Skip to content

Triceps Taping on Elbow Flexion Tightness in Extended Erb's Palsy

Role of Triceps Kinesiology Taping on Elbow Flexion Tightness in Extended Erb's Palsy Infants

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04491812
Enrollment
32
Registered
2020-07-29
Start date
2020-08-10
Completion date
2020-11-30
Last updated
2020-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deformity Flexion

Brief summary

To determine the role of using Kinesiology tape on the prevention of elbow flexion tightness in infants with extended Erb's palsy.

Detailed description

PURPOSE: To determine the role of using Kinesiology tape on the prevention of elbow flexion tightness in infants with extended Erb's palsy. BACKGROUND: BACKGROUND Neglecting or even delay in Brachial plexus birth palsy management, may result in substantial and chronic impairment. Physiotherapy, microsurgical nerve reconstruction, secondary joint corrections, and muscle transpositions are employed to help the child maximize function in the affected upper extremity. Kinesiology taping can have an effect on muscle performance and support joint by improving proprioception, normalizing muscle tone, correct the inappropriate positions and stimulate skin receptors. The possible effect of kinesiotaping on muscle strength has been investigated by numerous researchers that have theorized that kinesiotaping facilitates an immediate increase in muscle strength by generating a concentric pull on the fascia. HYPOTHESES: There will be no role of Kinesiology tape on the prevention of elbow flexion tightness in infants with extended Erb's palsy. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there a role of using Kinesiology tape in preventing elbow flexion tightness in infants with extended Erb's palsy?

Interventions

OTHERKinesio Tape

Elastic Kinesiology Tape

OTHERPhysical therapy program

designed physical therapy program

Sponsors

MTI University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

single blind masking

Intervention model description

Group A: physical therapy program Group B: physical therapy program inaddition to kinesiotaping

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to 6 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 3-6 months of age * had unilateral extended BPBP involving cervical 5, 6, and 7 roots lesion * based on an EMG referral by a physiatrist * had positive grasp reflex on both sides * had asymmetrical Moro reflex on the affected side.

Exclusion criteria

\- surgical interferences arm fracture or dislocations hypersensitivity to latex and adhesive tapes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Elbow extension ROM3 monthsThe range of motion of the extension of the elbow will be measured by smartphone goniometer G-Pro and recorded in degrees

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
muscle strength3 monthselbow flexors and extensors muscle strength will be measured using the Toronto Active Movement Scale and recorded by number scale from 0-7; 0 meaning no contraction while 7 mean normal power

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactRadwa S Ahmed, MSc
radwa.said@pt.mti.edu.eg+201004008503

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026