Skip to content

What Embryoselection for What Chance of Success ? EmbryoSelect Study

A Randomized Double-blind Trial Evaluating the Live Birth Rate After Transfer of Embryos Cultured in Time Lapse Incubator Compared With Conventional Incubator: Embryoselect

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04484181
Acronym
EmbryoSelect
Enrollment
500
Registered
2020-07-23
Start date
2020-10-01
Completion date
2027-09-15
Last updated
2025-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

Embryo, In vitro Fertilization, Selection, Time lapse, Single embryo transfer

Brief summary

The aim of the research is to evaluate the results of the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) attempt according to the type of embryo culture. From the fertilization to the day 2 transfer, embryos are cultured in standard incubator or in a time lapse technology (TLT). TLT offers an uninterrupted culture environment with a morphokinetic evaluation, whereas culture in standard incubator involves discontinuous morphological embryo evaluation. The principal objective is to compare the live birth rate after the fresh embryo transfer, in a cohort of women less than 39 years-old.

Detailed description

Embryo evaluation and selection is fundamental in clinical IVF in order to obtain a live birth in a shorter delay as possible, but minimizing the risk of multiple pregnancies. TLT was introduced few years ago in clinical practice and allows the continuous follow up of the embryo development. In IVF centers, embryos are preferentially cultured in TL system with undisturbed environmental conditions. This provides information about the development of the embryos in time intervals of 15min and adds kinetic criteria for embryo evaluation and selection. In conventional incubator, the follow up of embryo development consists in 3 static time point observations. Many reviews and observational studies have discussed the value of time-lapse monitoring but it is as yet unclear, however, whether the TLT improves the results of IVF. It has been suggested that the clinical benefits of applying new technologies should be verified and documented by randomized controlled trials. Moreover, the cumulative live birth rate and the delay for conception were rarely reported. The study aims to evaluate the results of the first IVF attempts comparing classical embryo culture in standard incubator and embryo culture and follow up in TLT. The hypothesis is that the undisturbed culture and the selection based on continuous time-lapse images improve the results of the single embryo fresh transfer and increase the cumulative live birth rate. Patients will be randomized the day of the puncture for the type of culture: standard incubation or TLT. The results of the fresh and successive vitrified-warmed embryo transfer will be prospectively collect and patients will be followed until live birth. The attempt will be considered ended after a live birth, if all the frozen embryos are transferred, after 24 months follow up or after surrender.

Interventions

OTHEREmbryo culture in time lapse technology (TLT)

In the TLT group, the selection for transfer was based on morphological and kinetic criteria (with the use of an algorithm). Embryos will be cultured and selected for fresh transfer.

OTHEREmbryo culture in conventional incubator

For the standard incubation group, the selection for transfer will be based on morphological criteria. Embryos will be cultured and selected for fresh transfer.

Sponsors

Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique Inter-Régionale (PHRC-I)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Intervention model description

In the two arms, embryos were cultured and selected for fresh transfer. For the standard incubation group, the selection for transfer was based on morphological criteria. In the TLT group, the selection for transfer was based on morphological and kinetic criteria (with the use of an algorithm).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* first IVF/ICSI attempt with fresh transfer, * women ≥18 years-old and \<39 years-old, * signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* attempts with donor, * comprehension problem, * frozen gametes, * BMI\>35 kg/m2, * history of 3 or more miscarriages, * uterine pathology, * serodiscordant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Live birth rateMonth 9Live birth rate per punction after the first single embryo fresh transfer. The live birth will be collected 9 months after the first positive pregnancy test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative live birth rateMonth 9Cumulative live birth rate of the attempt (fresh transfer and vitrified-warmed embryo transfers until live birth or use of all vitrified embryos)
Clinical pregnancy rateWeek 6Clinical pregnancy rate (cardiac activity at 6 weeks of amenorrhea) per punction and cumulated
Ongoing pregnancy rateWeek 24Ongoing pregnancy rate (at more than 24 weeks of amenorrhea) per punction and cumulated
Delay to obtain a live birthMonth 9Delay to obtain a live birth (= number of transfers to obtain a live birth)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026