Skip to content

Is Acute Appendicitis Still a Clinical Diagnosis?

Is Acute Appendicitis Still a Clinical Diagnosis? Use of Preoperative Diagnostic Imaging Before Appendectomy in Denmark During 2000-15.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04477824
Enrollment
82000
Registered
2020-07-20
Start date
2000-01-01
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2020-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appendicitis

Keywords

Appendicitis, Appendectomy, Preoperative diagnostic imaging

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the use of preoperative diagnostic imaging before appendectomy in Denmark and whether it has changed over time during the period from 2000-15. Secondly, the study aims to investigate regional, age and gender differences in the same setting.

Detailed description

Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of abdominal pain (1) and appendectomy is the most common emergency surgical procedure performed worldwide (2). During the last decades, there has been a paradigm shift in both diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis - surgical treatment has changed from open to laparoscopic appendectomy (3). Acute appendicitis has traditionally been a clinical diagnosis, but the use of preoperative diagnostic imaging has, in some countries, increased dramatically (4). The use of computed tomography (CT) before appendectomy is in the United States up to 90%, in England 13% and in Holland almost all patients undergo ultrasound and/or CT before appendectomy (1). The use of antibiotics can be successful in the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis verified on CT, and the use of CT has significantly lowered the negative appendectomy rate compared to clinical evaluation only (1). But the use of CT is inevitably inducing radiation and increasing lifetime risk of cancer - especially in younger patients who most frequently present with acute appendicitis (1,5). It is estimated that CT of the abdominal region can avoid 12 negative appendectomies but at the cost of one cancer death due to radiation (5). In Denmark surgery is still the only treatment for appendicitis, but how is appendicitis diagnosed? Is acute appendicitis still a clinical diagnosis?

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTDiagnostic imaging

Ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging

Sponsors

Claus Anders Bertelsen, PhD, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a diagnosis for appendicitis undergoing appendectomy during the same admission during the period 2000-15

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annual percentage use diagnostic imaging before appendectomy24 hoursAnnual percentage use of abdominal ultrasonography, abdominal computerized tomography (with or without contrast) and abdominal MRI 24 hours before appendectomy for appendicitis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences in use of magnetic resonance imaging24 hoursDifferences in use of magnetic resonance imaging between gender, age groups divided into decades and the five Danish administrative regions.
Differences in use of ultrasonography.24 hoursDifferences in use of ultrasonography between gender, age groups divided into decades and the five Danish administrative regions.
Differences in use of abdominal computerized tomography (with or without contrast)24 hoursDifferences in use of abdominal computerized tomography (with or without contrast) between gender, age groups divided into decades and the five Danish administrative regions.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026