Skip to content

Digestion of Gluten in the Presence of Enzymes

GlutDigest - Enzymes-assisted Gluten Digestion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04489810
Acronym
GlutDigest
Enrollment
11
Registered
2020-07-28
Start date
2020-10-19
Completion date
2021-04-08
Last updated
2025-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Main Focus: Gluten and Starch Digestibility

Keywords

Gluten, Starch, Digestive enzymes, Probiotics

Brief summary

This study evaluates the impact of two dietary supplements (Elevase® and DE111®) and of oatmeal properties on the digestion of gluten and starch and on the glycemic response.

Detailed description

RATIONALE Two important factors can influence the proportions of gluten and starch that resist digestion: (1) enzyme availability and specificity and (2) the structural properties of the food. Elevase®, is a dietary supplement based on an enzyme preparation which effectively degrades gluten in vitro (Healey, Hall et al. unpublished). As it has also been found that the rate of wheat protein digestion can be increased in the presence of amylases (Smith, Pan et al. 2015), Elevase® is also enriched with amylase to aid in starch digestion. The structural properties of food are influenced by numerous factors including meal preparation practices. Two common practices that can influence nutrient availability differently are heating vs. refrigerating (e.g. oat porridge vs. soaked and refrigerated oats). Bacillus subtilis DE111® can produce and secrete many enzymes, including proteases, which, if secreted into the environment of the digestive tract, could support digestion and, in particular, the digestion of gluten. However, it is not clear whether diet supplementation with DE111 is a physiologically viable approach in terms of probiotic survival in the gastrointestinal tract. PURPOSE The aims of this study are to better understand the impact of each of these factors and whether supplementation with probiotic spores is a viable option.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

Maltodextrin capsule manufactured to mimic the Elevase® and DE111® capsules

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTElevase®

1 capsule containing 350 mg of Elevase®

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDE111®

1 capsule containing Bacillus subtilis DE111

OTHERMeal A

Oatmeal porridge - serving of cooked oats containing 50g of carbohydrates (excluding sugars); Wheat cereal - serving of wheat cereal providing 1g of gluten; Water - 125 mL

OTHERMeal B

Refrigerated oatmeal - serving of refrigerated oats containing 50g of carbohydrates (excluding sugars); Wheat cereal - serving of wheat cereal providing 1g of gluten; Water - 125 mL

Sponsors

Teagasc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Atlantia Food Clinical Trials
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Each participant attended a clinic for one day for an acute assessment of the acute effects of treatment. This was done on the same day over 4 consecutive weeks. At each visit the participant received 1 of 4 different treatments

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has given written informed consent * Subject has an ileostomy stable for at least 3 months post-operative and shows normal stoma functions * Subject is otherwise healthy * Subject is available to participate in the study sessions on the proposed dates

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has coeliac disease or allergy to wheat products and/or any other ingredients in the test meal and standard meals * Case of obstruction of the stoma in the past 3 months * Body mass index \< 18 kg/m2 or \> 30 kg/m2. * Diagnosed mouth, throat or active gastrointestinal pathology (other than ileostomy) that may affect normal ingestion and digestion of food. * History of pancreatic disease * Subject is immunocompromised (HIV positive, transplant patient, on antirejection medications, on a steroid for \>30 days, or chemotherapy or radiotherapy within the last year) * Subject has Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus. * Subject has a history of bariatric surgery. * Subject has a history of drug and/or alcohol abuse at the time of enrolment * Subject is currently participating in another study, or plans to participate in another study during the study period * Women of child-bearing potential who do not use an acceptable method of contraception * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Undigested wheat protein9-hour period after the test mealDifference between the mean concentration of undigested wheat protein in ileal effluent samples.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vegetative DE111 cells9-hour period after the test mealMean concentration of DE111® cells recovered in the ileal effluent in the vegetative state.
Glycemic responseAt baseline, and at different time-points during 9 hours after after consuming the test meal.Difference between the mean area under the glucose concentration (measured in the interstitial fluid) curves following each treatment
Undigested starchAt baseline and once every hour in the 9-hour period after consumption of the test meal.Difference between the mean concentration of undigested starch in ileal effluent samples.
Undigested food particles9-hour period after the test mealPictures of undigested foods particles and microscopy will be combined for a combined assessment of macro- and micro- structural characteristics of the food particles recovered in ileal effluent samples.

Countries

Ireland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026