Skip to content

Tactile Low Vision Labeling of Ophthalmic Drops

Utility and Efficacy of Tactile Labeling of Ophthalmic Drops for Identity and Frequency of Administration in Low Vision

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04483882
Enrollment
46
Registered
2020-07-23
Start date
2020-07-24
Completion date
2021-12-15
Last updated
2021-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Vision Aids

Keywords

Low Vision, Labeling, Tactile

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is an evaluation of a tactile labeling strategy developed in the Ophthalmology Clinical Research Center at University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in collaboration with the UTMB Maker Space to improve low vision patients capability to identify their topical ophthalmic drop treatments and the frequency with which they should be administered. The labeling strategy includes protrusions as frequency markers and shapes to differentiate between treatments of similar frequency prescription.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is an evaluation of a tactile labeling strategy developed in the Ophthalmology Clinical Research Center at University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in collaboration with the UTMB Maker Space to improve low vision patients capability to identify their topical ophthalmic drop treatments and the frequency with which they should be administered. The labeling strategy includes protrusions as frequency markers and shapes to differentiate between treatments of similar frequency prescription. The first aim is to evaluate the patient capability to identify the number of protrusions and therefore the frequency of administration prescribed. This should be completed in a timeframe that is not frustrating or problematic to the patient in practice. The second aim is to evaluate the patient ability to differentiate between drugs with similar frequencies based on a shape on the frequency protrusions in a tactile manner. This also should be completed in a timeframe that is not over burdensome or frustrating to the patient. The protocol is designed to evaluate this tactile labeling design in the population it is designed to support.

Interventions

DEVICETactile Labels for Drug identity and dose frequency

The tactile labeling proposed in this protocol is rigid labeling. A ring-clip has an inner diameter of 12.5cm, an outer diameter of 16 cm, and a height of 1.5 cm. The ring is cut at 2 cm to form a semi-circle allowing it to be clipped onto the bottleneck. The ring clip fits most if not all prescription eye drop bottles. The individual protrusions with shapes at the end can be cut off by the pharmacist to match the frequency of administration prescribed.

Sponsors

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Subjects will be blinded to product to be provided for visual and tactile definition of label product and type and frequency of prescription.

Intervention model description

Single Group, Blinded, Sham controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

IInclusion Criteria: Phase I: * Candidates will be healthy adults between 18 and 100 years of age * Candidates will complete the consent briefing and consent documents prior to participating in any study activities. * Phase II:Inclusion Criteria: * Candidates will be between 50 and 100 years of age. * Candidates will have a BCVA equal to or less than 20/70 or have central vision field less than 20 degrees. * Candidates will complete the consent briefing and consent documents prior to participating in any study activities.

Exclusion criteria

Phase I: * Candidates who do not complete the consent briefing and indicate consent through completion of consent documents with or without a witness (as indicated by their ability to read the documents for themselves out loud with whatever optical assistance necessary (large print, magnification, optical correction, etc.), prior to any study activity, will not be included in this study. * History of prior non-compliance or the presence or history of psychiatric condition (including drug or alcohol addiction) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, make it difficult for the subject to comply with the study procedures or follow the investigators instructions. Phase II; * Candidates under 50 years or older than 100 years of age will be excluded. * Candidates with a BCVA better than 20/70 or have central vision field greater than 20 degrees, will be excluded. * Candidates with comorbidities that in the opinion of the investigator confound their ability to complete the assessments in this study (ie. Advanced neuropathy of the hands, dementia, or mental incapacity) will be excluded. * Candidates who do not complete the consent briefing and indicate consent through completion of consent documents with or without a witness (as indicated by their ability to read the documents for themselves out loud with whatever optical assistance necessary (large print, magnification, optical correction, etc.), prior to any study activity, will not be included in this study. * History of prior non-compliance or the presence or history of psychiatric condition (including drug or alcohol addiction) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, make it difficult for the subject to comply with the study procedures or follow the investigators instructions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correct Drug Identity by Shape2 minutesSubjects Assessment and Report of drug identity by shape of label protrusions
Correct Drug Identity by Color2 minutesSubject Assessment and Report of drug identity by color of tactile label
Correct Dose Frequency by Tactile Protrusions2 minutesSubject Assessment and Report of Drug Dosing frequency by number of protrusions of tactile label

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026