Skip to content

Developmental of Clinical Prediction Rule for Females Responding to Proximal Control Exercises

Development of Clinical Prediction Rule for Classifying Females With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Who Respond to Proximal Control Exercises

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04481022
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-07-22
Start date
2020-09-03
Completion date
2021-08-30
Last updated
2020-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Clinical Prediction Rule

Keywords

clinical predicton rule, proximal control exercises

Brief summary

the aim of study is to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI), age, duration of symptoms, pain severity and knee angle valgus on patient̕̕s response to proximal control exercises.

Detailed description

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is recognized as one of the most common lower-extremity disorders encountered by orthopaedic physical therapists. Females were 2.23 times more likely to develop PFPS than males. Various authors have suggested that hip weakness may be an impairment associated with PFPS, because poor hip control may lead to abnormal lower extremity or patellofemoral motions. Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are tools designed to improve decision making in clinical practice by assisting practitioners in making a particular diagnosis, establishing a prognosis, or matching patients to optimal interventions.

Interventions

OTHERproximal control exercises

study investigates the effectiveness of proximal control exercises for patients with PFPS in improving pain and function. The findings of this systematic review are consistent with previous evidence reporting effectiveness of exercise for PFPS. In particular, there is consistent moderate to high quality evidence (three RCT, one CCT, three cohort studies, and one case series) that proximal interventions provide relief of pain and improved function in the short term, whereas the knee programs have variable effectiveness. Physical therapists should consider using proximal interventions for early stage treatment for PFPS (Peters et al., 2013). After 4 weeks of a combined knee and hip strengthening exercise program, sedentary females with PFPS had a greater reduction in pain during stair descent compared to the group who performed knee strengthening exercises only. Both groups also showed significant improvement in function and pain during stair ascent (Fakuda et al., 2010).

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 to 35 years. * Anterior or retropatellar knee pain of non-traumatic origin that was greater than six weeks duration and provoked by at least two predefined activities (prolonged sitting or kneeling, squatting, jogging or running, hopping, jumping, or stair walking). * Pain on palpation of the patellar facets, or with step down from a 15 cm step, or double leg squat.

Exclusion criteria

1. Concomitant injury or pathology of other knee structures. 2. Previous knee surgery. 3. patellofemoral instability (history of sublaxation or dislocation; positive apprehension test). 4. knee joint effusion. 5. Osgood-Schlatter's. 6. hip or lumbar spine pain (local or referred). 7. physiotherapy within previous year; prior foot orthoses treatment or use of anti inflammatories or corticosteroids.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
level of painbaselinevisual analogue scale 100-mm horizontal line anchored by word descriptors at each end by no the left and worst imaginable pain on the right
functional statusbaselineKujala questionnaire is a 13-items knee specific self-report questionnaire. It documents response to six activities thought to be associated specifically with anterior knee pain syndrome (walking, running, jumping, climbing stairs, squatting, and sitting for prolonged periods with knees bent), as well as symptoms such as limp, inability to bear weight through the affected limb, swelling, abnormal patellar movement, muscle atrophy and limitation of knee flexion. This questionnaire was used to ssess the individual's functional status and PFPS experienced during specific functional tasks.
Dynamic knee valgus 2d frontal plane projection anglebaseline2D frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) analysis to measure dynamic knee valgus. for 2D FPPA analysis, the centers of each of hip, knee and ankle joints will be determined using a standard tape measure, markers will be placed at the midpoint of the ankle malleoli for the center of the ankle joint, midpoint of the femoral condyles to approximate the center of the knee joint, and on the proximal thigh at the midpoint of the line from the anterior superior iliac spine to the knee joint center.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
isometric muscle power of hip abductor and external rotationbaselineHand held dynamometer will be used to asses isomteric hip abductor and isometric hip external rotator power

Contacts

Primary Contactkhaled AlaaEldin Fetouh, Master
drkhaled929292@yahoo.com01090737464
Backup ContactAhmed Mohamed El Melhat, dr
ahmed.elmelhat@cu.edu.eg01112595022

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026