Physical Functioning-7.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.389
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Constipation11.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.452
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Pain-1.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.025
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Diarrhea6.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.792
T-DXdChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Cognitive Functioning-8.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.872
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Diarrhea13.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.469
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Physical Functioning-4.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.52
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Emotional Functioning1.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.218
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Cognitive Functioning-6.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.009
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Social Functioning-7.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.656
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Fatigue8.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.444
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Pain-0.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.922
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Nausea/Vomiting-0.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.037
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Global Health Status/QoL-10.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.15
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Dyspnea1.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.767
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Loss of Appetite6.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.616
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Insomnia-15.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.618
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Constipation1.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.503
ChemotherapyChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scale Score at Week 91Role Functioning-12.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.318
Secondary

Duration of Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat Population

DOR per RECIST v1.1 was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir. Median DOR was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Response evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only participants with response in each specified category are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
T-DXdDuration of Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat PopulationBICR Assessment13.7 months
T-DXdDuration of Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat PopulationInvestigator Assessment12.1 months
ChemotherapyDuration of Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat PopulationBICR Assessment7.3 months
ChemotherapyDuration of Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat PopulationInvestigator Assessment6.9 months
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low Population

DOR per RECIST v1.1 was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir. Median DOR was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Response evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The HER2-low population included the subset of participants in the ITT population with HER2 IHC 2+/ISH- and IHC 1+ as determined per the IRT data for HER2 IHC expression. Only participants with response in each specified category are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
T-DXdDuration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationBICR Assessment13.6 months
T-DXdDuration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationInvestigator Assessment12.0 months
ChemotherapyDuration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationBICR Assessment7.3 months
ChemotherapyDuration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationInvestigator Assessment6.9 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) Against Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints to determine ADA. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA positive post-baseline and not detected at baseline (negative or missing). Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as a baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following drug administration.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The ADA population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of T-DXd and who had a non-missing ADA result at any time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
T-DXdNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) Against Trastuzumab DeruxtecanTreatment-induced ADA22 Participants
T-DXdNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) Against Trastuzumab DeruxtecanTreatment-boosted ADA0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE occurring during any study phase, that fulfilled 1 or more of following criteria: resulted in death, was immediately life-threatening, required in-participant hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was congenital abnormality or birth defect, and was an important medical event that jeopardized participant or required medical treatment to prevent 1 of outcomes listed above. TEAE was any AE that occurred, having been absent before the first dose of study drug, or had worsened in severity or seriousness after initiation of the study drug until the 40-day (+7 days) safety follow-up visit.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
T-DXdNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs429 Participants
T-DXdNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs88 Participants
ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs397 Participants
ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs67 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ Population

ORR per RECIST 1.1 assessed by BICR and Investigator was defined as the percentage of participants with at least 1 visit response of CR or PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Response evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. The HER2 IHC \>0 \<1+ population included subset of participants included in ITT population with HER2 IHC \>0 \<1+ as determined by central laboratory testing and who have had at least 24 weeks of follow-up at time of interim futility PCD. Only participants with data collected in specified categories are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T-DXdObjective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ PopulationBICR Assessment: ITT Population61.5 percentage of participants
T-DXdObjective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ PopulationInvestigator Assessment: ITT Population61.5 percentage of participants
T-DXdObjective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ PopulationBICR Assessment: HER2 IHC >0 <1+ Population67.1 percentage of participants
T-DXdObjective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ PopulationInvestigator Assessment: HER2 IHC >0 <1+ Population65.8 percentage of participants
ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ PopulationInvestigator Assessment: HER2 IHC >0 <1+ Population31.6 percentage of participants
ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ PopulationBICR Assessment: ITT Population36.7 percentage of participants
ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ PopulationBICR Assessment: HER2 IHC >0 <1+ Population31.6 percentage of participants
ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Intent-to-Treat and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry >0 <1+ PopulationInvestigator Assessment: ITT Population38.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low Population

