Skip to content

Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis Conservative Treatment

GOLDIC Therapy in Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Stenosis - Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04492774
Acronym
GOLDSTEN
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-07-30
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Canal Stenosis, Spinal Stenosis Lumbar

Brief summary

The trial aims to compare the effectiveness of three methods of conservative treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis (DLSS): GOLDIC autologous serum epidural injections, steroid epidural injections and manual therapy.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (DLSS) is a serious health problem for patients over 65 years of age. It is assumed that in the United States alone, it affects about 200 thousand patients causing significant impairment of their quality of life. Although it is relatively easy to confirm the nature of spinal canal encroaching (disc protrusion, facet hypertrophy, ligamentous folding) by several methods of imaging, the golden standard of DLSS management, especially in the group of older patients, is still the matter of debate. Three main concepts of conservative treatment are considered: 1) pharmacological care - symptom-oriented systemic anty-inflammatory and analgesic agents or local steroid injections, 2) rehabilitations protocols and mechanical devices like traction facilities or corsets to decompress spinal canal or support in case of instability, 3) biological - stimulation of anti-inflammatory action and regeneration capacity by biologically active substances. All methods are offered without strong evidence of its efficacy. AIM: Comparison of the effectiveness of three treatment protocols in DLSS: epidural injections of autologous serum (Gold Induced Cytokines, Goldic), epidural steroid injections, manual therapy in the concept of spinal canal venous drainage. Research hypothesis: The use of Goldic serum in epidural injections improves the condition of patients with DLSS during the observation period longer than steroid injections and the rehabilitation protocol. DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial without blinding. SETTING: Open study for outpatients, single-centre study. POPULATION: the local adult population METHODS: Three groups of patients (A, B, C) with confirmed DLSS in MRI, without limiting sex, age, meeting health conditions according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There will be 30 people in each group (90 people in total). Group A - Goldic serum therapy - 4 injections at 3-day intervals containing single doses of serum (4 doses of 3 ml in total), injections performed into the epidural space under ultrasound control by the same operator. Group B - steroid therapy with Dexaven 4 mg / 1 ml - 2 injections at weekly intervals containing single doses of dexamethasone (total dose of 8 mg), injections will be performed into the epidural space under ultrasound control by the same operator. Group C - manual therapy according to the concept of venous drainage - a repeatable treatment scheme for each patient; decompression of the thoracic outlet, diaphragm release, sacroiliac joints (SI) mobilizations, rib-sternum release, rib raising technique - 4 sessions (1 x weekly - approx. 40 min). Control tools: NRS Pain Scale (0-10), Oswestry Disability Index, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), EQ-5D-5L, Control points: Initial Assessment (IA), 4,12, 24 weeks after last intervention.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTGoldic serum

epidural injections

epidural injections

PROCEDUREManual therapy

Veno-lymphatic drainage

Sponsors

Sutherland Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

None (Open label)

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical signs of lumbar spinal stenosis 2. Radiological signs of lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed by MRI 3. No contraindications to steroid therapy or spinal epidural injections (glaucoma, high RR values, diabetes, anticoagulants, active infections, etc.) 4. Mental state allowing cooperation during manual therapy 5. An adult who consents to participate in the study 6. No previous surgery or spinal epidural injections

Exclusion criteria

1. The presence of serious neurological deficits 2. Stenosis of other origin - post-traumatic, spondylolisthesis, cancer, infection 3. Contraindications to steroid therapy or spinal injections (glaucoma, high RR values, diabetes, anticoagulants, active infections, etc.) 4. Previous surgery or spinal epidural injections of lumbar spine 5. Mental state preventing cooperation during manual therapy 6. Lack of consent to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in EQ-5D-5L index from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to 24 weeksEQ-5D-5L index estimated from EQ-5D-5L desrcriptive system based on Polish directly measured value set. Mininmum: -0.590; Maximum: 1.0; More points means better outcome.
Change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to 24 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 50 (the worst score).
Change in Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to 24 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 12 (the best score) - 55 (the worst score).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 4 weeksChange from baseline to 4 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 50 (the worst score).
Change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 12 weeksChange from baseline to 12 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 50 (the worst score).
Change in pain intensity according to Numeric Rating ScaleChange from baseline to 4 weeksGeneric outcome measure. Range: 0 (no pain) - 10 (the worst possible pain).
Change in Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) from baseline to 12 weeksChange from baseline to 12 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 12 (the best score) - 55 (the worst score).
Change in Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) from baseline to 4 weeksChange from baseline to 4 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 12 (the best score) - 55 (the worst score).
Change in EQ-5D-5L index from baseline to 4 weeksChange from baseline to 4 weeksEQ-5D-5L index estimated from EQ-5D-5L desrcriptive system based on Polish directly measured value set. Mininmum: -0.590; Maximum: 1.0; More points means better outcome.
Change in EQ-5D-5L index from baseline to 12 weeksChange from baseline to 12 weeksEQ-5D-5L index estimated from EQ-5D-5L desrcriptive system based on Polish directly measured value set. Mininmum: -0.590; Maximum: 1.0; More points means better outcome.

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026