FindTrial
Sign In

Surgical Bypass Versus Hybrid Approaches for Critical Limb Ischemia

Long Surgical Bypass Versus Hybrid Approaches for Management of Critical Limb Ischemia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04490408
Enrollment
52
Registered
2020-07-29
Start date
2014-09-20
Completion date
2019-04-17
Last updated
2020-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Lower Limb Ischemia

Brief summary

The present randomized study proposed to compare the immediate postoperative and 2-year clinical outcomes of long surgical bypass and hybrid approaches in patients with multilevel critical lower limb ischemia.

Interventions

PROCEDURElong surgical bypass

long surgical bypass and hybrid approaches in patients with multilevel critical lower limb ischemia.

PROCEDUREHybrid approach

Hybrid approach including bypass and endovascular revascularization

Sponsors

Egyptian Biomedical Research Network
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* TASC II type D femoropopliteal lesions with intact ipsilateral femoral pulse. * Fontaine classification stage IV (gangrene or necrosis). * Rutherford grade III and IV category 5 and 6 with salvageable foot

Exclusion criteria

* heart failure * liver failure * renal impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Late occlusion2 yearsLate occlusion of the affected vessels

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026