ORR per RECIST 1.1 assessed by BICR and Investigator was defined as the percentage of participants with at least 1 visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Response evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The HER2-low population included the subset of participants in the ITT population with HER2 IHC 2+/ISH- and IHC 1+ as determined per the IRT data for HER2 IHC expression.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T-DXdObjective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationBICR Assessment60.4 percentage of participants
T-DXdObjective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationInvestigator Assessment60.4 percentage of participants
ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationBICR Assessment37.9 percentage of participants
ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review and Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationInvestigator Assessment40.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low Population

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The HER2-low population included the subset of participants in the ITT population with HER2 IHC 2+/ISH- and IHC 1+ as determined per the IRT data for HER2 IHC expression.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
T-DXdOverall Survival (OS) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low Population28.9 months
ChemotherapyOverall Survival (OS) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low Population27.1 months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) in the Intent-to-Treat Population

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
T-DXdOverall Survival (OS) in the Intent-to-Treat Population28.9 months
ChemotherapyOverall Survival (OS) in the Intent-to-Treat Population27.4 months
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review in the Intent-to-Treat, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) >0 <1+ and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low Population

PFS per RECIST 1.1 assessed by BICR was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of PD, as defined or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir. Median PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: Response evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants. HER2 IHC \>0 \<1+ population: subset of participants included in ITT population with HER2 IHC \>0 \<1+ as determined by central laboratory testing and who have had at least 24 weeks of follow-up at time of interim futility PCD. HER2-low population: subset of participants in ITT population with HER2 IHC 2+/ISH- and IHC 1+ as determined per IRT data for HER2 IHC expression. Only participants with data collected in specified categories are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
T-DXdProgression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review in the Intent-to-Treat, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) >0 <1+ and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationITT Population13.2 months
T-DXdProgression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review in the Intent-to-Treat, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) >0 <1+ and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationHER2 IHC >0 <1+ Population13.2 months
T-DXdProgression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review in the Intent-to-Treat, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) >0 <1+ and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationHER2-low Population12.8 months
ChemotherapyProgression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review in the Intent-to-Treat, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) >0 <1+ and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationITT Population8.1 months
ChemotherapyProgression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review in the Intent-to-Treat, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) >0 <1+ and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationHER2 IHC >0 <1+ Population8.3 months
ChemotherapyProgression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review in the Intent-to-Treat, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) >0 <1+ and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low PopulationHER2-low Population7.0 months
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival Assessed by Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low Population

PFS per RECIST 1.1 assessed by Investigator was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of PD, as defined or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir), this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir. Median PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: Response evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The HER2-low population included the subset of participants in the ITT population with HER2 IHC 2+/ISH- and IHC 1+ as determined per the IRT data for HER2 IHC expression.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
T-DXdProgression-Free Survival Assessed by Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low Population12.8 months
ChemotherapyProgression-Free Survival Assessed by Investigator in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low Population7.0 months
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181a

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to determine the concentration of T-DXd, total anti-HER2 antibody and MAAA-1181a in serum.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8; 15 minutes post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 4; and 5 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Population: The Pharmacokinetic population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of T-DXd per the protocol for whom any post-dose data were available. Only participants with data collected in specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aMAAA-1181a: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 1NA micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aMAAA-1181a: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 20.261850 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.2096642
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aT-DXd: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 1NA micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aT-DXd: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 24.35225 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 8.958729
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aT-DXd: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 48.21037 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 9.464435
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aT-DXd: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 68.65950 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 4.753592
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aT-DXd: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 811.31496 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 22.894112
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aT-DXd: Day 1: 15 minutes post-dose, Cycle 1135.90160 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 102.989325
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aT-DXd: Day 1: 15 minutes post-dose, Cycle 2136.74872 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 108.860006
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aT-DXd: Day 1: 15 minutes post-dose, Cycle 4124.60481 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 39.812165
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aT-DXd: Day 1: 5 hours post-dose, Cycle 1123.82288 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 30.513998
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aTotal anti-HER2 antibody: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 1NA micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aTotal anti-HER2 antibody: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 25.75841 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 11.351915
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aTotal anti-HER2 antibody: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 412.00513 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 11.087226
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aTotal anti-HER2 antibody: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 613.97891 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 8.72079
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aTotal anti-HER2 antibody: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 817.47641 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 27.144299
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aTotal anti-HER2 antibody: Day 1: 15 minutes post-dose, Cycle 1141.27586 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 114.137606
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aTotal anti-HER2 antibody: Day 1: 15 minutes post-dose, Cycle 2146.17993 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 134.780719
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aTotal anti-HER2 antibody: Day 1: 15 minutes post-dose, Cycle 4131.06830 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 44.22838
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aTotal anti-HER2 antibody: Day 1: 5 hours post-dose, Cycle 1119.64619 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 26.591288
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aMAAA-1181a: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 40.401004 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.2825761
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aMAAA-1181a: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 60.446237 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.2957478
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aMAAA-1181a: Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 80.432894 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.2819292
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aMAAA-1181a: Day 1: 15 minutes post-dose, Cycle 16.014366 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 3.1859583
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aMAAA-1181a: Day 1: 15 minutes post-dose, Cycle 22.985606 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 1.927612
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aMAAA-1181a: Day 1: 15 minutes post-dose, Cycle 42.411409 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 1.5862547
T-DXdSerum Concentration of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), Total Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody and MAAA-1181aMAAA-1181a: Day 1: 5 hours post-dose, Cycle 113.917874 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 6.5178612
Secondary

