Skip to content

Early Percutaneous Cryoablation for Pain Control After Rib Fractures Among Elderly Patients

Early Percutaneous Cryoablation for Pain Control After Rib Fractures Among Elderly Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04482582
Acronym
EPERC
Enrollment
127
Registered
2020-07-22
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rib Fractures

Keywords

rib fractures, CT guided cryoneurolysis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to provide long-term pain control for elderly patients with rib fractures in order to minimize their risk of complications and return them to baseline functional capacity

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to provide long-term pain control for elderly patients with rib fractures in order to minimize their risk of complications and return them to baseline functional capacity. In order to do this, we would offer a minimally invasive solution known as Cryoneurolysis. By directly applying cold Cryoneurolysis to the nerves, this can destroy nerve axons, resulting in Wallerian degeneration of the distal nerve without distorting epineural or perineurial tissue. The application of cryoneurolysis will help reduce the amount of narcotics the patient would need, and potentially lead to a better post-injury quality of life.

Interventions

RADIATIONCryoneurolysis

Patients will be offered a minimally invasive solution known as cryoneurolysis. By directly applying a cold cryoneurolysis probe to the nerves the axon is destroyed, resulting in Wallerian degeneration of the distal nerve without distorting epineurial or perineurial tissue. Application of cryoneurolysis will help reduce the amount of narcotics the patient would need to take and instead provide them longer term pain control with minimal risk.

OTHERStandard of Care

Patients will be provided regular standard of care at the Stanford Hospital with long-term follow-up provided at the Stanford Center for Reconstruction after Chest Wall Injury.

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

We are proposing a prospective, randomized trial evaluating efficacy of image-guided percutaneous intercostal cryoneurolysis (pICN) for pain control after traumatic rib fractures in persons \>=65 years. Eligible patients would be enrolled by the trauma service after consent or assent is obtained. Patients will be randomized to either pICN within 72 hours of presentation or existing standard-of-care.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

i) Patients greater than 65 years with any acute rib fracture ii) Pain score equal to or greater than 5 with deep inspiration. iii) Presenting and admitted to Stanford Emergency Department

Exclusion criteria

i) Radiographic evidence of metastasis to ribs ii) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score \<13 iii) Patients undergoing SSRF iv) Rib fractures located \< 3cm from spinous process v) Coagulopathy (INR \>1.5, Pat \< 100) vi) Other factors precluding cryoablation at IR attending's discretion vii) If only ribs broken are 1,2 or 10,11, 12

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute Pain Assessed by Numeric Pain ScoreHospital discharge (up to 1 month)The patient will be asked to verbalize their numeric pain score on the day of hospital discharge. Pain is measured on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain. Note: The timing of hospital discharge varies by patient as these are polytrauma patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey Scale Score1 month, 3 months, 12 months (all from hospital discharge)The 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey is a widely used composite score used to gauge overall health. The composite score is based on 8 domains scores contained in the SF-12 questionnaire, which will be administered to the patient by study/clinical staff upon discharge. The composite score is split into two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Both scores are on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores representing better mental health-related (MCS) or physical health-related (PCS) quality of life. The means of both scores are standardized to 50 with a standard devation of 10.
30-day Mortality1 month after hospital dischargeWill be obtained from chart review after discharge
Number of Participants Requiring ICU Admission1 month after hospital dischargeWill be obtained from chart review after discharge
Length of Hospital StayUp to 1 monthThe Length of Stay will be obtained from the patient's chart after discharge and will depend on the level of care required for recovery from their injuries.
Use of Narcotic EquivalentsHospital discharge (up to 1 month), 1 month, 3 months, 12 months after hospital dischargeDaily oral narcotic equivalents
Number of Participants With a Rib-specific Readmission Within 30 Days of Discharge1 month after hospital dischargeThe patient will be admitted back to the hospital if pain level relates to rib-specific injuries such as hemothorax and pneumonia.
The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E) Score1 month, 3 months, 12 months (all from hospital discharge)The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is a global scale for functional outcome that rates patient status into one of five categories: Dead, Vegetative State, Severe Disability, Moderate Disability or Good Recovery. The Extended GOS (GOSE) provides more detailed categorization into eight categories by subdividing the categories of severe disability, moderate disability and good recovery into a lower and upper category: 1. Death (D) 2. Vegetative state (VS) 3. Lower severe disability (SD -) 4. Upper severe disability (SD +) 5. Lower moderate disability ( MD -) 6. Upper moderate disability ( MD +) 7. Lower good recovery (GR -) 8. Upper good recovery (GR +) The questionnaire will be administered to the patient by study/clinical staff upon discharge.
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) and Pain Rating Index (PRI) Scale Score1 month, 3 months, 12 months (all from hospital discharge)The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is a validated 20 question instrument to quantify subjective pain and the scoring system yields a Pain Rating Index (PRI) score between Mild, Moderate or Severe. The questionnaire will be administered to the patient by study/ clinical staff at 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month follow-ups. Using the questionnaires, McGill Present Pain Intensity (PPI), Sensory, Affective, and Visual Analogue Scale scores will be calculated and reported. PPI and Visual Analogue Scale scores are on a scale of 0-10, Sensory scores are on a scale of 0-33, and Affective scores are on a scale of 0-12. Higher scores indicate worse pain for all McGill scores.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJoseph D Forrester, MD

Stanford University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNishita Kothary, MD

Stanford University

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were pre-screened to determine if they met eligibility criteria. If this was met, they were approached by a CRC for in-person consent at Stanford Healthcare (SHC). The enrollment period was from June 1, 2021, to April 15, 2024.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous79.5 years
Daily opioid equivalents in first 24 hours25 MMEs
Highest pain score in first 24 hours8.04 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black of African American
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown or not reported
12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 563 / 54
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 5624 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 5611 / 54

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026