Skip to content

Outcome After Surgical Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) in the Second Part of Duodenum

Outcome After Surgical Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Second Part of Duodenum: Is Localized Resection Appropriate?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04487002
Acronym
GIST
Enrollment
53
Registered
2020-07-27
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2020-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of Duodenum

Keywords

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of duodenum; localized resection; survival

Brief summary

it is hypothesized that long term outcomes of localized resection of GIST tumors located in the second part of the duodenum are comparable to those of the traditional treatment by radical resection of the head o pancreas and the entire duodenum

Detailed description

the Medical records of patient with second part duodenal GIST were reviewed retrospectively for symptoms, clinical examination, preoperative workup including standard imaging by multi-slice computed tomography (CT) of abdomen and pelvis with oral and intravenous contrast. Endoscopic ultrasound was routinely perfumed to assess the depth of tumor invasion (T-stage) and to obtain a tissue sample by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Definitive diagnosis was based on CT images and post-operative pathology report. Patients were subjected to curative localized resection with free margins by frozen section examination or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) if the tumor was invading the major duodenal papilla. Localized duodenal resection was performed by one of two techniques: The first one was excision of part of the wall (wedge resection). Reconstruction was performed either by primary closure without tension, provided that adequate lumen is preserved, or by side to side roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy (DJ) if there was tension on the edges of the duodenal defect. The second technique was employed in case of larger size tumors and entailed excision of D2 (segmental duodenectomy) to be followed by anastomosis (side to side roux-en-Y DJ or end-to-end DJ). Great care to avoid tumor rupture was emphasized in all operations. Standard lymph node dissection was not performed. Pathologic data (tumor location, size, margins, and mitoses per 50 high-power fields \[HPF\]) and immunohistochemical analysis were collected and tumors classified into very low, low, moderate and high risk based on Miettinen classification that also incorporates tumor size. All patients (those who underwent localized resection with safety margin and those who underwent PD) were followed up and re-evaluated at one, three, six and twelve months then once per year for a total follow-up period of 3 years. Contrast-enhanced multi-slice CT abdomen/pelvis was performed after 6 months then yearly for detection of recurrence. Using PASS program version 20, the minimum sample size required was 45 patients with duodenal GIST using 3% local recurrence rate and 5% error at 5% level of significance and 80% power. Data were analyzed using IBM-SPSS software package version 20. Qualitative variables were summarized using numbers and percent. Quantitative variables were summarized using mean and standard deviation (SD) as data was normally distributed by kolmogrov-smirnov test. Survival analysis was done using life tables, log-rank test and Kaplan Meier's curve. All statistical analysis was conducted at 5% level of significance.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsurgical resection

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with second part duodenal GIST

Exclusion criteria

* metastatic, irresectible and unfitness for surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
survival3 yearsSurvival was calculated from the date of surgery to the time of death
recurrence rate3 years. Contrast-enhanced multi-slice CT abdomen/pelvis was performed after 6 months then yearly for detection of recurrence

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
post-operative complicationsone monthleak, wound infection, chest infection

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026