Time From Randomization to Second Progression or Death (PFS2) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat Population

PFS2 was defined as time from randomization to second progression (the earliest of the progression event subsequent to first subsequent therapy) or death; second progression was defined according to local standard clinical practice and might involve any of the following: objective radiological imaging, symptomatic progression, or death. Median PFS2 was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: Response evaluations performed at screening, q6w ± 1 week from randomization for 48 weeks, and then q9w ± 1 week, starting at Week 48 until PD, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The HER2-low population included subset of participants in ITT population with HER2 IHC 2+/ISH- and IHC 1+ as determined per IRT data for HER2 IHC expression. The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected in specified categories are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
T-DXdTime From Randomization to Second Progression or Death (PFS2) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat PopulationHER2-low Population20.0 months
T-DXdTime From Randomization to Second Progression or Death (PFS2) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat PopulationITT Population20.3 months
ChemotherapyTime From Randomization to Second Progression or Death (PFS2) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat PopulationHER2-low Population14.5 months
ChemotherapyTime From Randomization to Second Progression or Death (PFS2) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat PopulationITT Population14.7 months
Secondary

Time to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale Score

Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that was confirmed at next available assessment, at least 14 days apart, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from study treatment or receives another anti-cancer therapy prior to deterioration.

Time frame: From randomization until date of first symptom deterioration that is confirmed, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreConstipation9.2 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreEmotional Functioning28.2 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreDyspnea20.0 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreCognitive Functioning11.8 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreSocial Functioning11.7 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreDiarrhea29.0 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreFatigue4.3 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreInsomniaNA months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScorePain22.0 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScorePhysical Functioning18.0 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreNausea/Vomiting3.5 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreLoss of Appetite8.3 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreGlobal Health Status/QoL11.3 months
T-DXdTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreRole Functioning10.3 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreGlobal Health Status/QoL10.5 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreDyspnea20.8 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreLoss of Appetite13.8 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreInsomnia15.2 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreConstipation22.0 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreDiarrhea16.5 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScorePhysical Functioning9.9 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreRole Functioning5.5 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreEmotional Functioning17.3 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreSocial Functioning7.7 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreFatigue2.9 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScorePain6.3 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreNausea/Vomiting13.8 months
ChemotherapyTime to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale ScoreCognitive Functioning9.9 months
Secondary

Time to First Subsequent Treatment or Death (TFST) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat Population

TFST was defined as time from randomization to the start date of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy after discontinuation of randomized treatment or death due to any cause.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to 64 months

Secondary

Time to Second Subsequent Treatment or Death (TSST) in the Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-low and Intent-to-Treat Population

TSST was defined as time from randomization to the start date of the second subsequent anti-cancer therapy after discontinuation of randomized treatment or death due to any cause.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to 64 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026