Skip to content

Clinical Comparison of Different Adhesives in NCCLs

Clinical Comparison of Different Adhesives in NCCLs

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04481087
Enrollment
34
Registered
2020-07-22
Start date
2018-02-10
Completion date
2026-06-10
Last updated
2025-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Wear

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial is to evaluate the performances of a universal adhesive in three different application modes, a self-etch adhesive and an etch&rinse adhesive in restoration of non-caries cervical lesions. Thirty-four patients will receive restorations. Lesions will be divided into 5 groups according to adhesive systems and application modes: CU-SE: Clearfil Universal Bond Quick in self-etch mode, CU-SLE: Clearfil Universal Bond Quick in selective etch mode, CU-ER: Clearfil Universal Bond Quick in etch&rinse mode, CSE: Clearfil SE Bond, TB: Tetric N-Bond. Restorations (Tetric N-Ceram composite) will be scored with regard to retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, recurrent caries and post operative sensitivity using modified USPHS criteria after 48 months. Two examiners who is not involved in the placement of restorations will conduct the evaluations. Descriptive statistics will be performed using Chi-square tests.

Interventions

DEVICETetric N-Bond

Adhesive systems

Adhesive systems

DEVICEClearfil Universal Bond Quick

Adhesive systems

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* being 18 years or older, * having no medical or behavioral problems preventing then from attending review visits, * having at least 5 tooth with NCCLs * having antagonist teeth

Exclusion criteria

* poor gingival health, * uncontrolled, rampant caries, * bruxism, * removable partial dentures, * xerostomia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical performances of different adhesivestwo yearsTwo year examinations according to USPHS criteria

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026